the point of analogies may not be 1:1 equivalency, but you are obviously equating them in your usage of analogies in THIS case.
the lowest common denominator here is not "the ability to take care of a cat." There is nothing involved with taking care of a cat that relates to "child rearing." If it does, then i'm teaching my 1 year old to use the litter box and letting him lick himself clean. No baths.
Comparing a cat to a human is more along the lines of a false equivalency.
I can communicate with a human being. I can find out if its a medical problem or a behavioral problem and take steps to correct it. I can ask the human being what the problem is and get a response. With a cat, you can only guess....and after $1k in vet bills..apparently thats all a vet can do also.
I can't communicate with people who put animals on the same level as human beings. I cannot understand the thought process. So let's say we are down to the last bite of food in the house...should I flip a coin to see who gets it? Heads...the cat, tails...my son. Bullshit.
Lets me ask those who want to call me a selfish asshole a question.... Would you knowingly adopt an animal that pisses and/or shits all over your house, knowing that the animal has been found to have no medical problems, but has already caused thousands of dollars worth of damage to someone else's home? And we aren't talking about a puppy or kitten here. Were talking about an adult middle aged animal. Would you run out and adopt that animal and bring it into your home? No you wouldn't. Nobody would. Even the animal shelters know this. I was told by several shelters that animals who get turned over to them that have problems where they refuse to use the litter box or take care of their business outside, get sent straight to the front of the kill line because they don't want any liability for damage or sickness caused by this problem.