Negotiator101
Member
Both reviewed well, so which one?
Both are done "the right way" imo
So kinda comes down to which game you liked more to start with
Metal Gear Solid: Zero ASSaultSnake eaters I say.
![]()
It's so close in the poll I just mightBoth
Did it? Seems good to me. Played 4 hours or so thus far.I thought Delta got a bad reception at first. Am I misremembering?
What's the time frame on SH2?You can beat MGS 3 in well under 10 hours. So play that first then jump into SH2.
What's the time frame on SH2?
You can beat MGS 3 in well under 10 hours. So play that first then jump into SH2.
Yeah that's a good point lolNot if you're watching all the cut-scenes and listening to the codec calls![]()
What's the prices of them both? Whichever one costs less.
I would say Snake Eater but I don't believe that is a remake as much as sh2 isBoth reviewed well, so which one?
in my opinion it's not a remake it's a spruce remastered what Dead Rising should have beenSilent Hill 2.
Snake Eater might be the most creatively-bankrupt quick buck remake I've seen yet.
What are they trying to do with their hands?Snake eaters I say.
![]()
mgs2??????????????????????????????Silent hill vs mgs2, mgs2 is a historic game, silent hill honors the horror genre.
mgs2??????????????????????????????
in my restless dreams i see that ocelot spinning revolver sequence...
AI has trouble reading text. I think it didn't recognise the symbol Delta and took it for a two. He's talking about everydaybeast, it's an inside joke about the user being AI.are you talking about me orEverydayBeast
Both reviewed well, so which one?
No they're not, they are great remakes!Both are great remasters !