That was really good. Feel like there could be a bit more buildup to it, though. Like, have the version sung by the dwarves playing as the orcs are lining up, and then transition into the more triumphant version like in that video.
Has there been any news on the TBOTFA EE?
Somebody edited the Misty Mountains theme into the scene in BOTFA where Thorin and the dwarves charge out of Erebor at the orc army - and it's great. Makes me once again mourn it's absence post-AUJ.
My girlfriend recently gifted me fresh copies of the History of The Lord of the Rings, which is great since my old copies have become pretty beaten-up. So tonight is all about 'The Return of the Shadow' Not particularly friendship related, but hey, I'm just jazzed to read through these again.
Lovely view and thank you.The Hobbiton movie set facebook page just posted this lovely view:
I fiddled with the colors and wallpaper'd it in case anybody is interested:
Somebody edited the Misty Mountains theme into the scene in BOTFA where Thorin and the dwarves charge out of Erebor at the orc army - and it's great. Makes me once again mourn it's absence post-AUJ.
The Hobbiton movie set facebook page just posted this lovely view:
I fiddled with the colors and wallpaper'd it in case anybody is interested:
Oh man, that's awesome. I'll nab that, thanks.The Hobbiton movie set facebook page just posted this lovely view:
I fiddled with the colors and wallpaper'd it in case anybody is interested:
Did you just describe Paolini as not being "overly derivative"?Edmond Dantès;157383628 said:In terms of writers, the following are similar without being overly derivative:
The following either predate Tolkien fantasy or were written concurrently.
- R.A. Salvatore (The Dark Elf Trilogy, The Icewind Dale Trilogy, The DemonWars Saga etc.)
- Christopher Paolini (The Inheritance Cycle)
- Cecilia Dart-Thornton (The Bitterbynde Trilogy and others)
- Guy Gavriel Kay (Tigana and others. He also worked on The Silmarillion with Christopher Tolkien)
- David Eddings (The Belgariad, The Mallorean)
- Lloyd Alexander (The Chronicles of Prydain is a series that draws from a source material that also influenced Tolkien)
- Lord Dunsany (Pre-Tolkien fantasy and an influence on Tolkien himself)
- George MacDonald (The Princess and the Goblin, Phantastes: A Faerie Romance for Men and Women, also pre-Tolkien)
- E. R. Eddison (The Worm Ouroboros, Zimiamvian Trilogy)
The Hobbiton movie set facebook page just posted this lovely view:
Oh, so perfect. Before BOTFA came I was hoping they use it just like that. "Sons of Durin" theme is great, but "misty mountains" would have been perfect, since it's last time whole dwarven company is together.Somebody edited the Misty Mountains theme into the scene in BOTFA where Thorin and the dwarves charge out of Erebor at the orc army - and it's great. Makes me once again mourn it's absence post-AUJ.
.
Edmond Dantès;157383628 said:In terms of writers, the following are similar without being overly derivative:
The following either predate Tolkien fantasy or were written concurrently.
- R.A. Salvatore (The Dark Elf Trilogy, The Icewind Dale Trilogy, The DemonWars Saga etc.)
- Christopher Paolini (The Inheritance Cycle)
- Cecilia Dart-Thornton (The Bitterbynde Trilogy and others)
- Guy Gavriel Kay (Tigana and others. He also worked on The Silmarillion with Christopher Tolkien)
- David Eddings (The Belgariad, The Mallorean)
- Lloyd Alexander (The Chronicles of Prydain is a series that draws from a source material that also influenced Tolkien)
- Lord Dunsany (Pre-Tolkien fantasy and an influence on Tolkien himself)
- George MacDonald (The Princess and the Goblin, Phantastes: A Faerie Romance for Men and Women, also pre-Tolkien)
- E. R. Eddison (The Worm Ouroboros, Zimiamvian Trilogy)
Any that you recommend?
Maybe I missed it in the OP but I was recommended this edition of the LotR books
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0618517650/?tag=neogaf0e-20
How big is the font size? I've had like 2 editions so far where the font is soooo tiny, I want one with normal sized font and if possible an edition that has artwork from Tolkien if possible.
Edmond Dantès said:Where in Middle-earth were the Blue Wizards and did they fail in their duties?
Off in the East of Middle-earth dealing with Sauron's forces via subterfuge. In Tolkien's later musings Alatar and Pallando are not seen as failures, but rather as playing a decisive role in subduing Sauron's easterly forces.
Tolkien in the Unfinished Tales explained the following: that the 'other two' came much earlier, at the same time probably as Glorfindel, when matters became very dangerous in the Second Age. Glorfindel was sent to aid Elrond and was (though not yet said) preeminent in the war of Eriador. But the other two Istari were sent for a different purpose. Morinehtar and Romestamo. Darkness-slayer and East-helper. Their task was to circumvent Sauron: to bring help to the few tribes of Men that had rebelled from Melkor-worship, to stir up rebellion and after his first fall to search out his hiding (in which they failed) and to cause dissension and disarray among the dark East. They must have had a very great influence on the history of the Second Age and Third Age in weakening and disarraying the forces of the east who would both in the Second Age and Third Age otherwise have outnumbered the West.
Did Elves actually have pointed ears?
Tolkien points out the following:
- History of Middle-earth, Volume 5, Etymologies.The Quendian ears were more pointed and leaf-shaped than [human].
Did Frodo fail the quest?
Yes, in Tolkiens view:
Frodo indeed failed as a hero, as conceived by simple minds: he did not endure to the end; he gave in, ratted. I do not say simple minds with contempt: they often see with clarity the simple truth and the absolute ideal to which effort must be directed, even if it is unattainable. Their weakness, however, is twofold. They do not perceive the complexity of any given situation in Time, in which an absolute ideal is enmeshed. They tend to forget that strange element in the World that we call Pity or Mercy, which is also an absolute requirement in moral judgement (since it is Present in the Divine nature). In its highest exercise it belongs to God. For finite judges of imperfect knowledge it must lead to the use of two different scales of morality. To ourselves we must present the absolute ideal without compromise, for we do not know our own limits of natural strength (+grace), and if we do not aim at the highest we shall certainly fall short of the utmost that we could achieve. To others, in any case of which we know enough to make a judgement, we must apply a scale tempered by mercy: that is, since we can with good will do this without the bias inevitable in judgements of ourselves, we must estimate the limits of another's strength and weigh this against the force of particular circumstances.
I do not think that Frodos was a moral failure. At the last moment the pressure of the Ring would reach its maximum - impossible, I should have said, for anyone to resist, certainly after long possession, months of increasing torment, and when starved and exhausted. Frodo had done what he could and spent himself completely (as an instrument of Providence) and had produced a situation in which the object of his quest could be achieved. His humility (with which he began) and his sufferings were justly rewarded by the highest honour; and his exercise of patience and mercy towards Gollum gained him Mercy: his failure was redressed. - Letter #246.
It was only the intervention of Gollum that caused the Ring to be destroyed. If they had bypassed Gollum altogether would any of them when in a position to destroy it, actually do it? Even the most powerful of the Maiar would have succumbed while in such close proximity to the Crack of Doom. Not many were above the will of the One; Eru and the Valar certainly, Tom seemingly, but that was in his territory.
What are the origins of the Orcs?
The origins of the Orcs are shrouded in mystery but the closest to a definitive answer is this; degenerate men taken in by Melkor long before Men started mingling with Elves. Melkor appeared to them in fair form as a false saviour and corrupted certain numbers of them He made an ill of the Gift of Iluvatar (death, freedom from Arda) that would later have such repercussions for the Men of Numenor. The dark early history that the race of Men are so reluctant to talk about. Then the degenerates were crossbred with Elves who had not made the journey to Valinor. Thus, the Orcs were engineered by Melkor, not created. Evil cannot create in the Legendarium, one of the reasons behind Melkor's fall, his bitterness of being impotent in that regard. Some of the more powerful Orc captains were Maiar incarnate, who better to lead the Orcs on the battlefield than Maiar who are aligned to you.
Later on the Orcs were once again crossbred with a breed of very hardy men, hence the Uruk-hai. Some Orcs actually took on the characteristics of Men rather than Orcs, hence these half-breeds looking almost human. These were seen at Bree by Frodo and co.
Were the Elves diminishing?
Yes, the Elves were diminishing in strength and spirit especially after the fall of Sauron and his Ring. Without the Rings of Power (Narya, Nenya and Vilya) the Elves could no longer stem the tide of progress. They were essentially luddites and represented Tolkien's views on industrialization, but their leaving of Middle-earth essentially mirrored his coming to terms with the inevitability of industrial progress.
Also, the Race of Men were preordained by Eru to become the dominant species on Arda.
An Elf remaining in Middle-earth would have eventually diminished so much that their physical body would be gone leaving only the spirit (hröa) which would be invisible to the Race of Men.
What were Saurons motives?
With Sauron the secondary factors were order and discipline, two things he was obsessed with, which Melkor took advantage of. His desire to finish what Melkor had started his main desire. Even going so far as to create cults in his Masters name, vague forms of religion in a work largely devoid of references to religion.
What would happen if Gandalf took the One Ring for himself?
Gandalf as Ring-Lord would have been far worse than Sauron. He would have remained 'righteous', but self-righteous. He would have continued to rule and order things for 'good', and the benefit of his subjects according to his wisdom (which was and would have remained great).
What would be construed as good would be obscured beyond reason.
One must also remember the Norse sagas that greatly influenced the Legendarium as a whole. The dominant theme of many of these sagas is moral ambiguity, the Laxdæla saga in particular.
Why is there a lack of females in Tolkiens works?
Many of Tolkien's great female characters were saved for his most beloved work The Silmarillion (Luthien, Melian, Morwen, Nienor etc) and work that went unpublished; The Mariner's Wife (Erendis) and Athrabeth Finrod Ah Andreth (Andreth).
In an ideal world, the works above would have been completed and published during Tolkien's lifetime, as a result people would be far more aware of the majestic female characters that Tolkien was responsible for creating.
The main factor in influencing Tolkien's female characters was his mother who died after refusing medical intervention due to her beliefs. He martyrized her in a sense and this greatly affected his approach in developing female characters. You'll notice that many females in the Legendarium are of a good nature. The few exceptions include the spiders, the vampire, a Numenorean and a certain Queen with a fondness for cats. But the vast majority reflect what he saw in his mother, his wife and the countless women he encountered during the War.
In terms of The Hobbit, Tolkien wasn't wholly swept up by the zeitgeist of the time, he and his children (which included his little girl Priscilla) when developing The Hobbit just couldn't find an appropriate place to put one of his females in.
Who or what is Gandalf?
He's a lesser angel restricted in what he can do in Middle-earth by the Valar. He's there to guide and provide council to the Children of Iluvatar, not do as Sauron did and Melkor before him.
One of the most important characters in the story, but it is difficult to tell in his first appearance in how much the later character was present in Tolkiens mind in The Hobbit and how much he developed in the course of Tolkiens writings, partly because the character in The Hobbit is deliberately kept somewhat mysterious. Certainly, the phase Gandalf the Grey is never used in The Hobbit, being part of many layers of later accretions the character picked up over the years. Gandalf in The Hobbit in contrast is never associated with any one colour , indeed, the first description of him offers quite a variety; blue hat, grey cloak, silver scarf white beard and black boots. Gandalf is an ennobled character in The Lord of the Rings, in comparison to the wandering wizard who flits in and out of the narrative of The Hobbit.
This Odinic figure is an angel in incarnated form, a Maia, one of the five Istari, bearer of the Ring of Fire, whose other names are Mithrandir and Olorin, who passes through death and returns as Gandalf he White, the Enemy of Sauron, altogether a much more dignified, powerful, and political figure than the little old man Bilbo meets on his doorstep one day in the quiet of the world. In the essay on the Istari, Tolkien states that they were supposed at first by those that had dealings with them to be men who had acquired lore and arts by long secret study. However, it is by no means clear whether or not Tolkien himself was of the same opinion when he first wrote The Hobbit. Like so much else in the story, Gandalfs nature is ambiguous, no doubt deliberately; so he might be human, or he might be something more. If we only had The Hobbit itself to go by, we should certainly have no reason to doubt that he was what he appeared, a little old man.
However, The Hobbit does not stand alone and once viewed in the context of The Silmarillion material, Tolkiens other tales and its own sequel, the case for Hobbit Gandalf being more than human grows somewhat stronger. If Hobbit Gandalf and similar figures appearing in Tolkiens other writings such as Roverdandoms Artaxerxes are not human, is it possible to determine where they fit within the context of Tolkiens legendarium? The key figure in answering that question is Tuvo the wizard, a figure who evolved into Tu the fay and eventually Thu the Necromancer. Tuvo is emphatically neither elf or human ( in fact he plays a part in the discovery and awakening of the first humans in Middle-earth) but rather a fay, the catch-all term Tolkien used at the time for beings created before the world and who came to inhabit it, including the Maiar. Thus, from Tolkiens very first wizard, who existed in the unfinished Gilfanons Tale at least a decade before Hobbit Gandalf first came on the scene, can already be found the conceptual precedent for Tolkiens much later bald statement that Gandalf is an angel or at least in the case of Hobbit Gandalf, a supernatural being incarnated within the world, neither human nor mortal but very human in his behaviour and character.
Yes, the Elves were diminishing in strength and spirit especially after the fall of Sauron and his Ring. Without the Rings of Power (Narya, Nenya and Vilya) the Elves could no longer stem the tide of progress. They were essentially luddites and represented Tolkien's views on industrialization, but their leaving of Middle-earth essentially mirrored his coming to terms with the inevitability of industrial progress.
Were the orcs and uruk-hai simply incapable of being anything other than malevolent?
Were the orcs and uruk-hai simply incapable of being anything other than malevolent?
That's an interesting question actually. Is there any mention whatsoever in Tolkien lore of there being a 'good', or nice Orc?
Yes indeed.Did you just describe Paolini as not being "overly derivative"?
Man, I appreciate your knowledge of Tolkien, but that's just wrong.
The pre-Tolkien fantasy certainly. None of the others.Any that you recommend?
As Loxley said. They were subject to the discord of Melkor and his lieutenant; even after the fall of the two Dark Lords, the residual influence of Melkor (known as Morgoth's Ring) would have prevented them from truly reforming. Would there be a place in the Second Arda for Orcs who tried to reform? Tolkien never stated anything of the sort, only theorising that Dwarves would aid in the creation of the Second Arda and that the Children of Iluvatar would live in a Kingdom of Heaven free from Melkor's discord.Were the orcs and uruk-hai simply incapable of being anything other than malevolent?
Tolkien himself has not been entirely cold-shouldered by serious critics. There is by now a substantial secondary literature on his fiction that finds shelf space in many a university library. Yet look closer and you will find much of it irritable at the exclusion of their author from the academic canon. The Lord of the Rings is accepted by literary scholars as an important fact of cultural history, rather than a great book. Or it is a spell you fall under for a while, but then wake up from. Yet for many who go on to relish sophisticated literary novels, it is an early, formative experience of fictions power to absorb us. No wonder that when the BBCs The Big Read conducted its poll of the nations favourite book in 2003, The Lord of the Rings was the winner. It is the work that schools readers for later experiences of fiction.
For me, this was certainly the case. I vividly remember one day, aged 14, climbing like a pilgrim the worn wooden steps to Tolkiens room in Merton college, Oxford in the company of his grandson, who was a school friend. I was clutching my battered paperback copy of The Lord of the Rings, much reread. And there was the great man in his beautiful room, crowded bookshelves up to the ceiling, a vision of lawns beyond. He sucked his pipe and chatted benignly. I was encountering the most important writer in the world, as it then seemed, though I was struck by the mismatch of this tweedy English grandfather and his lofty Wagnerian creation. He was telling me of the physical pleasure of writing. Did I enjoy the sensation of using a really good ink pen? I could see why he might be asking this when he signed my copy of his magnum opus: runic is the only word for the style of the inscription. Seeing Professor Tolkien in situ suddenly made it obvious how bookish an endeavour it was, this business of creating of an alternative world.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/20...of-thrones-and-the-triumph-of-fantasy-fictionCompared to The Lord of the Rings, A Song of Ice and Fire is morally complex and undecideable. No character is without moral ambiguity, observes the critic and Martin admirer Amanda Craig. There are no Aragorns or Gandalfs, with their uncompromised nobility. Even the best of Martins characters can be ruthless or vengeful or simply wrong. Tolkiens Mordor was the home of all evil; orcs embodied mere malice. Martin is more interested in the kinds of viciousness, ambition and vengefulness that we recognise from human history. Human actions are capricious; luck seems to play more of a part than any authorial desire to fashion just conclusions. As in real history, outcomes are not foreordained. Martin has said that he was influenced most in the composition of his saga by Maurice Druons Les Rois Maudits, a seven-volume fictional chronicle of the French dynastic wars of the middle ages. Martin could, of course, write ripping historical fiction if he wished, but by escaping real history he denies the reader any privilege of knowing what is destined to take place.
Edmond Dantès;159745714 said:Who here has used the The Lord of the Rings as training wheels before moving on to superior fantasy and literature in general?
This thread has less life in it than the author who it attempts to celebrate.
Everyone's saving their discussion for when someone makes the next battle thread: 'Goku Vs. Frodo armed with a frying pan. Who would win?' lolEdmond Dantès;159745714 said:Who here has used the The Lord of the Rings as training wheels before moving on to superior fantasy and literature in general?
This thread has less life in it than the author who it attempts to celebrate.
Edmond Dantès;159745714 said:Who here has used the The Lord of the Rings as training wheels before moving on to superior fantasy and literature in general?
Dumas is an interesting case. He himself would have been the first to admit that his works were not particularly profound, just good romps presented in the serial format.I used Tolkien as a jumping off point for The Count of Monte Cristo and War and Peace. It's definitely hard to jump cold turkey into classical literature.
Edit: Though in the forward of The Count of Monte Cristo that I have the author pretty much calls it a children's book.
Those types of threads are certainly quite fun, although there's too much in the way of repetition in them.Everyone's saving their discussion for when someone makes the next battle thread: 'Goku Vs. Frodo armed with a frying pan. Who would win?' lol
I read the LoTR books and then jumped to Terry Pratchett books which were a nice palate cleanser with them being more comedy and less landscape description, haha.
It was only a few years ago that I even discovered the existence of the Silmarillion because of all your posts in the LoTR discussion threads, so it was awesome finding a new trove of stories from the books I'd read ages ago. At a few points I did have to force myself to keep reading though, I knew that I wouldn't get the juicy Middle-Earth lore without a fight
That's very interesting. The Silmarillion has been described as antiquated, annalistic in style and a challenging read, something akin to the prose style of Thucydides in his History of the Peloponnesian War. That it gave you the confidence and will to read anything, however challenging it may be, is certainly something very good. May you achieve your goals.I wouldn't say that I've used Tolkien as a stepping stone to "superior" writers exactly (since I don't consider his writing to be inferior to others), but when I finally finished The Silmarillion after a few false starts over the years it left me with a feeling of pride that I had to share with other fans and a sense of achievement that made me realize that I could read and enjoy anything if I gave it the attention it deserves. I consider it a step along the path to fulfilling two personal goals: reading The Canterbury Tales in Middle English and reading an unabridged Les Miserables (sadly not in French)
It was a natural evolution throughout Tolkien's drafting phases of The Lord of the Rings, with certain elements from different manuscripts been integrated to suit the needs of the narrative. There wasn't an abandonment and rebirth as dramatic as that of The Book of Lost Tales and The Silmarillion material. There was however a period where he abandoned writing of the story. When he did return to it, certain key changes were implemented, including Bingo's change of name to Frodo.I've been slightly bedridden the last few days and plowed through a few Pratchett books again, but I've also been working through The Return of the Shadow. Does it ever go back and restart the story as we know it? It's fascinating to see how much of the story was written before even the most basic parts were decided - and how much was pasted onto new characters without missing a beat.
The idea of a gritty hobbit ranger is outrageous though. I keep picturing Trotter as The Mole from South Park.
Edmond Dantès;160336834 said:Man builds Doors of Durin in his house
Tolkiens drawing of the Doors of Durin in The Fellowship of the Ring, recreated in the films, is a well-known scene in The Lord of the Rings now imagine building it in your own home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1ZS43Vt8G8
Edmond Dantès;160233841 said:Tolkien's Greatest Hits - The Most Impressive Wordplay from our Favorite Author
Tolkien never did expound upon the fate of Earnur. He was a character whose fate Tolkien left to the imagination of his readers.Has Tolkien ever revealed more on the fate of Earnur? I know the Witch-King's challenge lured him into Minas Morgul and that he was never seen again, but I was wondering if Tolkien ever expanded on this in his letters? With Hurin and Thrain (maybe more who don't currently come to mind) being left alive to suffer I was interested to see if he hinted at the Witch-King doing similar.
That is shame indeed...I just finished the Silmarillion. How come Tolkien, never got around to fleshing out the Dwarven lore?
As the language remained unfinished, the history of the Dwarves did too. It wasn't intentional, although he did seem to favour the Children of Iluvatar over the stepchildren. There simply wasn't enough time for Tolkien. Christopher Tolkien did however include much of the unfinished work relating to the Dwarves in the History of Middle-earth series.I just finished the Silmarillion. How come Tolkien, never got around to fleshing out the Dwarven lore?