So it's your view that ALL cases of two people, one of which has some authority over the other, involved in sexual relations should result on jail time?
How about police officers banging their arrestees?
Doctors with their patients?
And so on...
How about police officers banging their arrestees?
Doctors with their patients?
And so on...
No, I don't think she should get 20 years, she should be fired, have her teaching license revoked, and pay a fine.
The amount of people who are willing to speculate about what could have been and then passing judgement or advocating harsh punishment based on that really weird speculation is mind-boggling. What's it like to be that way?
Just like you are speculating that it was all innocent and no coercion was involved.The amount of people who are willing to speculate about what could have been and then passing judgement or advocating harsh punishment based on that really weird speculation is mind-boggling. What's it like to be that way?
How is this illegal? What is inherently illegal in these actions?
The amount of people who are willing to speculate about what could have been and then passing judgement or advocating harsh punishment based on that really weird speculation is mind-boggling. What's it like to be that way?
What's it like to expect teachers to not fuck their students? You got me I guess.
What's it like to expect teachers to not fuck their students? You got me I guess.
If only we had a legal way to figure out the story behind all of this, and have their peers give decide if the charges are valid or not, and an expert in law to judge the length of the sentence if convicted.
We should just jail anyone who has position of power relative to another person and has sex with them. Teachers having sex with students. Bosses having sex with anyone underneath them. Attractive people having sex with less attractive people. More intelligent people having sex with less intelligent people. Fuck freedom! Let's arbitrarily define which adults can have sex with each other and imprison those who clearly invoke their superiority, wherever it may be, to have sex with another person. Let's ignore the fact that in cases like this, we're assuming one party was abusing their "position of power" instead of it just being two consenting adults wanting to bang each other.
I wonder if this law applies to college students as well.
We should just jail anyone who has sex with someone who could be considered a lesser power. Teachers having sex with students. Bosses having sex with anyone underneath them. Attractive people having sex with less attractive people. More intelligent people having sex with less intelligent people. Fuck freedom! Let's arbitrarily define which adults can have sex with each other and imprison those who clearly invoke their superiority, wherever it may be, to have sex with another person. Let's ignore the fact that in cases like this, we're assuming one party was abusing their "position of power" instead of it just being two consenting adults wanting to bang each other.
Why jail time? I wonder if they have to sign up as a sex offender when they get out.
We need sane people to make laws please. The ones we have now obviously have mental issues and are not fit to hold that power.
I'm honestly having trouble seeing where the people in favor of criminal charges draw the line STOPPING the slide down the slope.Wow, you're like a living breathing embodiment of the slippery slope argument.
If you fuck someone under your authority in business, you just opened up your company to a huge liable case.
I'm honestly having trouble seeing where the people in favor of criminal charges draw the line STOPPING the slide down the slope.
Two people in a workplace. The boss is 34 and the burger flipper 18. Criminal charges?
That really isn't pertinent
I think laws like this to change. After thinking it over it definitely seems excessive. The teacher should be punished since she is in a position of coercion but 20 years in jail when it is legal for them to have sex....... I would think banning her from teaching and letting her continue to live in society would be a better use of her life.
Neither is purposely not recognizing the difference in authority between a boss over their employee, and a teacher over their student.
He may certainly be in charge of minors if this is a burger joint. And what do you mean by "legal authority"? He certainly has the legal authority to fire her ass.No, but the boss isn't a legal authority, nor in charge of minors.
How about police officers banging their arrestees?
Doctors with their patients?
And so on...
How about police officers banging their arrestees?
Doctors with their patients?
And so on...
I don't get the debate here. She's a teacher. She fucked her student. It's a clear abuse of authority. It's coercive sex. Coercive sex is rape. These laws are to protect those who might feel pressured to say yes.
Don't want to get in trouble? Don't fuck your high school students. I hear self control is difficult.
Oh boy, another thread where immature men live out their sexual fantasies through high school boys.
She should be fired.
But it clearly ISN'T legal, which is why she's been arrested.
It's not just an age or an omgpedo issue, it's an abuse of authority issue as well. It's usually illegal for prison guards to enter into sexual relationships with inmates for the same reason. It's POSSIBLE for it to be entirely innocent and consensual, but the potential for abuse and consequences of damage is simply too high.
If this woman REALLY was interested in a consensual relationship with this dude, then she could have waited a year and it wouldn't have been a problem. The fact that she couldn't or wouldn't says a lot about her judgement and character. throw the damn book at her and let her rot in prison as an example.
I think you just have a general problem with comprehension. Also an issue with differing valid opinions. Or maybe you're just angry. It's hard to tell.
I think you just have a general problem with comprehension. Also an issue with differing valid opinions. Or maybe you're just angry. It's hard to tell.
I'd like to see more people respond to this comment...
I don't get the debate here. She's a teacher. She fucked her student. It's a clear abuse of authority. It's coercive sex. Coercive sex is rape. These laws are to protect those who might feel pressured to say yes.
Don't want to get in trouble? Don't fuck your high school students. I hear self control is difficult.
what if the student was just really charming?
I think you just have a general problem with comprehension. Also an issue with differing valid opinions. Or maybe you're just angry. It's hard to tell.
You're making a huge assumption that she had to abuse her authority to coerce the student into having sex with her. Would she still be abusing her authority if the student propositioned her and then they had sex? The answer is obviously no.
Don't want to have sex with another adult just because they may be "coercing" you? Just say no. But I also hear self control is difficult.
If you're a teacher you have no business courting a student, which she was doing. This thread is disgusting in its defense of this woman's actions.
The part where it's clearly spelled on in the states law that it's illegal?
That's a start.
These laws are to protect those who might feel pressured to say yes.
If you're a teacher you have no business courting a student, which she was doing. This thread is disgusting in its defense of this woman's actions.
The state's law is not logical and doesn't seem inherently constitutional. It's not like states haven't made bad laws that have been overturned before. It's been ruled that sexual relationships between consensual adults are not under the jurisdiction of states to criminalize.
There is an expected amount of 'authority' given with each of those cases. None of them involve the teaching of minors over a long period of time. This boy happened to be 18, but how much exposure had he to the teacher before hand? There's a lot more influence in a Student/Teacher relationship than most any other I can ever think of.