hockeypuck
Member
1) Did those same studies look at the detriment to resident mental/physical health by working more 30 hour-shifts? Is it no wonder why the U.S. physician suicide rate is over 2 times higher than the population average? And are those gains in patient outcomes (an absolute difference of 0.60% in mortality, since I'm assuming you're basing off the Am J Med 2015 paper) worth it? Zero point six percent. 2.08% vs 2.68%. Whoopdee-freakin-do. I say no.Residents do work crazy hours, but studies show that having one doctor taking care of the patient and having less hand-offs to other doctors is actually better for patient outcomes; it balances out the possible sleep deprivation etc. On top of that, a lot of residents choose to work past the 80 hour limit (ex. surgery residents) because this is the time they have to develop their skills.
But overall I agree, healthcare in america needs some major reforms.
2) Yeah, "choose" is a very generous term here. The 80 hour work week is far more violated because shit needs to get done, and faaaar less likely because residents are actually volunteering to take a case. You make it sound like surgery cases would still get covered if residents adhered to the 80 hour limit.