I’m vocal about it mainly because I noticed this as soon as I booted up a game on the C9, and it feels so weird that so many people just seem not to notice or sincerely say that it’s not worse than on some LEDs out there, lol.
Judging from reviews of recent gaming-oriented TVs like the X900H it seems that even the newer LEDs are going towards faster response times and thus, worse stutter.
I don’t think YT videos are a good source about this matter. You’re seeing the recording of a screen through another screen that has its own displaying issues. You really have to see the things I’m describing to understand. TV retailers know this and manufacturers too, that’s why all high-end TVs have an attract mode reel going on in stores with highly curated, high-res, 60fps images. Panasonic OLEDs (not available in the US as far as I know) show some movie scenes too, but lo and behold, they clearly have some heavy motion interpolation going on, maybe because they know people would see stutter otherwise...
Of course I’m not arguing that Sony/Samsung LEDs are better than LG’s C series, because I’ve never used one of the models suggested in this thread. The C9 is fine, and if you only play high framerate games and/or don’t notice the stutter, then it may very well be your endgame TV. I just suggest to try before you buy, if possible.
See? You’re proving my point. It was very easy to assume you’re a 60+fps PC gamer only. Of course you’re not even gonna see the issue here. This doesn’t mean there’s plenty of people playing games with lesser performance though, and many of those are perfectly fine with OLED, so maybe writing “why buy this for 30fps” was a bit unwarranted, don’t you think?