The sport is so different from F1 that comparisons are meaningless.
The only things that are meaningless in here are your arguments against me because you've failed to back them up with any form of substance at all.
The sport is so different from F1 that comparisons are meaningless.
How can anyone with a shred of intelligence even claim that this is a team sport?
I don't know very much about cycling
Well, if this sport is as much as team as football, then why is it not a team that gets crowned a champion at the end of it all, but an individual?
Winner of this year's English Premier League: Manchester City
Winner of this year's Champions League: Chelsea
Winner of last year's Tour de France: Cadel Evans
Can you spot the difference? The wiki for Tour de France winners doesn't even state the team of the riders that won, FFS. How can anyone with a shred of intelligence even claim that this is a team sport?
You should have stopped here:
Well, if this sport is as much as team as football, then why is it not a team that gets crowned a champion at the end of it all, but an individual?
Winner of this year's English Premier League: Manchester City
Winner of this year's Champions League: Chelsea
Winner of last year's Tour de France: Cadel Evans
Can you spot the difference? The wiki for Tour de France winners doesn't even state the team of the riders that won, FFS. How can anyone with a shred of intelligence even claim that this is a team sport?
well, its not my claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_team
The leaders of teams are called captains, the rest supporting the captain. The team helps the captain but may be allowed to try to win. The captains have the most media exposure and best chance of winning.
You do know that there is a team category as well and that a team does indeed can crowned as the champion in that category, right?
Yes, the main media attention is on the GC winner, but that winner would never win without a team to help them along. If there weren't teams to help carry the work load, the race would be a war of attrition that would leave most of the riders out of the competition at some point.
From that same wiki:
So does Bradley Wiggins or Chris Froome have the best chance of winning this tour?
So does Bradley Wiggins or Chris Froome have the best chance of winning this tour?
So, without teams, nobody wins and no one will cross the finishing line faster than everyone else at Paris. Is that what you are saying?
The only things that are meaningless in here are your arguments against me because you've failed to back them up with any form of substance at all.
So does Bradley Wiggins or Chris Froome have the best chance of winning this tour?
At the start of the race, nearly everyone would have told you Wiggins, but a lot of things can happen throughout the course of a race that can change that. Froome is riding with great form and has looked really strong in the mountains, but Wiggins is still more than two minutes ahead of him. If Froome were on another team, he could have challenged more directly of course, but it would have changed the dynamics of how things played out and what Wiggins and Team Sky would have done as a response.
But ultimately, if teamwork is so important in this sport then teams, and not individuals, should be crowned tour champions. If the emphasis on the podium is on the team and not the individual, then we certainly wouldn't have this issue surfacing where Froome would need to be held back just to let Wiggins win because it really wouldn't matter in the end.
Wow! Such bad luck for Cadel. Flat tire at the top of the mountain with team car way behind.
Of course a few riders would survive to Paris and battle for the win, but the cycling season is a long one and the Tour is just one race. If they hoped to competitively ride in other events, they need to work as a team.
Multiday cycling competitions are much more complex than "first one to the finish wins". Some are going for the overall jersey, others for the mountain jersey, sprint jersey or stage wins. Because of the extreme benefit you get from slipstreaming, lying first is demands much more energy, so you want to stay hidden as long as possible, so that's why you need teammates.if something happens to Wiggins (crash/mechanical troubles), the team would fall back to help him get back to the bunch without using too much energy. In addition to supporting their leader, the other riders of the team may get to go for themselves on stages that suit them. If froome started competing against wiggins, sky would lose the guy that is supposed to chase down mountain attacks and they could jepordize their "sure win".
Their salary is paid by the team and their job is to do whatever makes the team look good, not to promote themselves
Bradley has the experience (6th tour he's riding). Means a lot in cycling. This is Froome's first time riding Tour de France. There's no guarantee he'd be able to take the pressure of wearing the yellow jersey.
You also have to take Sky (sponsor) into consideration. They put a lot(!) of money into this project. I doubt they'd be pleased if the team started gambling with the jersey this late in the race. Rather just to play it save and go with Wiggins - he's the proven rider. Froome will probably get his chance later on. Same with Richie Porte. He also put his own ambitions on hold to ride with Sky.
Did Cadel get a mechanical and Sky slowed down for him to get back? My feed cut out so I'm wondering what happened. If so, class act from Wiggins. Way better on the bike than off, especially compared to Contador's attack on Schleck years ago.
I don't think he had it on him to win this year. Doesn't seem to have much energy.
why are they waiting for evans?
I know its sportmanship and all but i dont get why they are waiting for evans.
I remember lance waiting for ulrich and ulrich waiting for lance but those two were friends.
Agreed. He doesn't seem to have the strength he had in the past, particularly last year.
What the hell is up with all the flat tires. This is insane.
No one wants to win the race because of a mechanical problem. (Contador not withstanding I suppose.) You said yourself, it's sportsmanship. That should tell you everything you need to know.
have not watched le tour that much during 2009 2010 and 2011. did contandor do something like that?
Team orders have been allowed in F1 since 2010.Ok, that all makes sense now. Thanks, guys.
I still don't think I'm wrong to state that this and F1 are similar sports. Plenty of the arguments you guys are making can be made in F1 as well. The only difference is that team orders are disallowed in one and not the other. Plus, despite the outlawing of team orders in F1, you can still sense the constant tension in teams where the drivers are equally matched.
I know its sportmanship and all but i dont get why they are waiting for evans.
I remember lance waiting for ulrich and ulrich waiting for lance but those two were friends.
This has been confirmed. Pins. Some people are just plain retarded <___<Looks ike some people in the crowds has thrown nails or somethign on the track to sabotage.
Because dozens of riders with flat tires, and a fall.
But ultimately, if teamwork is so important in this sport then teams, and not individuals, should be crowned tour champions. If the emphasis on the podium is on the team and not the individual, then we certainly wouldn't have this issue surfacing where Froome would need to be held back just to let Wiggins win because it really wouldn't matter in the end.
Well, if this sport is as much as team as football, then why is it not a team that gets crowned a champion at the end of it all, but an individual?
Winner of this year's English Premier League: Manchester City
Winner of this year's Champions League: Chelsea
Winner of last year's Tour de France: Cadel Evans
Can you spot the difference? The wiki for Tour de France winners doesn't even state the team of the riders that won, FFS. How can anyone with a shred of intelligence even claim that this is a team sport?
Oh wow lol.
Do you watch F1? Do you notice how when sometimes the 2nd flute in a team will run ahead of the star in order to provide some slipstream advantadge? It's the same, except unlike engines, athletes get tired. That's why there's a team. Make no mistake, the wiki does not mention the team of the winners, but none of them (well, modern era cycling anyways) would have won without their team.
There used to be a team chrono in the Tour, but Team Once used to win them all in a landslide and since the French hate Spaniards winning "their" competitions the team chrono has faded into obscurity.
edit: beaten, someone explianed and explained it better before lol.