Garrett Hawke
Member
Keep going please
I honestly don't understand how this is happening. What is this. What happened to the world. Are we in a twilight zone episode or some shit.
I mean, it's not like it's some rumor or something that requires further digging -- it's documented and just sitting out there!That's baffling me too. The media should be all over that.
Might be the rape case involving a 13 year old girl actually.
He really does repeat everything 3 times, doesn't he (with a slight rewording the 2nd time).
It's like a repetition sandwich. Repeating three times. A repetition sandwich.
He wasn't president so it doesn't count.
Actually that one is so bizarre and the press is avoiding it either because it's flimsy or nonexistent evidence or because it's literally too dark to touch.
Even if there were fire behind that smoke you can't report on it unless it's unassailable.
I guess literally don't want it to be true because it's too awful to think about.
He wasn't president so it doesn't count.
Actually that one is so bizarre and the press is avoiding it either because it's flimsy or nonexistent evidence or because it's literally too dark to touch.
Even if there were fire behind that smoke you can't report on it unless it's unassailable.
I guess literally don't want it to be true because it's too awful to think about.
FixedHillary doesn't need to be a 12D chess master to trip up Trump when his tic tac toe game is this weak.
Anyone have the Chris Evans one? I'd like for both to be in this thread lol.
This whole article is ridiculous.
Historians will say that the Second American Civil War began on the cool morning of November 9th, 2016.Mr. Trump, aiming to unnerve Mrs. Clinton, even indicated that he was rethinking his statement at their last debate that he would absolutely support her if she won in November, saying: Were going to have to see. Were going to see what happens. Were going to have to see.
You're gonna get shot..
I've actually never seen this before. Is it shopped or real?
As nice as it is to think this, I'm not making any declarations until November.This has got to be the final, glorious implosion. There's no coming back from this.
Too bad Hil can't pull a play out of Trump's book and tweet "I won't say it but people are talking about this case! I won't go there, though, just saying people are talking! (Link) Dark!"He wasn't president so it doesn't count.
Actually that one is so bizarre and the press is avoiding it either because it's flimsy or nonexistent evidence or because it's literally too dark to touch.
Even if there were fire behind that smoke you can't report on it unless it's unassailable.
I guess literally don't want it to be true because it's too awful to think about.
I've actually never seen this before. Is it shopped or real?
Shopped, probably from someone of the gifted GAF gif makers.I've actually never seen this before. Is it shopped or real?
Mr. Trump said he did not think he needed to prepare more rigorously for the next debate than he did for the first one, because any shortcomings on Monday, he argued, were because of a problem with the microphone at his lectern, which he “spent 50 percent of my thought process” dealing with. The Commission on Presidential Debates, which sponsors the events, said on Friday that there were “issues” with Mr. Trump’s audio.
Yeah pretty much makes women relate to her more lmaoBringing up Bill's affairs isn't going to turn away women voters for Hillary. It just makes her sympathetic.
BTW, does anyone find it weird that the scandal he's attacking Hillary Clinton with is something she never done? By attacking her on Bill's affairs, he's basically saying how dare you stay faithful in your marriage.
I hope he comes out on stage with a few specks of something white under his nose.At this point, it would be "cramming", not preparing, so really what's the point?
I really don't understand what advantage he thinks bringing up Bill cheating on her brings him?
"Ha, her husband cheating on her, ha. That's so funny, right everyone? Because it's her fault somehow, right? Hello?"
Why does he keep acting like him not bringing that up during the first debate is something he should be proud of?
The unusual thing about that case is there's allegedly a witness to the incident, the woman that recruited women for Epstein's parties.He wasn't president so it doesn't count.
Actually that one is so bizarre and the press is avoiding it either because it's flimsy or nonexistent evidence or because it's literally too dark to touch.
Even if there were fire behind that smoke you can't report on it unless it's unassailable.
I guess literally don't want it to be true because it's too awful to think about.
I won't feel better until the Senate elector count on January 6th unless she gets a massive lead on November 8th. I'm actually worried about faithless electors this time.At this point, I'm fairly confident he'll just get his default 40% of the vote for being the Republican candidate and not many more.
After being concerned for a while, I'm starting to feel better about this again.
He wasn't president so it doesn't count.
Actually that one is so bizarre and the press is avoiding it either because it's flimsy or nonexistent evidence or because it's literally too dark to touch.
Even if there were fire behind that smoke you can't report on it unless it's unassailable.
I guess literally don't want it to be true because it's too awful to think about.
I really don't understand what advantage he thinks bringing up Bill cheating on her brings him?
"Ha, her husband cheating on her, ha. That's so funny, right everyone? Because it's her fault somehow, right? Hello?"
Why does he keep acting like him not bringing that up during the first debate is something he should be proud of?
I really don't understand what advantage he thinks bringing up Bill cheating on her brings him?
"Ha, her husband cheating on her, ha. That's so funny, right everyone? Because it's her fault somehow, right? Hello?"
Why does he keep acting like him not bringing that up during the first debate is something he should be proud of?
Who does he even think he's appealing to with all this?
My fucking parents argh!!!! Who according to my cousin are ranting about the mic conspiracy. And I know I've defended them before as just being willfully blind but I guess I'm going to have to concede they aren't that smart when their defense of him "slut shaming" the miss universe candidate was that he just has a bad temper... like, Duh! That's exactly why everyone is saying he isn't fit to be a president!!!! (Though to be fair they don't come off as stupid but that's what is so frustrating to me. I don't think they are stupid but they just are trying so hard to be stupid and nothing will get through to them apparently).
But yes, Trump's lies/whininess are working on them. Ugh.
(Yes, I'm just a tad bit frustrated. I didn't realize they were in the trump crowd that the media loves to interview to make fun of them level until my cousin was texting me a day ago - she's visiting them right now).
I'm really curious what sort of excuses he'll make for the second debate.
I'm still kinda amazed at the mic one, to be honest, though.
Something like 40% of the American public, apparently.
Wow, reading the tiffany statement is jaw dropping. Trump should pick up this sex topic and move on before he gets blown the fuck up.The unusual thing about that case is there's allegedly a witness to the incident, the woman that recruited women for Epstein's parties.
And double checking I see it just got refiled Friday with the new witness added. Trump is playing with chunks of plutonium if he wants to bring up Bill Clinton's infidelity in a debate.
Edit: better link
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/tru...ne-doe-refiles-rape-lawsuit-with-new-witness/
Mr. Trump said he did not think he needed to prepare more rigorously for the next debate than he did for the first one, because any shortcomings on Monday, he argued, were because of a problem with the microphone at his lectern, which he “spent 50 percent of my thought process” dealing with.
He has used it before, I'm almost certain.
The next, his focus will be on the moderators treating him unfairly. He tried that out with Holt until people informed him Holt wasn't a democrat. That will likely be his number one excuse next week.
I'll be honest though, I called him not showing up after the first, so far it looks like I was wrong.
I really don't understand what advantage he thinks bringing up Bill cheating on her brings him?
"Ha, her husband cheating on her, ha. That's so funny, right everyone? Because it's her fault somehow, right? Hello?"
Why does he keep acting like him not bringing that up during the first debate is something he should be proud of?