Today's music is garbage

Status
Not open for further replies.
3 things that made me laugh in the 5 minutes I listened:

"90% signing about boyfriend/girlfriend"

Wecome to music

"I'm learning guitar...you know, ACOUSTIC guitar"

Hipster

"The only people still still making good music; Metallica and Avenged Sevenfold"

:/ Come on now pls be troll
 
Not even close to true. Garage Rock and Post-Punk are coming back in a big way.

They never died. Pretty much every genre still has great output. But as bands like Sic Alps and Thee Oh Sees either call it quits or taper off, there is definitely room for a new batch of ubiquitous artists.

Can't really comment on Post Punk. I will say that some of the bands in that area making a name for themselves today (Savages, Beastmilk, Merchandise etc) really do nothing for me, but I never got into the genre to begin with. I tend to listen to more straight Punk Rock and into the metal spectrum from there.


It's 2014, grouping genres in specific groups like these is irrelevant because they're are so many sub-genres and overlaps. And even if this wasn't true, what metric could you based this on? Unless you've listened to every album in that genre in every decade, you're really just looking at trends. And really that could be marked down as a criticism of modern day media and hype more than the quality of the music itself.

Ranking music by decade always struck me as baseless pop-culture nostalgia than music criticism. Judging a piece of a media on it's time period alone is a vapid criticism, let alone the entirety of music in that decade.

I don't listen to every album but I always try to listen to at least 10 or so from each genre per year, unless I know I won't like it (country, grunge). And the metric is my opinion.

Yeah ranking music by decade is pointless, but so is this thread.
 
So "today's music" defined as...what? It's staggering how broad a judgement that is. Beyond snobbish. To make a statement in any other time would be almost as pretentious, but since iPod that statement only depends the arrogance.
 
What's wrong with modern indie? It's certainly the most successful it's ever been, with Arcade Fire, the Decemberists, and Vampire Weekend topping the charts with their albums.

Arcade Fire and Decemberists just make me feel embarrassed for them. Joke bands at this point (not to say you should feel ashmed for listening to them, just that I find it to be a struggle). VW is pretty good, but hardly saviors.

again opinion

hate that i have to clarify that after every post
 
Arcade Fire and Decemberists just make me feel embarrassed for them. Joke bands at this point (not to say you should feel ashmed for listening to them, just that I find it to be a struggle). VW is pretty good, but hardly saviors.

finland_finland_finland.gif


Can't really comment on Post Punk. I will say that some of the bands in that area making a name for themselves today (Savages, Beastmilk, Merchandise etc) really do nothing for me, but I never got into the genre to begin with. I tend to listen to more straight Punk Rock and into the metal spectrum from there.

Yeah ranking music by decade is pointless, but so is this thread.

Protomartyr and Ought are gunning for my top 10 this year, especially Ought.

And agreed on the second point.
 
Arcade Fire and Decemberists just make me feel embarrassed for them. Joke bands at this point (not to say you should feel ashmed for listening to them, just that I find it to be a struggle). VW is pretty good, but hardly saviors.

again opinion

hate that i have to clarify that after every post

If you don't mind me asking, how are they embarrassing? Is it just because they're too "quirky" for you?
 
I miss the 90s metal scene (Death, Cynic, Gorguts, At the Gates), but my tastes have evolved over the years. So much variety nowadays it's insane.

I couldn't deal without having all my Math Rock, and before 2004 it was pretty much non existent besides a few outliers.
 
If you don't mind me asking, how are they embarrassing? Is it just because they're too "quirky" for you?

Arcade Fire aren't even quirky. they just play the blandest, safest shit that's derivative of way better music and are hailed as saviors of rock music.

Where the hell is R.E.M. AKA probably one of the most influential and greatest American rock bands in the last...30 years?

SMH at the lack of respect those guys get on the internet when people talk about great 80d/90s rock albums.

REM's best output was from the 80s....
 
If you don't mind me asking, how are they embarrassing? Is it just because they're too "quirky" for you?

It's because they're so absurdly earnest, image-centric and self-absorbed, to such an overwrought degree that it makes me cringe. On top of that they're both extremely bland and predictable (although I do feel like AF at least tries to be interesting... but they try so painfully hard that it hurts). They both have good songs once in a while though.

That's a bit off topic though, just my feelings on those bands


Yeah, I agree, but I'm not sure what Servbot finds "embarrassing" about them? I don't like them that much, but to say indie music is shit is ridiculous.

I didn't say indie music is shit. For example Transatlanticism is one of my favorite albums of all time
 
Arcade Fire aren't even quirky. they just play the blandest, safest shit that's derivative of way better music and are hailed as saviors of rock music.

Yeah, I agree, but I'm not sure what Servbot finds "embarrassing" about them? I don't like them that much, but to say indie music is shit is ridiculous.

It's because they're so absurdly earnest, image-centric and self-absorbed, to such an overwrought degree that it makes me cringe. On top of that they're both extremely bland and predictable. They both have good songs once in a while though.

I feel like this is true about most rock bands, though. If the Beatles hadn't been experts at marketing their image they wouldn't have been taken seriously. If Metallica wore short hair and polos they'd have been rejected by the metal base. The Decemberists in particular are probably one of the less image-focused bands, as they can change their sound and the way they present themselves in a heartbeat.
 
Today's music is very much oriented to generate income. Forget about artistic risk in music. If is not going to generate rapid buzz is shit.

Today's artists are merely puppets of their music labels, self centered in vanal and vulgar ways to live.

where are the true musicians? Where are the true composers?
 
Today's music is very much oriented to generate income. Forget about artistic risk in music. If is not going to generate rapid buzz is shit.

Today's artists are merely puppets of their music labels, self centered in vanal and vulgar ways to live.

where are the true musicians? Where are the true composers?

296.jpg


Yeah, fuck this toned down apolitical mainstream shit.
 
Today's music is very much oriented to generate income. Forget about artistic risk in music. If is not going to generate rapid buzz is shit.

Today's artists are merely puppets of their music labels, self centered in vanal and vulgar ways to live.

where are the true musicians? Where are the true composers?

Is it hard to type with your pinky extended that far out?

Subversive and experimental music is probably more visible now than it's ever been.
 
Today's music is very much oriented to generate income. Forget about artistic risk in music. If is not going to generate rapid buzz is shit.

Today's artists are merely puppets of their music labels, self centered in vanal and vulgar ways to live.

where are the true musicians? Where are the true composers?

I hate to see what you think of video games when the end goal of development is nothing more than something to generate income
 
Subversive and experimental music is probably more visible now than it's ever been.

It is more visible because there are more tools people can use to mainstreaming it. What you don't see here is true musicians are hardly supported by labels.

What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut or idiot would work

Profit...
 
I hate to see what you think of video games when the end goal of development is nothing more than something to generate income

I think the same way about videogames. I still miss the days of Snes era when there were true and talented people that love games before money.
 
It is more visible because there are more tools people can use to mainstreaming it. What you don't see here is true musicians are hardly supported by labels.

What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut it idiot would work

Profit...

basically, the same things that made popular acts thirty years ago. ok.
 
It is more visible because there are more tools people can use to mainstreaming it. What you don't see here is true musicians are hardly supported by labels.

What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut or idiot would work

Profit...

kanyedisbelief.gif
 
I don't know, I think it's pretty reasonable to say that today's mainstream music ( music that you hear on top 40 radio stations) is pretty terrible with a few gems that pop up now and then. I know I'm constantly changing channels because I can't find anything that I like.
 
It is more visible because there are more tools people can use to mainstreaming it. What you don't see here is true musicians are hardly supported by labels.

What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut or idiot would work

Profit...

Seems like everyone should have a major label record deal, then. Weird that they don't.

I don't know, I think it's pretty reasonable to say that today's mainstream music ( music that you hear on top 40 radio stations) is pretty terrible with a few gems that pop up now and then. I know I'm constantly changing channels because I can't find anything that I like.

Time travel to your favorite band's decade of relevance and you'd likely feel the same way. History is good at cherry-picking the good stuff.
 
basically, the same things that made popular acts thirty years ago. ok.

Hell, you can even go back 50 years to the Go-Go fad of the mid 1960's. What amazes me about people like FauX is how he just creates his own version of history in order to satisfy his crap argument. As if pop music is something that was only created over the last 5 years, and has killed the very essence of music! What happened to those true legends like the Bee Gees, Miami Sound Machine, and Smash Mouth? That was the true golden age of music!

Stupid.
 
And yet he makes better music than any "real musician" ever has.
No he doesn't. He makes decent music for an especific niche, but he's not "trascendent" his lack of global stardom is proof of that. He's not a "genius", he's just one of the very few talended people in his genre, which is filled to the top with filler.
 
No he doesn't. He makes decent music for an especific niche, but he's not "trascendent" his lack of global stardom is proof of that. He's not a "genius", he's just one of the very few talended people in his genre, which is filled to the top with filler.

I Can't Believe It's Not A Joke Post
 
What amazes me about people like FauX is how he just creates his own version of history in order to satisfy his crap argument. As if pop music is something that was only created over the last 5 years, and has killed the very essence of music! What happened to those true legends like the Bee Gees, Miami Sound Machine, and Smash Mouth? That was the true golden age of music!

Stupid.

HAHAHAHAHA

I'm sure I touch some artist you like!

Moron
 
It is more visible because there are more tools people can use to mainstreaming it. What you don't see here is true musicians are hardly supported by labels.

What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut or idiot would work

Profit...

I'm sorry we made a thread about your YouTube video.
 
Do we have to resort to name calling, geez.

There has always been good music, it's just some tend to focus on the mainstream as some example of general quality. The best modern music I've listened to is not necessarily the well marketed or popular kind.

Saying it's all rubbish because someone can name a handful of modern artists they don't like isn't the grounds for a good argument.
 
What are the requirements to be an artist now?
- Zero knowledge in music theory
- Zero knowledge in musical instruments
- Zero knowledge in audio and recording
- Been handsome or pretty
- Naked yourself in front of other people
- Knowledge on dancing in suggestive ways
- Love money to fill your empty life
- being a slut or idiot would work

Profit...


1. Arcade Fire won a grammy.
2. William Tyler/Joanna Newsom/hell, the drummer from The National
3. You must be trolling.
4. Google Lorde.
5. What?
6. Really?
7. Yes, even as Chad Kroeger gets married and has children with his attractive and successful wife - his vapid and by any account successful life as a shitty top-40 musician will only satisfy his empty soul because of the $$$. That's all he cares about.
8. Were you born before the year 2000?
 
HAHAHAHAHA

I'm sure I touch some artist you like!

Moron
I like lots of music because I can appreciate it for what it is. Some songs have great lyrics, some songs have a good sound to them, some songs are just dumb fun, and some songs are the total package (I would put Michael Jackson and Queen songs in this category). There is even lots of music I don't like, but I'm not so full of myself that I have to criticize entire generations of artists and throw nonsense arguments around to show how musically superior I am.

You know music isn't just some form of art that exists in a vacuum, it evokes an emotional response from people. If I go to a party I actually want to hear songs like "Turn Down for What", because they're crazy and fun.

LOL How I love angry GAF!

Oh, I see, you're just some troll.
 
Music is subjective and that's that, people have different tastes. I may not like country, but I don't go make a thread about it. Let's be adults about this people.
 
I'm not so full of myself that I have to criticize entire generations of artists and throw nonsense arguments around to show how musically superior I am.

Oh, I see, you're just some troll.

But you are so full of yourself criticizing my "dumb" opinion? Who feel superior here?

If you don't like my opinion just close the thread. I wasn't being serious when I posted the list that offended you. I'm serious telling you music nowadays is centered in money. You should go to sleep.
 
But you are so full of yourself criticizing my "dumb" opinion? Who feel superior here?

If you don't like my opinion just close the thread. I wasn't being serious when I posted the list that offended you. I'm serious telling you music nowadays is centered in money. You should go to sleep.

Frank Zappa was right.

If I don't like your incorrect opinion ill let you know
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom