• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Third Palestinian dead as search for 3 missing teenagers go on

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm pretty sure that if Martian Scientologists started emigrating to the region en masse, then carved out a new state in the middle there, the response would have been exactly the same.
Have Martian scientologists maintained a presence in the region, despite numerous attempts of exile and genocide by enemies, over thousands of years? Also by 'carved out a state' I can only assume you mean 'became one of the first states in the world to have been legally created by an international body'.
 
Have Martian scientologists maintained a presence in the region, despite numerous attempts of exile and genocide by enemies, over thousands of years? Also by 'carved out a state' I can only assume you mean 'became one of the first states in the world to have been legally created by an international body'.

Use whatever language you please, you are sidestepping the point entirely. You are attempting to frame the issue purely in racial terms, i.e. a function of antisemitism and nothing else. Yet I see no reason to expect that the reaction would have been dissimilar if some other state for some other ethnic group was created instead of Israel. Would the Palestinians and surrounding Arab neighbors really have been totally OK with the Kingdom of Jersualem full of European Christians being put in its place? Or the Martian Scientologist State? I am not condoning the actions of the Arab League in 47/48, yet I also reject your premise.
 

Dryk

Member
Also by 'carved out a state' I can only assume you mean 'became one of the first states in the world to have been legally created by an international body'.
Legally carved out by an international body maybe. I just hope that we've all learnt our lesson and don't decide to try it again in the future.

Dead Man needs to just admit he really doesn't care about the three murdered and mutilated school kids and will take just about any opportunity to throw blame on Israel.
The lack of condemnation of Hamas (there is but it's not as severe) comes down to "terrorists gonna terrorist", in that we expect that from them and so it falls under the general umbrella of "terrorism is bad please don't do it". Israel on the other hand likes to portray themselves as better than that, so they invite condemnation when they fail to live up to those standards.

Long story short, if you want to be seen as a shining beacon of democracy and morality in the Middle East then fucking act like it.
 

IpsoFacto

Member
Lol, it's not a war when one side is shooting metal cans and the other is using artillery and air strikes.

It's like shooting someone with a shotgun after they attacked you with a plastic spork.

Maybe you should do some research on Hamas and their military capabilities before making that "joke".
 

mcflyOS

Banned
Use whatever language you please, you are sidestepping the point entirely. You are attempting to frame the issue purely in racial terms, i.e. a function of antisemitism and nothing else. Yet I see no reason to expect that the reaction would have been dissimilar if some other state for some other ethnic group was created instead of Israel. Would the Palestinians and surrounding Arab neighbors really have been totally OK with the Kingdom of Jersualem full of European Christians being put in its place? Or the Martian Scientologist State? I am not condoning the actions of the Arab League in 47/48, yet I also reject your premise.

It extends farther than just its neighbours, which is where the anti-Semitism factors in, is there any rational geopolitical reason why Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as Pakistan, still don't recognize Israel, but India, Thailand and the Philippines do?
 
Use whatever language you please, you are sidestepping the point entirely. You are attempting to frame the issue purely in racial terms, i.e. a function of antisemitism and nothing else. Yet I see no reason to expect that the reaction would have been dissimilar if some other state for some other ethnic group was created instead of Israel. Would the Palestinians and surrounding Arab neighbors really have been totally OK with the Kingdom of Jersualem full of European Christians being put in its place? Or the Martian Scientologist State? I am not condoning the actions of the Arab League in 47/48, yet I also reject your premise.
I am not sidestepping anything and I recognise the conflict is an issue of land ownership. But in terms of history, there were enough massacres of Jews prior to the founding of the state of Israel, and numerous examples of compliance with the Nazis to show that the root cause of antisemitism in the middle east cannot reasonably be identified as the creation of Israel. And in modern times, the actual words of those who fight against Israel leave no doubt that it is not simply the actions of Jews but the existence of Jews that motivates their hate. Nothing I have said has implied that there wouldn't be problems if it were another group who returned en masse to the region, fleeing persecution. If people used such a pretext to murder scientologist children instead, it would just be racist terror under another name. My above reply was because your comparison lacked the nuances of the actual situation - that Jews had never entirely left the region, we're living in a forced exile, and had no problem with a Palestinian state alongside it's own.
 
Legally carved out by an international body maybe. I just hope that we've all learnt our lesson and don't decide to try it again in the future.
So Pakistan and India, among other places, were a mistake we should never repeat?

Crap, sorry for double post.
 

Chichikov

Member
By saying since 1948 and not since 1967 you make it clear the very presence of a Jewish state is the problem and has little to do with occupation. Shame events such as the 1929 massacre in Hebron can't even be blamed on that.
700,000 people were displaced from their homes in 1948, and while you can argue who and what caused them to flee, it's beyond doubt who prevented them from going back to their homes, and that's Israel.
 
700,000 people were displaced from their homes in 1948, and while you can argue who and what caused them to flee, it's beyond doubt who prevented them from going back to their homes, and that's Israel.
Partly true and certainly regrettable, I feel for all the displaced. Just like I feel for the greater number who were exiled from their homes in middle eastern countries at the same time. Of course, they had a new home country to flee to, where they could start afresh without a penny to their names, but the Arab refugees were kept as political pawns in camps by the ashamed and defeated Arab countries. If only their rulers had accepted the UN plan, they too would have at least had a homeland to live in. So yes, I feel for them, but I also think their anger should have been equally directed at the Arab rulers who created the situation.
 

MacNille

Banned
700,000 people were displaced from their homes in 1948, and while you can argue who and what caused them to flee, it's beyond doubt who prevented them from going back to their homes, and that's Israel.

and about the same numbers of jews was displaced in the arabic countries and was forced to flee.
 

mcflyOS

Banned
and about the same numbers of jews was displaced in the arabic countries and was forced to flee.

You could add arab Christians as well. The majority of Arabs in the U.S. are Christians, a fact many people don't know, they're leaving the Mideast in large numbers.
 

Chichikov

Member
and about the same numbers of jews was displaced in the arabic countries and was forced to flee.
First of all, two wrong don't make a right.
But more importantly, why do the Palestinians have to bear responsibility for something that happened in Morocco or Iraq?
Also, this is some post-hoc justification as the migration (they weren't really expelled, not for the most part) from Arab countries to Israel happened after 1948.

Partly true and certainly regrettable, I feel for all the displaced. Just like I feel for the greater number who were exiled from their homes in middle eastern countries at the same time. Of course, they had a new home country to flee to, where they could start afresh without a penny to their names, but the Arab refugees were kept as political pawns in camps by the ashamed and defeated Arab countries. If only their rulers had accepted the UN plan, they too would have at least had a homeland to live in. So yes, I feel for them, but I also think their anger should have been equally directed at the Arab rulers who created the situation.
Rulers?
Palestinians had no rulers, and only about 10,000 of them participated in the fighting in 1948.
And while I agree that they could've been treated better (mainly in Lebanon, they were granted citizenship in Jordan and legal residence in Syria, which is as much as you can hope given the state of these countries) but considering Israel put army on its border and shot at anyone trying to go back to the home they just left, I don't think they get to point any fingers at anyone here.
 
Rulers?
Palestinians had no rulers, and only about 10,000 of them participated in the fighting in 1948.
And while I agree that they could've been treated better (mainly in Lebanon, they were granted citizenship in Jordan and legal residence in Syria, which is as much as you can hope given the state of these countries) but considering Israel put army on its border and shot at anyone trying to go back to the home they just left, I don't think they get to point any fingers at anyone here.
I could have been clearer. The leaders of the Arab countries who persuaded hundreds of thousands to leave their homes with the promise they could return as soon as Israel was annihilated. And the rulers of their adopted countries which, with the eventual partial exception of Jordan, refused them citizenship and in most cases have resigned generations of them to refugee camps.

I think you and I are not worlds apart and appreciate level headed contributors in discussions such as this.
 

Chichikov

Member
I could have been clearer. The leaders of the Arab countries who persuaded hundreds of thousands to leave their homes with the promise they could return as soon as Israel was annihilated. And the rulers of their adopted countries which, with the eventual partial exception of Jordan, refused them citizenship and in most cases have resigned generations of them to refugee camps.
First of all, this is not an accurate description of the Palestinian displacement in 1948.
Some of them got persuaded to leave their home by Arab leaders.
Some of them got old school ethnically cleansed.
Many of them just ran away because holy shit we're unarmed farmers and there's a dirty dirty civil war going around us.

But I don't feel that's the important question, population get displaced during such conflicts, it's a sad fact of life, but what cause them to stay and form their refugee camps was not the Arab leaders, it was Israel, a country that was form on the idea that you have the right to return to place your great great grandparents lived in 2000 ago said, no, fuck you, you have no right to return the place you lived in 3 months ago, and we'll shoot you if you try.
The Palestinian refugee problem was created by Israel, and I think it take a bit of nerve for Israel to point fingers at its much poorer neighboring countries and expect them to fix it.
I think you and I are not worlds apart and appreciate level headed contributors in discussions such as this.
Thanks, I try my best, I sometime get carried away, don't take it personally.
:)
 
First of all, this is not an accurate description of the Palestinian displacement in 1948.
Some of them got persuaded to leave their home by Arab leaders.
Some of them got old school ethnically cleansed.
Many of them just ran away because holy shit we're unarmed farmers and there's a dirty dirty civil war going around us.
You're right and that's why I said hundreds of thousands and not all - just a sizable proportion. We should also mention the many who simply sold their land because they were offered good deal. This is how most of the immigrants prior to 1948 got their land, without bloodshed on any side.

But I don't feel that's the important question, population get displaced during such conflicts, it's a sad fact of life, but what cause them to stay and form their refugee camps was not the Arab leaders, it was Israel, a country that was form on the idea that you have the right to return to place your great great grandparents lived in 2000 ago said, no, fuck you, you have no right to return the place you lived in 3 months ago, and we'll shoot you if you try.
The Palestinian refugee problem was created by Israel, and I think it take a bit of nerve for Israel to point fingers at its much poorer neighboring countries and expect them to fix it.
I hear your point, but those very leaders had prevented a Palestinian state forming alongside the Jewish one in the first place. Of course, there would have been plenty of Arabs in what became Israel who would not have wanted to leave, but there would have been nothing akin to the real refugee problem that did in fact occur had the treaty not been rejected.
Thanks, I try my best, I sometime get carried away, don't take it personally.
:)
Of course, and I'm just the same. I just wish everyone could agree to focus their energy on solving the current problem and building bridges between communities instead of listing up grievances!
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
Thousands of kids killed and raped in Africa, no one cares.
 
I can guarantee that the kidnapping and death of the Jewish teens was done by actors unhappy with the Hamas-Fatah unity government. I pray that they dont dissolve it.
 
So Pakistan and India, among other places, were a mistake we should never repeat?

Crap, sorry for double post.
Err, the leaders of soon-to-be Pakistan and India Jinnah, Nehru, Sardar Patel, Maulana Azad all wanted a Pakistan. Only Gandhi didn't, but reluctantly agreed. Where were the Arab leaders during the creation of Israel?
 

ymoc

Member
I am not sidestepping anything and I recognise the conflict is an issue of land ownership. But in terms of history, there were enough massacres of Jews prior to the founding of the state of Israel, and numerous examples of compliance with the Nazis to show that the root cause of antisemitism in the middle east cannot reasonably be identified as the creation of Israel. And in modern times, the actual words of those who fight against Israel leave no doubt that it is not simply the actions of Jews but the existence of Jews that motivates their hate. Nothing I have said has implied that there wouldn't be problems if it were another group who returned en masse to the region, fleeing persecution. If people used such a pretext to murder scientologist children instead, it would just be racist terror under another name. My above reply was because your comparison lacked the nuances of the actual situation - that Jews had never entirely left the region, we're living in a forced exile, and had no problem with a Palestinian state alongside it's own.

This dude...this dude.
My man Bobby bringing the good old Israel "rationale" to the discussion as usual.
No Bobby, what happened in WW2 gives no free card to Israel for what they're doing now.
And no Bobby, Israel isn't the only ethnicity to have been a target of eradication in that time, so proceed to educate yourself more on the topic before you pull another strawman from your ass in the future.
Just for the record, Bobby, did you know that the Jews were probably the most privileged among all in the beloved Roman Empire? At one point they didn't even need to bow to the caesar. They had more autonomy compared to other nations, they could practice their religion without restrictions (!!!!).
But you do you know what the Jews did, Bobby? Do you?
They would be ungrateful Bobby. They would want more. They would take a town and claim it as their own. They would want to make a little Jewish state in the middle of the Roman Empire. You can imagine how well that went. After all things done, they would get another "antisemite" guilt card up their sleeve. Now I'm not pointing all the blame on the Jews, but they're usually responsible for their own fate. Case in point: Palestine.
Oh why, why Bobby, do people cry out against the actions of Israel? Why do we still support the Palestinian people even after they throw a few stones (sometimes called rockets?) at Israel? I'll tell you why Bobby.
Come closer. I'll whisper it to you: "H-o-l-o-c-a-u-s-t."
Now now, calm down Bobby. Take a deep breath, reclaim your faculties.
Holocaust, Bobby. Say it out loud, let it sink in.
H-o-l-o-c-a-u-s-t. Israel is in the process of exterminating an entire nation and you are victim blaming them for defending themselves (rather ineffectively even)! Now that Bobby is not kosher. I want you to take a deep look inside and reevaluate your stance on the Palestinian issue.
Perhaps go read some peer-reviewed articles and see what the academia generally thinks on the issue. It will serve as a good insight.
 
This dude...this dude.

Israel is in the process of exterminating an entire nation and you are victim blaming them for defending themselves (rather ineffectively even)!

Exterminating an entire nation, seriously ? By that same logic the death of the three kids was part of the extermination of the whole of Israel.
 

JordanN

Banned
Wow, the hate Israel gets is unreal.

I mean I get it, you don't like Israel. Got it. But seriously, trying to paint them as these cartoony super villains who are "exterminating an entire nation" is too much.

I don't even think the average american sees North Koreans as "crazed gunmen coming to kidnap your children" (despite having a history of actually kidnapping people). Yet what makes Israel so much more evil for people to constantly call them killers?

IDF soldiers don't actually carry loaded rifles all the time. They actually have bean bag cannons or other non-lethal forms of civil restraint.
 

JB1981

Member
This dude...this dude.
My man Bobby bringing the good old Israel "rationale" to the discussion as usual.
No Bobby, what happened in WW2 gives no free card to Israel for what they're doing now.
And no Bobby, Israel isn't the only ethnicity to have been a target of eradication in that time, so proceed to educate yourself more on the topic before you pull another strawman from your ass in the future.
Just for the record, Bobby, did you know that the Jews were probably the most privileged among all in the beloved Roman Empire? At one point they didn't even need to bow to the caesar. They had more autonomy compared to other nations, they could practice their religion without restrictions (!!!!).
But you do you know what the Jews did, Bobby? Do you?
They would be ungrateful Bobby. They would want more. They would take a town and claim it as their own. They would want to make a little Jewish state in the middle of the Roman Empire. You can imagine how well that went. After all things done, they would get another "antisemite" guilt card up their sleeve. Now I'm not pointing all the blame on the Jews, but they're usually responsible for their own fate. Case in point: Palestine.
Oh why, why Bobby, do people cry out against the actions of Israel? Why do we still support the Palestinian people even after they throw a few stones (sometimes called rockets?) at Israel? I'll tell you why Bobby.
Come closer. I'll whisper it to you: "H-o-l-o-c-a-u-s-t."
Now now, calm down Bobby. Take a deep breath, reclaim your faculties.
Holocaust, Bobby. Say it out loud, let it sink in.
H-o-l-o-c-a-u-s-t. Israel is in the process of exterminating an entire nation and you are victim blaming them for defending themselves (rather ineffectively even)! Now that Bobby is not kosher. I want you to take a deep look inside and reevaluate your stance on the Palestinian issue.
Perhaps go read some peer-reviewed articles and see what the academia generally thinks on the issue. It will serve as a good insight.

His posts have contributed far more to this discussion than your bullshit
 
Now yet another Israel thread and yet more bullshit from Israeli apologetics.

"Well, Amjad a lot of land was bought from the owners! That makes the land rightfully theirs!"

1236123_1619456594945148_7478571023776494161_n_zps950e2a92.jpg

This picture clearly shows the complete opposite. 7 procent was bought by 1947. Not more, not less. Stop trying to paint a narrative of the Jews playing the market and buying the land.

No it was stolen. After a clear cut ehtnic cleansing.

Now let's cut back to the present.

Three boys has been kidnapped from an illegal settlement. 150 Palestinians has been arrested. Hebron has been laid in an iron ring. In Israel a FB page has been created under the name of "Kill a Palestinian each hour until our 3 jewish brothers are back"

This page had 11000 likes a couple of days ago. Now imagine if Hamas had a page like that. Bombardments of Gaza has been undertaken. Why ? I have no idea.

Bombardments = Finding the kids ?

8000 THOUSAND Palestinian kids has since 2001 been kidnapped, arrested, tortured and refused access to family and lawyer. In january and february 2014 alone the Israel state has kidnapped more than 740 Palestinian children. Even children down to the age of 5 years old.

That's basically a Palestinian kid dissapearing each two hours of the day. Some Palestinians have sat in Jail for more than twenty years without seeing a judge or lawyer.

Now all this can be explained in an kind of logical way:

The Israeli people and it's state relies on a self-perception of fear. Fear of extermination, another holocaus etc. And to uphold that fear you need what ? A clear and strong concept of the "Enemy". It can be Iran, it can be Hamas.

The Israeli state struggles with acting like their state is like any other normal state.

But when the truth comes knocking, when the opressed people respond. A Qassam missile lands on an empty field, or a soldier is kidnapped, the state is reminded that they are occupying a people. The response ? Bomb the shit out of it to send a signal to our own eople and all others that we have a strong military.

Israel will never get peace as long as they are the occupier. It's as simple as that.

Disclaimer: The killings deserve condemnation of course but forgive me if I feel that collective punishment and disproportionate response is bad.
 
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.602334

Ya'alon proposes new settlement in memory of murdered teens

Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu proposed Monday night that Israel's response to the murder of the three teenagers in the West Bank should include a wave of settlement construction and the establishment of a new settlement in memory of Eyal Yifrah, Gilad Shaar and Naftali Fraenkel, a senior Israeli official told Haaretz.
 
Aren't the bombardings a response to rocket attacks rather than the kidnappings?

Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.
 
Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.
The cries of 'we are in danger' also come from the Israeli children jumping under their desks every time the siren sounds in the hopes they don't end up the next statistic, like the last kid whose school bus was turned into dust by your so called 'metal scraps with a fuse'. But you have already shown disregard for Israeli children and look how long it took you to grudging concede these murders probably deserve some sort of condemnation, after a diatribe about 'apologists'.
 
Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.

So how many people need to be killed before those rockets are accept as real threat ?
Can we make a clear definition ?
 

P. Fembot

Banned
Another Amjad thread :)

When Hamas stop attacking maybe Israel will stop attacking.

Who wants to go first?

Yeah, I thought so. Neither party can let their guard down in this horrible stalemate.
 

Cromat

Member
Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.

This post is bullshit. I don't know where you live but I can only imagine people there would react if they had rocket alarms up to ten times a day and had to run for cover.
 

MacNille

Banned
Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.

Working or not, they are still firing fucking rockets! Of course Israel will answer by bombing the fuck out of the places that the rockets are fired from! Every sane country would do that!
 

ymoc

Member
His posts have contributed far more to this discussion than your bullshit

Please, do tell what point is bullshit? If you're going to contribute, contribute.
Let's discuss.

1. Gaza is a giant ghetto, surrounded by walls.
2. Israel has the long term policy of "resettlement" of Palestinians and bringing so called settlers to the occupied zones where they make lovely pure Jewish communities.

Let's try to guess the long term consequence if this continues.
Don't look at this short term. Short term you don't see the mass executions no, but when you look at a long term situation, nothing would please Israel more than to make the entire territory 100% pure Jewish happy land.
We can then argue about semantics whether to call it genocide or not, but I'm not in the mood.
 
What about the Palestinian child in Gaza who doesn't even have a place to hide ?

The reason this conflict is still alive is for one reason only. A people is being occupied, humiliated and massacred. But its will to live and be free endures.
 

phalestine

aka iby.h
Another Amjad thread :)

When Hamas stop attacking maybe Israel will stop attacking.

Who wants to go first?

Yeah, I thought so. Neither party can let their guard down in this horrible stalemate.

What happens if Hamas did stop? curious as to what you think would happen.
 

PnCIa

Member
Hamas is a rogue organization that wants to destroy israel. Israel is an internationally acceptet state that acts like a rogue organization when somebody threatens them.
 

phalestine

aka iby.h
Hamas is a rogue organization that wants to destroy israel. Israel is an internationally acceptet state that acts like a rogue organization when somebody threatens them.

Truly an ignorant statement, I don't fault you. Its unfortunate the world does not grasp the underlying issues at hand here.
 
y'know, I was wondering when this story -- the kidnapping and murder of 3 Jewish schoolboys -- would get a thread. I'm not surprised it's when the Israeli military responds.
 
Oh yeah that's right, sorry. A couple of metal scraps with a fuse. These things rarely work to other than playing into the Israeli politicians narrative that "we're constantly in danger oh noo".

Bullshit.

I don't understand. Did I just enlighten you, or were you intentionally being misleading? Furthermore, as others have said, these things kill people and destroy homes. I don't understand why you feel the need to dismiss them. The ills of the "other side" don't negate these.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom