• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[UK] New Piccadilly Circus sign hailed as BRILLIANT (it's not)

cormack12

Gold Member
185735614_10165002859335065_5056157058288471829_n.jpg


The artwork, designed by 83-year-old English painter David Hockney, was unveiled by London Mayor Sadiq Khan. It shows an updated version of the famous London Underground logo which has been purposefully designed to look like it's been drawn using Microsoft Paint.

The brand new Piccadilly Circus station sign, features the name of the famous station with the letter 's' added below the rest of the letters. It is part of a bigger campaign which will see lots of major art projects taking place across the UK capital.

The Mayor of London praised the artwork describing it as "brilliant", but not everyone has had the same reaction.

Lots of people took to social media to criticise the new design and some have even been inspired to recreate their very own signs for other London tube stations in the same style!



Artists other work:
 

YCoCg

Member
I thought this was done by a child!!?? It's done by an actual "artist"??? Ahh yes, the ironically it looks shit standard.
 

John Bilbo

Member
On his homepage he has some interesting landscape paintings, but this...
Awkward Smile GIF


Maybe he got this gig based on his long career.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Check out his works by decade in the link.

I saw better stuff from art students during high school. And unlike Hockney, kids can't take months to make one.

The London logo is the worst piece of work he's done.

Probably got paid a couple hundred grand for it too. Given how bad it is, there's a chance he didn't even do it and asked a a great granddaughter to do it.
 

Dr.Morris79

Gold Member
Check out his works by decade in the link.

I saw better stuff from art students during high school. And unlike Hockney, kids can't take months to make one.

The London logo is the worst piece of work he's done.

Probably got paid a couple hundred grand for it too. Given how bad it is, there's a chance he didn't even do it and asked a a great granddaughter to do it.
Yep. These people are taking the absolute piss.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Yep. These people are taking the absolute piss.
I wonder how much London got charged.

I know when our marketing department asks the ad agency artists to do some basic artwork (and that logo is basic), the marketing coordinators will get an invoice for about $2500. And if its not done right or looks like they didn't put any effort into it our people in charge of it will fight back get them to do it again for free or youre not getting paid for it. No free ride.

If it's super basic, someone in the marketing team with some photoshop skills will just do the art or packaging adjustments.

Knowing the gov, Hockney churned out a crap piece of art and London gov will just pay it on the spot like idiots.
 
Last edited:

dr_octagon

Banned
he is clearly phoning it in and it's disappointing. He has some decent works and this deliberate hackery is not qualify as art. london has been trolled again

QbbeJD5.jpg


making a point or an expression is one thing and, If this was a museum piece, we could have another discussion. what is the uniqueness which can celebrate and we can spot this is from a famous artist? they didn't even bother to use the technology to vector it or jazz it up.

it's profitting from basic MS paint skills and society is culturally poorer for it.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
he is clearly phoning it in and it's disappointing. He has some decent works and this deliberate hackery is not qualify as art. london has been trolled again

QbbeJD5.jpg


making a point or an expression is one thing and, If this was a museum piece, we could have another discussion. what is the uniqueness which can celebrate and we can spot this is from a famous artist? they didn't even bother to use the technology to vector it or jazz it up.

it's profitting from basic MS paint skills and society is culturally poorer for it.
That's government for ya. Wouldnt be surprised if they paid in full up front too.

If any company I worked for got ad agency artwork for products as bad these London examples, the agency would be gassed.

With endless taxpayer money, gov officials just smirk and write them a cheque for a job well done. Zero sense of budgeting or needing good bang for your buck like a typical company or person running a home.

And now all you people wonder why companies always strive for government contracts. It's basically free money. They'll pay anything and have zero sense of value for money paid. You'd think the organizations with the biggest budgets out there (gov) would be stock fill of expert penny pinchers and budgeteers, yet they got the worst.
 

xrnzaaas

Member
Jesus fuck, this isn't even cute when someone picks child's drawings and uses them as official logos and artwork. Even worse when it's something done by a mature person.
 
Last edited:

GHG

Member
It's sad, any time I read about news coming out of London these days I'm just glad I don't live there anymore.
 

GamingKaiju

Member
Why did TFL feel the need to change the sign from the original? They’re iconic signs.

I guess spending significant sums of money on art to distract from the social problems going on makes the City council leaders feel better.
 
Last edited:

MudoSkills

Volcano High Alumnus (Cum Laude)
If you had told me this has been done by a child or by Tracey Emin I would have believed you instantly.
 

Peter303

Member
This is how you channel public money into private hands. No wonder Sadiq Khan thinks it's brilliant. He and others involved with the project have pocketed a decent chunk of tax payers money.
 

Tschumi

Member
If i could live my life on talent which i believe in enough to barter into a would famous career I'd go to your house and doodle a cock on it using a big fake pixellated ms paint pointer icon

images



And sadiq kahn would say it's brilliant...


.... *Cracks up*
 
Last edited:

Dr.Morris79

Gold Member
The entire discussion about the validity of modern art can be summarized thus:

"I could have made that!"
"Yeah but you didn't"
It doesnt work like that, mind you. Any dickhead could make this, and does. It's just that they dont know the twats that can grease the palms for it to become 'brilliant work'
 
Top Bottom