• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

This is one game restriction legislation that would without fail pass

Andrew2

Banned
Florida Senate Introduces Game Restriction Legislation

The latest state to introduce legislation restricting the sale of violent games to minors is Florida, after Sen. Alex Diaz de la Portilla submitted Senate Bill 492 to the Florida Senate. The bill, like others currently either under review or passed in Illinois, Michigan, and California, prohibits game retailers as well as arcade operators from allowing minors to play games tagged with special violence warnings over and above the existing ESRB ratings.

The language of the bill is largely inspired by the California bill with similar language and penalties, with the main difference being the section referring to arcade games. Managers may not "allow a minor to play a video game in a video arcade, if the video game has been labeled a violent video game." Both retailers and arcade operators in violation of the bill would face $1,000 per infraction if the bill passes.

The bill also attempts to specify circumstances under which games are considered violent, apparently factoring in the optional actions of a player, and commenting: "Pertinent factors in determining whether a killing depicted in a video game is especially heinous, cruel, or depraved include infliction of gratuitous violence upon the image of a victim beyond that necessary to commit the killing, needless mutilation of the image of a victim's body, and helplessness of the image of a victim."

Though the Entertainment Software Association has not yet responded to SB492's introduction, the trade organization has vigorously opposed all other such legislation. The ESA is currently suing to overturn the passed bills in California and Michigan, and successfully reversed the passage of a Washington bill in 2004. The ESA is expected to offer comment on Sen. Diaz de la Portilla's bill before long.

http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=6984


I could personally say from living in Florida that this isn't new. For the 5 years now they've trying to push some sort legislation in regards to certain types of games and they might just get what they're been trying to push for. What interesting, I'm quite suprised arcade games have been included.
 
The bill also attempts to specify circumstances under which games are considered violent, apparently factoring in the optional actions of a player,...
That part is very important. Seems intended to get around the defense that "the player did it" under certain games that have an open-ended, "do what you want" gameplay.
 
Gahiggidy said:
That part is very important. Seems intended to get around the defense that "the player did it" under certain games that have an open-ended, "do what you want" gameplay.

You nailed it my friend.
This could lead to exageration and some Jack Thompson-ish dude could use it.

But all in all, it's a nice law suggestion. I'm tired of all those court cases and bad mouthing about videogames. Kids, go play your fucking Yu-gi-hoe and leave me alone in my GTA.
 
Needless mutilation

Oh good. That means as long as the mutilation is needed, we're all set. So, if some poor fool accidentally swallows the keys to my game character's car, I can cut him in half with a chainsaw and use a scythe to gradually rip him apart until I find my keys. It was needed afterall because the objective of the level was to drive to work.
 
Top Bottom