They decided to add this because of the ps5 pro release right?
They decided to add this because of the ps5 pro release right?
They should've delayed this useless turd until it was actually finished. They clearly released it WAY before it was finished.
Or maybe that's the best that BGS can do these days.
Actual footage of me in Helldivers 2
lol this is by far the most polished bethesda game they have shipped. aside from some CPU related issues in towns, the game ran just fine.They should've delayed this useless turd until it was actually finished. They clearly released it WAY before it was finished.
Seeing how they couldn't even release the next Gen fallout 4 with all the advertised features (like a working quality mode on Xbox), you may be right.
Nah the ps5 will run it at 60They decided to add this because of the ps5 pro release right?
Genuinely does anyone give a shit at this point? What a massive letdown this game was and is![]()
But Fallout 4 is still way more fun than Starfield and you can see that from the reception after the show launch. People went back to it after playing starfield and found the old bethesda with all their flaws more engaging.I just think they've rested on their laurels too much and a lot and the things that you might have overlooked ten years ago (or twenty in my case) aren't as forgivable anymore. My favorite part of the backlash against Starfield is it's the same reaction I've had with everything that came after Morrowind. I was just ahead of the curve for once and I welcome my new found friends.
Because there is nothing to brake there lol. The game is so barebones that they will patch city maps half a year after release.lol this is by far the most polished bethesda game they have shipped. aside from some CPU related issues in towns, the game ran just fine.
But Fallout 4 is still way more fun than Starfield.
Or maybe hes talking about a 40 fps mode.
yeah, when its under 60fps things get bad with frame gen.Couldn't this be possible with FSR3?
Although, that introduces significant input lag right?
But Fallout 4 is still way more fun than Starfield and you can see that from the reception after the show launch. People went back to it after playing starfield and found the old bethesda with all their flaws more engaging.
There is something just deeply wrong with Starfield and while it might be due to some Bethesda trademark jank, i think in a lot of ways it doesnt feel like a bethesda game. the sense of discovery for one is completely missing. Especially when exploring planets. there is no stumbling into a brand new storyline when entering a random dungeon. In this case, a cave or a space ship. The combat in Fallout 4 is so much more fun than the barebones almost perfunctory combat in Starfield.
I too have never really considered Bethesda games GOTYs like everyone else does, so its not like im a bethesda fanboy, but that bethesda magic of exploration in Elder Scrolls games and the sheer randomness of fallout is completely absent in Starfield. The dialogue trees alone are so poorly done. It was great to see your player speak in Fallout 4. Why remove that? its just not the same having one way conversations especially since there is so much more of it in starfield.
I dont know, Starfield didnt feel like a bethesda game to me. i wish it was, at least it wouldve been far more enjoyable than the forgettable mediocrity it turned out to be.
I think the biggest issue with Starfield is they went with "realistic space" versus "fantasy space". Look at their other games, Elder Scrolls is a complete fantasy game with different races and such to choose from. Fallout, while taking place on our Earth, its setting is an idealization of the future dreamed of those in the 50s-60s. So it is still fantasy and does not match our true future.
Starfield took what we know to be true about space now, and applied it to if we could actually travel the stars. And what we know about space right now is: most planets are boring, empty rocks. People complain that most of the planets are boring and empty: well that is how space is. Their choice to make the game more grounded sci-fi, made it boring. What made it even more boring is there was no need for space in the games. The main storyline could happen on a single planet, with the temples a such hidden around the world. Going to planet to planet was not needed for the story, because in the end it was all about humans. If they would have added other intelligent, alien races, then I think it might have landed a little bit better. The gameplay complaints would still be there that some people have, but now the space aspect is needed for the story. Instead we got human settlements with empty planets in between, when they could have all been different cities on a single map.
My guess is they avoided the aliens so it would not have been directly compared to Mass Effect, and they wanted a more grounded scifi experience.
I still enjoyed Starfield. I completed the game and I am looking forward to the expansion, but I did not feel like hoping right back into it once I was done.
Tbf the games been recycled 3 times, no mod has removed clutter in the game, its fucked with spaghetti codeLol. It's so funny how obvious it is that they never embraced evolving as a studio over time.
lol this is by far the most polished bethesda game they have shipped. aside from some CPU related issues in towns, the game ran just fine.
Starfield is far and away the most polished title that Bethesda have developed, performance wise. Absolutely zero issues with performance during my multiple hours of playing it. 30fps on the Xbox consoles doesn't correlate to "useless turd". Regardless of personal feelings related to this game, its performance is the opposite of horrible.They should've delayed this useless turd until it was actually finished. They clearly released it WAY before it was finished.
A decent game would be nicerA 40hz mode would be nice.
A decent game would be nicer
It's a boring buggy game with trash exploration, trash gameplay, trash characters, and trash performance.It's a good game, so already one step ahead of decent. Just needs a few more options.
It's a boring buggy game with trash exploration, trash gameplay, trash characters, and trash performance.
Nah, it's fine. People overblow it as usual.
Starfield is far and away the most polished title that Bethesda have developed, performance wise. Absolutely zero issues with performance during my multiple hours of playing it. 30fps on the Xbox consoles doesn't correlate to "useless turd". Regardless of personal feelings related to this game, its performance is the opposite of horrible.
The beginning of Starfield had me excited because I genuinely thought it looked pretty good and it was running pretty well. Then once I got out of that intro it looked like ass and ran like shit.People expect mindblowing next gen graphics if devs stick with 30fps. When in reality all we will get is mediocre looking shit like Starfield because devs just won't bother to optimize their titles if they don't have to ship at 60.
Just because you and I like it doesn't mean the opinions of those who don't are "overblown".