Tom Warren: XSS specs (20CU at 1.55Ghz ≈ 3.97TF, similar CPU to XSX, PCIe4 SSD ,, >250W, 10GB of ram and no disk drive)

I wonder how MS is going to market this. 'Plays the same games as Series X but cheaper'? It would be a bit misleading. How do you market this without outright making it seem like a poorer experience?
Just play "most affordable gateway to next-gen games" and you got it.
 
Less RAM?

Are you fucking serious?
Well what did you expect, for 1080p target you don't need so much VRAM. Hopefully it will still be enough for keeping shit in "RAM" portion of that shared memory. So you don't actually does not affect the amount of loaded data, which are there to be calculated.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand the comments here . So everyone knew MS was going to have lower price system. Yet , everyone seems shocked that the lower price system , is also lower spec , you know , since it is lowered price. Games are going to run better on the Series X than the Series S , that is kinda the point. If not . why on Earth would I even by the Series X if Series S will perform the same ?
 
Next gen support vs Xbox series X exclusives could be a sticking point.

The first console launch I'm aware of where the new console might not be able to play some of the future lineup.

This will be interesting...
 
I don't understand the comments here . So everyone knew MS was going to have lower price system. Yet , everyone seems shocked that the lower price system , is also lower spec , you know , since it is lowered price. Games are going to run better on the Series X than the Series S , that is kinda the point. If not . why on Earth would I even by the Series X if Series S will perform the same ?
If 4k+ and high frame rates are important to you.
 
So the Series X was held back in ram department to have a 10 gb block of similar ram to the Series S. I guess this will make scaling easier? but another example of being held back. Starting to think The X only exists for Microsoft to claim the most powerful, but they really want the S to be in every household.
 
Next gen support vs Xbox series X exclusives could be a sticking point.

The first console launch I'm aware of where the new console might not be able to play some of the future lineup.

This will be interesting...

Well, It happens on the Nintendo Switch and the Nintendo Switch Lite. There are some games that don't work on the Lite. Same thing with New 3DS and the normal 3DS
 
That is neither how render pipelines work nor how software development works.
Tooling, staffing, QA, certification.....all those efforts just doubled.
And since downscaling is usually a lot harder than upscaling ...well you can fill in the rest.
PC gaming benchmarks show going from 4K to 1080p gets you around 3x more performance. Obviously it will be more effort to support an extra platform.
 
So tell me .why does xss plays x1s versions instead of x1x versions for BC?

Because the Xbox One X has 12GB RAM (9.5GB useable). If the XSS has 7.5GB useable then it is 2GB short. Some games like Assassin's Creed Origins make use of the extra RAM, such as for the eagle mode.
 
PC gaming benchmarks show going from 4K to 1080p gets you around 3x more performance. Obviously it will be more effort to support an extra platform.
You realize that you are talking about games develped for console hardware then ported to PC and upscaled from there? And even PC only games are never targeting the high end hardware...they can just be scaled up.
Which was exactly my point......
You usually don`t develop high end=>low end but the other way around. Baseline is always the defining factor in scope.
 
Last edited:
Sony fanboys are sweating after seeing this thing. I strongly suspect everyone knows how little graphics matter and how much price does for gamers who don't post on enthusiast message boards. This is a power play by MS which may have caught Sony off guard.
So with this logic nobody is going to buy the series X?
 
Because the Xbox One X has 12GB RAM (9.5GB useable). If the XSS has 7.5GB useable then it is 2GB short. Some games like Assassin's Creed Origins make use of the extra RAM, such as for the eagle mode.

No worries, the fast SSD with HW i/o compression will help.
 
What's going on, why haven't they announced it yet? Seriously, 3 months till release only. Maybe they are prepping this low specced machine for March 2021.

As with the price, and the chicken dance around it, they are extremely afraid of public perception, because both have seen how the most vital point of a consoles success happened 5 months before they were released.
Yes the famous E3 of 2013 where Playstation whopped in at $399 and the Xbox One at $499 was basically DOA.

Both are extremely afraid of making the first move. I bet they are both sweating in their offices waiting for the other to make the first move. And Phil Spencer wants to have the cheaper Series S as a trap card.
 
If it's designed to run games at 1440p, that's a nice bit of downsampling for 1080p tv sets, without going overboard.

No disc drive seems a bit of a weird choice though. The budget conscious customers this is aimed at will be the same ones buying games on sale in supermarkets or second hand.

I know we're moving steadily to more and more digital sales, but I'm not sure this is going to be a great selling point to the budget constrained.
This is the most important aspect. I think it is dead on arrival just because of this.
A budget console that doesn't consider the behaviour of budget buyers.
 
I don't understand the comments here . So everyone knew MS was going to have lower price system. Yet , everyone seems shocked that the lower price system , is also lower spec , you know , since it is lowered price. Games are going to run better on the Series X than the Series S , that is kinda the point. If not . why on Earth would I even by the Series X if Series S will perform the same ?
I think it's more a case of while we knew it was going to be compromised to cater to a lower price point, seeing indications of how compromised and what potential knock on effects that could have for games is much more contentious.

We've got people here thinking it won't run all next gen games, people thinking it will hold back XSX development to cater to these lower specs, that XSS games will run like crap because of being downported, while others are certain it will be identical to XSX bar a drop in resolution.

There's just too many variables and unknowns for anyone to have a clear idea of what this thing is going to mean for games or how it will be received by the public, so we're getting a lot of speculation and new thoughts in here.
 
I think its gonna be more like 1080/30fps than 1440/60fps if they wanna keep similiar graphics fidelity as xSx/PS5
 
"Plays All Xbox One Games"

False advertising. Some are delisted from the store and the S won't have a disc drive to play the physical versions. So it won't play Forza Horizon 2 and 3.
 
Last edited:
Welp. That's my interest in this gone. If it had included a 4k blu ray drive it would have been a definite purchase, but as it stands, I don't really need this console, as my PC is still adequate.
 
Well, It happens on the Nintendo Switch and the Nintendo Switch Lite. There are some games that don't work on the Lite. Same thing with New 3DS and the normal 3DS
True Nintendo do it, but it's rare.

I guess it goes inline with Microsoft's no generations philosophy.

Interesting that digital only means they can avoid some confusion.
As there will be no series X exclusives games in the digital storefront.
 
Last edited:
I disagree.

If the average customer is presented with 3 (or more) price options, they tend to go to the middle. Companies will deliberately scale their services to take advantage of this. The $x.99 trick on prices is another example of leveraging psychology against customers.

In this hypothetical scenario
XsS - lowest price, lowest specs
PS5 - midrange price, much higher specs
XsX - highest price, even higher specs

The problem shows up if PS5 is a big jump from XsS, but XsX is not as big of a jump over PS5. Customers will "settle" for a midrange option that is "good enough" in terms of power. Brand reputation plays another huge role here. An example would be going to a quik lube or a car wash. The cheapest option is $7, the PREMIUM is $9, and the ULTRA PREMIUM is $17. It is likely that the PREMIUM will get the most sales as it is priced only a bit higher than the normal, and for a vanity service people tend to forget the $ cost.


Microsoft is hoping to squeeze Sony out by offering the cheapest as well as the most powerful option. This is not a controversial observation. However, it is plausible this will work against them, as Sony offers one unified SKU and Microsoft offers two, in addition to the "middle pick" psychological issue mentioned above.

but we already know that ps5 will have 2 sku's de and standard one
 
Someone really doesn't understand the concept of newer more advanced technology. RNDA 2 , faster cpu and GDDR6 RAM and you think ps4 or one x are superior ?
Even if it weren't, those mid gen refresh systems were always held back by the base PS4 and XO.

Even if the XSS is holding back the XSX, games built with it's specs in mind would still be significantly better than games on PS4Pro and XSX.
 
Last edited:
I think it's more a case of while we knew it was going to be compromised to cater to a lower price point, seeing indications of how compromised and what potential knock on effects that could have for games is much more contentious.

We've got people here thinking it won't run all next gen games, people thinking it will hold back XSX development to cater to these lower specs, that XSS games will run like crap because of being downported, while others are certain it will be identical to XSX bar a drop in resolution.

There's just too many variables and unknowns for anyone to have a clear idea of what this thing is going to mean for games or how it will be received by the public, so we're getting a lot of speculation and new thoughts in here.
I do agree with you. Personally , I would have just had Series X with a disk drive , and the Series S with no disk drive. and same specs
 
How can it be backwards compatible with every previous xbox console, if the damn thing does not come with a drive?! Are the fans getting a free digital copy of Conker Reloaded, for each game they own?

No drive = No BC (physical copies)
 
Pretty sure that MS is targeting this thing as a "gamepass machine". If thats not what you want, Xbox wise anyway, then they expect you to buy the series x.
 
So with this logic nobody is going to buy the series X?

Nope. A small percentage of gamers, be that 10 percent or 49 percent, value high end visuals.

The masses are playing Fortnite, Minecraft, League of Legends, and CSGO. Fun and value are way more important outside of these enthusiast forums. MS understood this better than Sony and they'll reap the benefit.
 
"Plays All Xbox One Games"

False advertising. Some are delisted from the store and the S won't have a disc drive to play the physical versions. So it won't play Forza Horizon 2 and 3.

That is not false advertising. You can play Horizon 2 and 3 on the Series S. As long as you have the digital version
 
How can it be backwards compatible with every previous xbox console, if the damn thing does not come with a drive?! Are the fans getting a free digital copy of Conker Reloaded, for each game they own?

No drive = No BC (physical copies)

No physical bc, but all the bc games on one are on the store. It downloads them it doesn't play them from the disc. This means if you want them, sell your physical copy I guess to buy digital.

Looks like it's either stick with my one X or shell out for the series X for me, or I lose my few old games/re buy the games I own.
 
That is not false advertising. You can play Horizon 2 and 3 on the Series S. As long as you have the digital version

Technically. Only if you already have it.

To those new to the XBox, they can't play all Xbox One games on it.

They will need to be careful how they word that. Like "Plays all Digital Xbox One Games"
 
Last edited:
Don't overestimate the willingness of the masses to dish-out 500-600 on a luxury item. Sure, some games will be held back by this thing, but overall it offers a great value.
For a cheap price you get to have this next gen new toy.
 
Someone really doesn't understand the concept of newer more advanced technology. RNDA 2 , faster cpu and GDDR6 RAM and you think ps4 or one x are superior ?
What's funny is that in the tech threads y'all all still speculating on the superior platforms specs, but when it comes to this console y'all have all the definite answers!!!

there's no way real nex gen games will work on this console like you claim without some kinda major compromises!
 
"Plays All Xbox One Games"

False advertising. Some are delisted from the store and the S won't have a disc drive to play the physical versions. So it won't play Forza Horizon 2 and 3.
1. This is not official Microsoft spec sheet.
2. Yes, if you own FH2 or FH3 digitally, you can still play them on Lockhart :messenger_winking: ...It's like bitching that you won't be able to play PS4 discs on PS5 DE
 
Their Strategy makes more sense when you see the prices like this
299 Disc less Xbox Series S
399 Disc less PS5
499 Disc PS5
499 Disc Xbox Series X
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom