It's not really appeasement, Canada's not altering any policy, they're just not poking the bear. Trump's an idiot, who would rather get praised in public and give up something, than be mocked while coming out ahead.
The business relationships, economic relationships, trade relationships, security relationships, etc. are far too intertwined for Trudeau to act unilaterally.
Maybe it makes you feel good if Trudeau went out like Macron and mocked Trump, but it's different for people who have businesses and personal lives that straddle both sides of the US/CAN border.
I don't see what Trudeau, with a new government, and a majority gains politically from taking a hard-tone against Trump when he's still holding a hard-line.
Trudeau is going to need political capital when marijuana legalisation comes. Trump's AG, Sessions, says weed is heroin levels bad, and we have a border situation today where even admitting to smoking pot at any point in the past can have you barred entry into the United States.
And I don't see why Trudeau, eschewing tact and diplomacy, and generally acting like Trump (whose behavior everyone is criticising) gets anyone anything.
When NAFTA was threatened, Trudeau said publicly he'd welcome negotiations (appeasement to some), but apparently persuaded Trump in a phone call behind the scenes to let it alone.
There's some kind of weird anti-Trump virtue-signalling people are expecting from Trudeau of all people because what -he's going to turn into Theresa May trying to get photos with Trump to boost his image?
Trump made hay over Clinton/Obama not saying "radical Islamic terror" over and over. Like that would help anything, other than being a recruiting tool for ISIS.
Well guess what? The radical group that worries me in Canada isn't ISIS, it's the GoP, and I don't want them radicalised against Canada for no good reason. Canada can handle these people through diplomacy because while Americans are too partisan to even get the same message from Comey's damning testimony, I think Canadians are smart enough to see that Trudeau's words and deeds are actually Trump-critical.
The business relationships, economic relationships, trade relationships, security relationships, etc. are far too intertwined for Trudeau to act unilaterally.
Maybe it makes you feel good if Trudeau went out like Macron and mocked Trump, but it's different for people who have businesses and personal lives that straddle both sides of the US/CAN border.
I don't see what Trudeau, with a new government, and a majority gains politically from taking a hard-tone against Trump when he's still holding a hard-line.
Trudeau is going to need political capital when marijuana legalisation comes. Trump's AG, Sessions, says weed is heroin levels bad, and we have a border situation today where even admitting to smoking pot at any point in the past can have you barred entry into the United States.
And I don't see why Trudeau, eschewing tact and diplomacy, and generally acting like Trump (whose behavior everyone is criticising) gets anyone anything.
When NAFTA was threatened, Trudeau said publicly he'd welcome negotiations (appeasement to some), but apparently persuaded Trump in a phone call behind the scenes to let it alone.
There's some kind of weird anti-Trump virtue-signalling people are expecting from Trudeau of all people because what -he's going to turn into Theresa May trying to get photos with Trump to boost his image?
Trump made hay over Clinton/Obama not saying "radical Islamic terror" over and over. Like that would help anything, other than being a recruiting tool for ISIS.
Well guess what? The radical group that worries me in Canada isn't ISIS, it's the GoP, and I don't want them radicalised against Canada for no good reason. Canada can handle these people through diplomacy because while Americans are too partisan to even get the same message from Comey's damning testimony, I think Canadians are smart enough to see that Trudeau's words and deeds are actually Trump-critical.