teruterubozu
Member
"We're the party of Abe Lincoln" is the biggest horseshit mantra conservatives keep repeating. They would have burned his effigy if they lived back then.
Here's an even quicker history lesson: Names =/= Ideals.
The two parties switched political ideals around the 1860's I believe.
My point is not to defend liberals (though I am one) but to point out that anyone who claims to be a liberal but hate Muslims is not doing a particularly good job of it by the very definition of the term.This suffers from the "no true scotsmen" fallacy.
Person A: Liberals would not believe something stupid.
Person B: Well, some liberals might post this silly/racist picture I show here.
Person A: Well those people aren't true liberals!
Don't forget this gem of a disclaimer that's posted right under it:![]()
Sarah Palin posted this non-ironically.
:lol :lol :lol
The very definition of an echo chamber. These people are delusional.Comment Policy: The Editors reserve the right to delete any comments which in their sole discretion are deemed false or misleading, profane, pornographic, defamatory, harassment, name calling, libelous, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate. Additionally, the Editors reserve the right to ban any registered poster who, in their sole discretion, violates the terms of use. Do not post any information about yourself reasonably construed as private or confidential. Conservatives4Palin and its contributors are not liable if users allow others to contact them offsite.
Um maybe it's not a serious post, but rather an improperly labelled post from a family member on Facebook? Please? Because that's my least favorite kind of these things.OMG. Haha post number 9
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=128138792&postcount=9
was just so ironic..
![]()
I like that he posted this one last week, I wonder what Obama did in 2013 specifically that 'killed' America. And why wasn't it dead in 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012?
This 1948 film that I shared back in 2009 has predicted exactly what has happened since. The moral of the cartoon is very true. "When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against the other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives, and we know what to do about it".
Compare it with the US today & you can see how progressive socialists have engineered circumstances in this nation. A self proclaimed socialist (Bernie Sanders) is actually doing very well in the Democratic polls. If anyone actually thinks that a socialist is going to work to give Americans more freedom and liberty, you need only look at the last 7-years to see that is not the case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYk6pGcpQNY
Is any of that true?
Is any of that true?
Quick check: at last count the US is 8th in murders by absolute count, 110th by the more sensible metric of rate per 100,000. Presumably this graphic is using absolute count.
There were 14,827 murders in the US in 2012. 1,224 of those were in Chicago, Detroit, DC, or New Orleans. Subtract those out and the US falls all of two spots in absolute count, to 10th.
I could go look at gun control laws for those cities versus the rest of the country, but given the above it seems kind of pointless.
The image is one of the four most inaccurate ever posted on GAF, but if you remove all of the words it becomes one of the top two MOST accurate 😨Is this one actually accurate? I'm strictly talking about the amount of crime in those 4 cities throwing off our numbers.
edit.... I see people already answered this.
Is this one actually accurate? I'm strictly talking about the amount of crime in those 4 cities throwing off our numbers.
edit.... I see people already answered this.
Quick check: at last count the US is 8th in murders by absolute count, 110th by the more sensible metric of rate per 100,000. Presumably this graphic is using absolute count.
There were 14,827 murders in the US in 2012. 1,224 of those were in Chicago, Detroit, DC, or New Orleans. Subtract those out and the US falls all of two spots in absolute count, to 10th.
No, not even remotely. Did you think it was?
It's also filled with subtle racism.
I wonder where the U.S. is number 3 comes from.
Even if you're not sure of the statistics of those cities, would you really believe the U.S. is 4th lowest out of over 200 countries if you remove them? You'd have to really be trying hard for that kind of thing to seem realistic.Thank you!
I wonder where the U.S. is number 3 comes from.
I did not think either way, because I don't know.
But I would have been surprised if 4 cities in a big country like the U.S. would make such an impact, though.
The subtle racism is lost on me, because I don't know anything about the racial diversities in those cities.
That number came straight out of someone's racist ass.Thank you!
I wonder where the U.S. is number 3 comes from.
I did not think either way, because I don't know.
But I would have been surprised if 4 cities in a big country like the U.S. would make such an impact, though.
The subtle racism is lost on me, because I don't know anything about the racial diversities in those cities.
Is any of that true?
Quick check: at last count the US is 8th in murders by absolute count, 110th by the more sensible metric of rate per 100,000. Presumably this graphic is using absolute count.
There were 14,827 murders in the US in 2012. 1,224 of those were in Chicago, Detroit, DC, or New Orleans. Subtract those out and the US falls all of two spots in absolute count, to 10th.
I could go look at gun control laws for those cities versus the rest of the country, but given the above it seems kind of pointless.
Is this one actually accurate? I'm strictly talking about the amount of crime in those 4 cities throwing off our numbers.
edit.... I see people already answered this.
Some random turdcutter.
Like, do you really have to wonder about the truthness of blatantly made up stuff?
Yes. And the above posts above yours, including the explanations of why they are wrong, is exactly why this type of shit works on people. The liberals that are smart enough to know that it isn't true, will just get shouted down as someone that wants to the government to come take all our guns. While any republicans that are actually smart enough to know why its wrong don't typically bother to respond because they generally agree with the basic premise of gun ownership. Everyone else is somewhere in between being racist, apathetic, gullible or horrible at statistics.Even if you're not sure of the statistics of those cities, would you really believe the U.S. is 4th lowest out of over 200 countries if you remove them? You'd have to really be trying hard for that kind of thing to seem realistic.
Like, do you really have to wonder about the truthness of blatantly made up stuff?
As long as I am not sure, I try not to believe anything.Even if you're not sure of the statistics of those cities, would you really believe the U.S. is 4th lowest out of over 200 countries if you remove them?
Only to those, who know that those cities are predominantly black.Those cities are all predominantly black so it's clear what the author's agenda is.
Heres a new one that just popped up for me
![]()
Heres a new one that just popped up for me
![]()
No, but I'm sure you have one in your house, right?
I'm not expecting there to be a fire when I'm walking through thre park either, but you never know!No, but I'm sure you have one in your house, right?
I think the better analogy would be keeping a gun at home vs keeping a fire extinguisher at home.I'm not expecting there to be a fire when I'm walking through thre park either, but you never know!
Like = Agree
Yes.I don't actually have a fire extinguisher in my apartment.
Am I already dead?
Mhmm. That's why the picture is so stupid hahaI think the better analogy would be keeping a gun at home vs keeping a fire extinguisher at home..
Me neither.
RIP Cyan
1776-2013
Thanks, Obama
Me neither.
RIP Cyan
1776-2013
Thanks, Obama
Hold on here..
Who... or what are you?
I don't actually have a fire extinguisher in my apartment.
Am I already dead?
So... they're expecting to get attacked at all times? Must be tough going through life that paranoid.This is one of my faves:
![]()
Because everyone carries a fire extinguisher on them at all times...amiright?
He's a true patriot. When Obama killed America in 2013 Cyan went down with it.Hold on here..
Who... or what are you?
So... they're expecting to get attacked at all times? Must be tough going through life that paranoid.
Yeah I don't get it either. You can just shoot the fire and it goes away.This is one of my faves:
![]()
Because everyone carries a fire extinguisher on them at all times...amiright?
![]()
Nailed it
Reminds me of that Craig T. Nelson quote:These are the best, only because they tend to come from my poor, welfare abusing relatives.
Craig T. Nelson said:Ive been on food stamps and welfare. Anybody help me out? No.
Must be annoying to carry an extinguisher everywhere you go.No they're not. Just like they're not expecting a fire at all times. It's a remark about being prepared for the worst.
Must be hard being so afraid all the time. Like the boogeyman is around every corner.No they're not. Just like they're not expecting a fire at all times. It's a remark about being prepared for the worst.