Psychotext
Member
I'm not a fan, but he's unquestionably a monster of an athlete, and definitely a team player.
#TDF2017, St.15. Col de Peyra Taillade (8.39km, 7.44%, 624m)
Froome 22:00, 6.20 W/kg
GC favorites 22:40, 6.02 W/kg
Barguil 23:15, 5.87 W/kg
I didn't watch the stage today, but I assume Froome had helpers to take him up (at least a chunk of) the climb?
This is the closest tour for ages, Froome is hardly all conquering. Unless you think they're all on the same medicine?
WTF is happening with Chaves BTW? I had to check to see if he was till on the Tour (he is). He never seems to be anywhere near the leader's group, not even in support of Yates.
can we seriously give an standing ovation to dan martin. imagine had richie porte not crashed into him
hardly all conquering? there's a good argument to be made that he could have won 6 of the last tours. i LOVE this sport but I'm a realist. we're talking Armstrong/usps results at this stage.
i'm getting deja vu. people defended the shit out of lance too. "he never failed a drug test!" this is the cheatingest sport in the history of sports cheating. and froome is about to win 3 in a row. easily. you need about a minute on him going into the time trial. this guy has gone from being a nobody to the greatest rider of all time in the space of 10 years thanks to "marginal gains" and a cleared up chest infection. cmon.
... this is the cheatingest sport in the history of sports cheating.
I don't think thats the case at all. The sport is trying its best to track dope use as opposed to other sports.
Which is why doping use comes to light more often.
We've seen dope use from baseball to judo. For some reason it's just not as sexy to talk about.
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cycling...-de-france-despite-grief-20170704-gx4ovy.htmlWTF is happening with Chaves BTW? I had to check to see if he was till on the Tour (he is). He never seems to be anywhere near the leader's group, not even in support of Yates.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/brailsford-launches-rant-against-cyclingnews-journalist/ mentions the level of skepticism that cycling journalists have in regards to Team Sky, the mysterious Jiffy Bag that was couriered by Team Sky at the end of the 2011 Criterium d Dauphine that is being investigated by the UK Government, and the parallels to Postal/Discovery.Lets leave the doping speculation out of this. Froome has literally nothing dodgy whatsoever in his past. The rumours and speculation about Armstrong were huge years and years before it came out. Everyone knew he was bent.
Froome may not be very charismatic and the Team Sky TDF victory forumla is boring as fuck but he's clearly a decent bloke and a great rider who has shown his quality many times when his opponents looked to have the jump on him (at least in the TDF anyway). Today was just another example.
If Froome wins this one, you can't say that he just followed wheels and his power meter to do it this time and the race has been much better for it.
He's always going to have the upper hand until someone builds a team around another GC rider who can TT.
My one thing with Froome is that he never struggles.
I compare him to Nibali, who I consider the best all rounder in the world, and Nibali has days where he looks like he is gonna call it quits. That is natural. There is noway I feel you can naturally not see any dip in form during a three week tour. The only guys who have done that previously have been dopers.
I don't know if Froome is on anything, but at the very least, Sky's resources allow them to absolutely analyse and prepare their riders in a way that nobody else can.
*cough*bradleywiggins*cough*
We have seen riders that were on something get annihilated in some stages during their Tour wins. They just recovered way too fast afterwards. Froome hasn't been annihilated yet this Tour, but he also doesn't look invincible.
Will Sunweb really try to timeout Kittel at some point, i'm not sure if Kittel is that bad at climbing that could happen or Quick-Step would allow that to happen.
Will Sunweb really try to timeout Kittel at some point, i'm not sure if Kittel is that bad at climbing that could happen or Quick-Step would allow that to happen.
I'd hope the jury would keep the green jersey in the tour if he times out.
My one thing with Froome is that he never struggles.
I compare him to Nibali, who I consider the best all rounder in the world, and Nibali has days where he looks like he is gonna call it quits. That is natural. There is noway I feel you can naturally not see any dip in form during a three week tour. The only guys who have done that previously have been dopers.
I don't know if Froome is on anything, but at the very least, Sky's resources allow them to absolutely analyse and prepare their riders in a way that nobody else can.
My one thing with Froome is that he never struggles.
I'd hope the jury would keep the green jersey in the tour if he times out.
hardly all conquering? there's a good argument to be made that he could have won 6 of the last tours. i LOVE this sport but I'm a realist. we're talking Armstrong/usps results at this stage.
i'm getting deja vu. people defended the shit out of lance too. "he never failed a drug test!" this is the cheatingest sport in the history of sports cheating. and froome is about to win 3 in a row. easily. you need about a minute on him going into the time trial. this guy has gone from being a nobody to the greatest rider of all time in the space of 10 years thanks to "marginal gains" and a cleared up chest infection. cmon.
Wiggins never really looked a machine, he always looked human.
Then again, I liked Wiggins, so maybe I am biased.
Only people I see defending Froome and his team of cheaters are british people getting triggered and even a lot of them actually agree that his performances are suspicious as hell.
Everyone knows this is an Arsmtrong-bis situation and in a few years they'll uncover a vast conspiracy and the same people who were defending Froome will say " Well we all knew he was cheating but everyone cheats so who cares "
Yeah, no, that's fucking bullshit. So bitter.
Kittel is going to take the Champs easily you'd have thought. What does 19 look like?
Kittel is going to take the Champs easily you'd have thought. What does 19 look like?
This is the archetypal break versus sprinters fare, though dont call it a transitional stage as its not connecting two mountain ranges. At 222.5km its also the longest of the race as it heads through the Vaucluse towards the coast. The Col du Pointu, the final cat-three climb of the stage and indeed the race, comes 45km from the line, so its unlikely to make much of an impression. However it does signal some direction changes and as this is near the coast theres always the threat of crosswinds, particularly a 14km section between Loumarin and Merindol. The final 8km to Salon-de-Provence, once the home of Nostradamus, should be a tailwind, so even if it is the break versus the sprinters - starved for a few days since Romans-sur-Isère- it should be an entertaining day, the kind of stage where, if the bunch does let the break go, the eventual time gap between them will be north of 10 minutes.