UK police arrest woman after immigrant walks into her home

Hard to get a proper read as an outsider.

You will always have people who think that confronting life with a 'I'd like to buy the world a Coke' mentality can overcome any hurdle, misfortune or wrongdoing. I know, as a very naive youth I used to be one. But some people never grow out of it, either out of fear of ostracism, or moral hubris, or sheer dogged stubborn tribalism, and it's how we've ended up in the mess we're in.
 
Last edited:
This is so fucking retarted, why on Earth ANY country would want to import enough Muslims to become Muslim? What is more funny is that both "right wing" and left wing parties are doing the same shit.
Seems people are willing to set aside their sense of self-preservation so they don't get called racist on the internet.
 
Lucy Connelly made a tweet saying people could burn down migrant hotels "for all I care".

She was found guilty and sent to prison for 36 months.

Labour MP, Ricky Jones, was caught on video calling for far-right protesters' throats to be cut.

Found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder.

Tell me how this makes sense? How does one equal a quick sentence and 36 months in prison, when the other is let off? Are both not encouraging violence?
She wasn't found guilty. She was very badly advised and pled guilty in order to make it go away and get a slap on the wrist etc. Then got sent down for the full term etc. Same shit happened to a lot of people.
 
It makes absolute perfect sense in a two tier justice system. Every survival instinct molecule in the body tingles and tells you it must be so, that something is just not quite right here... However people like Three will still look you bare in the face and with absolute conviction say 2+2=5.

You're right. Those in power and those of a certain ideology will try and gaslight you and say it's all in our heads, or we're just falling for the propaganda of the other side. But the evidence of a two tier justice system in the UK is now incontrovertible.
 
She wasn't found guilty. She was very badly advised and pled guilty in order to make it go away and get a slap on the wrist etc. Then got sent down for the full term etc. Same shit happened to a lot of people.

That's even worse!

Please guily and we'll give you a slap on the wrists.

*pleads guilty

Enjoy 36 months in prison.
 
That's even worse!

Please guily and we'll give you a slap on the wrists.

*pleads guilty

Enjoy 36 months in prison.
Yup it's a disgrace, but it's not like America where the prosecution does deals. Some duty solicitor rocks up and tells em it's in their best interest etc and they dumb enough to believe the bugger.
 
Seems people are willing to set aside their sense of self-preservation so they don't get called racist on the internet.
Some people just actually don't seem to have self preservation. This isn't even the first time in history this has even happened. Istanbul wasn't always called that. Its amazing how many people will deny something until it happens and then half of those will develop the Stockholm Syndrome and accept domination. Sadly I think the people standing on the beach waving at the Vikings are too numerous.
 
You're right. Those in power and those of a certain ideology will try and gaslight you and say it's all in our heads, or we're just falling for the propaganda of the other side. But the evidence of a two tier justice system in the UK is now incontrovertible.

The simplest answer is often the truth.

These fuckers hate the country, they hate it's people, they hate it's history, they hate the culture and absolutely above all they hate the flag. Once that enters the mind it all makes perfect sense. They'll tear it down and recreate it from year 0.

Sanctimonious, smug bastards have had all aspects of the media and institutions behind them for decades. But now it's all coming to a head as people are being financially bled, our towns and cities are dying, the crime is out of control, the police are failing in their basic duties, the borders are non existent, women and kids aren't safe, they simply can't hide it any more.
 
She wasn't found guilty. She was very badly advised and pled guilty in order to make it go away and get a slap on the wrist etc. Then got sent down for the full term etc. Same shit happened to a lot of people.
Yep.

But that's such an indication of our society that no one is really paying attention, to anything. Until its time to pay the piper and you're a rabbit in the headlights, no matter which side of the aisle you fall on.
 
This is the sort of story where you find out six months later that her place was an illegal grow house and the guy was a twelve year old illegal immigrant slave she had locked in the basement tending to the plants.
 
Guns are legal in America for anyone to own (in most states)

Not so in the UK and most (but not all!) EU countries

Guns are legal in the UK, as long as you have a firearm license. However, these are difficult to obtain, so you might as well say all guns are illegal.

Even if you had a shotgun and you shot a home intruder, you'd likely go to prison anyway for excessive violence.
 
Lucy Connelly made a tweet saying people could burn down migrant hotels "for all I care".

She was found guilty and sent to prison for 36 months.

Labour MP, Ricky Jones, was caught on video calling for far-right protesters' throats to be cut.

Found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder.

Tell me how this makes sense? How does one equal a quick sentence and 36 months in prison, when the other is let off? Are both not encouraging violence?
She plead guilty and admitted to trying to incite racial hatred. She probably would have been fine if her tweet wasn't part of a false narrative spread online about an immigrant being responsible for a terror attack, and there hadn't been mass violence nationwide because of that false narrative.
 
The problem is 90% of journalism, both online and print requires scandal to sell, and so stories are crafted (or in the case of political propaganda channels like GB news) outright lies are told and repeated between like minded organisations.

The result is the country is numb to practically any claim as we hear hundreds of BS stories a day. Some of the nonsense and takes in this thread is evidence it works.

The catcalling example is clear overreach and a waste of limited resources, but when repeated with fake pictures, fake exaggerated tales.. the signal to noise ratio renders it a non-story.

But in the age of populism this is a happy consequence, as grinding grievances into outrage is more profitable and politically expedient for grifters and their offshore press owners than any effort (or God forbid success) in actually tackling the issues.

The truth about the UK? No news or social media poster is your champion, no opposition party offers credible scrutiny. You are at the mercy of whoever is in power and the hope they have the competancy and courage to deal with decades long issues in a few years between elections. And we have f**k all chance of that!
 
Last edited:
Even if you had a shotgun and you shot a home intruder, you'd likely go to prison anyway for excessive violence.
You might be arrested, and it probably isn't worth it for all the trouble, but I'm pretty sure that the criminal justice system would be heavily on your side and you wouldn't get a criminal record.
 
The problem is 90% of journalism, both online and print requires scandal to sell, and so stories are crafted (or in the case of political propaganda channels like GB news) outright lies are told and repeated between like minded organisations.

The result is the country is numb to practically any claim as we hear hundreds of BS stories a day. Some of the nonsense and takes in this thread is are evidence it works.

The catcalling example is clear overreach and a waste of limited resources, but when repeated with fake pictures, fake exaggerated tales.. the signal to noise ratio renders it a non-story.

But in the age of populism this is a happy consequence, as grinding grievances into outrage is more profitable and politically expedient for grifters and their offshore press owners than any effort (or God forbid success) in actually tackling the issues.

The truth about the UK? No news or social media poster is your champion, no opposition party offers credible scrutiny. You are at the mercy of whoever is in power and the hope they have the competancy and courage to deal with decades long issues in a few years between elections. And we have f**k all chance of that!
The very fact you picked out GB News as propaganda tells me everything I know. It is, but so is everything else. People have become numb, not because of the news but of literal events experienced every day from muggings to abuse. Someone just got kicked to death outside their pub not far from where I live. Imagine telling the family of that man, it didn't happen and you only believe he's dead because they read the Daily Mail. I worked in a shop and witnessed theft every day. My brother was even punched in the face when he tried to stop someone stealing. People put far to much emphasis on the influence on the media and not enough on the actual things that people experience that is dismissed and it will be their undoing. There is a place even where I live that locals refer to as the R*pe Bridge. Imagine telling somebody who was attacked there it was due to GB News.
 
The very fact you picked out GB News as propaganda tells me everything I know. It is, but so is everything else. People have become numb, not because of the news but of literal events experienced every day from muggings to abuse. Someone just got kicked to death outside their pub not far from where I live. Imagine telling the family of that man, it didn't happen and you only believe he's dead because they read the Daily Mail. I worked in a shop and witnessed theft every day. My brother was even punched in the face when he tried to stop someone stealing. People put far to much emphasis on the influence on the media and not enough on the actual things that people experience that is dismissed and it will be their undoing. There is a place even where I live that locals refer to as the R*pe Bridge. Imagine telling somebody who was attacked there it was due to GB News.

Dont bother. People like this are either complicit or programmed to become NPCs, so they will only learn when shit hits them at a personal level.

As other poster said, we are witnessing whole governments and politicians adhereing to the rules of transnational organizations like the DAVOS forum, whose goals are AGAINST the countries and the people they preside over. So, in the literal sense of the word, these politicians are traitors. They should be removed from their positions effect immediately.

In southern Europe it's not as bad as in UK, but it's becoming progressively awful, with the same actors involved, the same criminality problems, the same state propaganda and the nazi-calling.

Disingenous posters like that one have lived in lalaland all their lives and they believe our bubble of peace is the norm in the rest of the world. It's NOT. The West has many sworn enemies who won't stop trying to destroy us. They even say it out loud, it's not like they are concealing anything. Russia is the prime example of this and we are dumb for not listening to what they are actually saying.
 
Last edited:
The very fact you picked out GB News as propaganda tells me everything I know. It is, but so is everything else. People have become numb, not because of the news but of literal events experienced every day from muggings to abuse. Someone just got kicked to death outside their pub not far from where I live. Imagine telling the family of that man, it didn't happen and you only believe he's dead because they read the Daily Mail. I worked in a shop and witnessed theft every day. My brother was even punched in the face when he tried to stop someone stealing. People put far to much emphasis on the influence on the media and not enough on the actual things that people experience that is dismissed and it will be their undoing. There is a place even where I live that locals refer to as the R*pe Bridge. Imagine telling somebody who was attacked there it was due to GB News.
That is not at all what I said. Signal to noise ratio means true stories are drown out by a lot of bullshit ones. Some true are co-opted and regurgitated / altered in clickbait fashion and are rendered indistinguishable from the noise.

GB news is not a credible source, and for each right wing rag I could equally name propagandist left wing ones too (such as the Morning Star).

The fact you jumped on criticism of the state of gbnews and assumed I was therefore dismissive of victims or real life issues tells me all I need to know. You have missed the broad point and assumed I was engaging in the political football I was in fact criticising.
 
Last edited:
Dont bother. People like this are either complicit or programmed to become NPCs, so they will only learn when shit hits them at a personal level.

As other poster said, we are witnessing whole governments and politicians adhereing to the rules of transnational organizations like the DAVOS forum, whose goals are AGAINST the countries and the people they preside over. So, in the literal sense of the word, these politicians are traitors. They should be removed from their positions effect immediately.

In southern Europe it's not as bad as in UK, but it's becoming progressively awful, with the same actors involved, the same criminality problems, the same state propaganda and the nazi-calling.

Disingenous posters like that one have lived in lalaland all their lives and they believe our bubble of peace is the norm in the rest of the world. It's NOT. The West has many sworn enemies who won't stop trying to destroy us. They even say it out loud, it's not like they are concealing anything. Russia is the prime example of this and we are dumb not to listen to what they are actually saying.
No, I have been the victim of crime and police injustice. I also have a lot more experience of business and politics than I expect many people would ordinarily have . My criticism was of the whole state of things, but because I am not banging the drum of your choice I am a disingenuous NPC?

That betrays a lack of maturity, and is an example of why things will not improve. People treat their politics like their support of their football team.
 
No,
That is not at all what I said. Signal to noise ratio means true stories are drown out by a lot of bullshit ones. Some true are co-opted and regurgitated / altered in clickbait fashion and are rendered indistinguishable from the noise.

GB news is not a credible source, and for each right wing rag I could equally name propagandist left wing ones to (such as the Morning Star).

The fact you jumped on criticism of the state of gbnews and assumed I was therefore dismissive of victims or real life issues tells me all I need to know. You have missed the broad point and assumed I was engaging in the political football I was in fact criticising.
No, I got your point and it's wrong. Just mentioning GB News and no others shows what information you don't believe. You can backtrack now if you want because you have shown your bias. I don't believe any media. I believe what I see with my eyes. If I see 10 homeless people and whichever source I look at says it's one, I don't believe it. It's not the media. People want it to be because they don't want to accept how bad it is for so many people. I have no doubt Reform will win here. Not because of the media but because when I was younger there was guy called Phil the Tramp because he was the only homeless person. Now there is at least a dozen by the train station.
 
No,
No, I got your point and it's wrong. Just mentioning GB News and no others shows what information you don't believe. You can backtrack now if you want because you have shown your bias. I don't believe any media. I believe what I see with my eyes. If I see 10 homeless people and whichever source I look at says it's one, I don't believe it. It's not the media. People want it to be because they don't want to accept how bad it is for so many people. I have no doubt Reform will win here. Not because of the media but because when I was younger there was guy called Phil the Tramp because he was the only homeless person. Now there is at least a dozen by the train station.
I don't believe GB news, correct. I single them out because they have a heavy online and tv presence but have happily named another. From your statement you also don't believe them.

Who is claiming we don't have a housing and homelessness crisis?

It is literally accepted by all parties and widely reported that the costs are becoming unsustainable for councils.
 
The very fact you picked out GB News as propaganda tells me everything I know. It is, but so is everything else. People have become numb, not because of the news but of literal events experienced every day from muggings to abuse. Someone just got kicked to death outside their pub not far from where I live. Imagine telling the family of that man, it didn't happen and you only believe he's dead because they read the Daily Mail. I worked in a shop and witnessed theft every day. My brother was even punched in the face when he tried to stop someone stealing. People put far to much emphasis on the influence on the media and not enough on the actual things that people experience that is dismissed and it will be their undoing. There is a place even where I live that locals refer to as the R*pe Bridge. Imagine telling somebody who was attacked there it was due to GB News.
But all that stuff has always existed. The UK has always had a problem with random violence as a 'fun' national past-time. I grew up in a 99% 'white British' area - and the threat of random violence on a night out was always present and occurred to myself or friends on multiple occasions.
The main problem in all of this is the rhetoric on one side and the gaslighting on the other. Which of these you object too the most tends to drive you towards the other - its nearly always not a belief that one side is right but a belief that one side is definitely wrong.
 
wgd20kjuNHHTMU0O.jpg


The home invader in question.

And rumor has it he has been reported again today for trying to get into another home.
You can't deny he wouldn't make an absolutely kick arse Sith though

n1ovpgC8cAQs9jEr.png
 
But all that stuff has always existed. The UK has always had a problem with random violence as a 'fun' national past-time. I grew up in a 99% 'white British' area - and the threat of random violence on a night out was always present and occurred to myself or friends on multiple occasions.
The main problem in all of this is the rhetoric on one side and the gaslighting on the other. Which of these you object too the most tends to drive you towards the other - its nearly always not a belief that one side is right but a belief that one side is definitely wrong.
Yeah but English is the problem of the English. People from other parts of the world is not.

People in England shouldn't be killed and raped by Africans and middle-easterns.

It's not preventable to stop English, but it's 100% preventable to stop non-English.

If immigration leads to any form of violence it should be stopped. Politicians should not be willing to sacrifice their own people in any degree to placate immigrants and their children.
 
But all that stuff has always existed. The UK has always had a problem with random violence as a 'fun' national past-time. I grew up in a 99% 'white British' area - and the threat of random violence on a night out was always present and occurred to myself or friends on multiple occasions.
The main problem in all of this is the rhetoric on one side and the gaslighting on the other. Which of these you object too the most tends to drive you towards the other - its nearly always not a belief that one side is right but a belief that one side is definitely wrong.
My issue is that where I live there was one homeless person and now there are dozens. Needles everywhere. Infact one of the homeless guys was murdered by somebody setting fire to the shack he built. However, when you bring up this stuff, people say its the media as if everyone has dementia. It always has been bad if you attacked on a night out, no one denied it happened. People weren't as readily disregarded before. What makes it worse is that my Uncle is the Mayor of the town where I live and what he says in private and to the public is completely different. He knows it's terrible but he won't say it in public. So the media lies, the politicians lie and the only person to believe is yourself. The media is a convenient scape goat to avoid blame for your own failure.
 
My issue is that where I live there was one homeless person and now there are dozens. Needles everywhere. Infact one of the homeless guys was murdered by somebody setting fire to the shack he built. However, when you bring up this stuff, people say its the media as if everyone has dementia. It always has been bad if you attacked on a night out, no one denied it happened. People weren't as readily disregarded before. What makes it worse is that my Uncle is the Mayor of the town where I live and what he says in private and to the public is completely different. He knows it's terrible but he won't say it in public. So the media lies, the politicians lie and the only person to believe is yourself. The media is a convenient scape goat to avoid blame for your own failure.
Thats what I mean - people telling you nothing is happening when you can clearly see that things have changed makes you instinctively start looking for someone who recognizes what you are seeing. Problem is - that sends you directly towards the rabid racists and xenophobes.
Alternatively - you read a constant diatribe about immigrants that conflates them with anyone not white and ascribed all societies ills to them - and it doesnt match the people you know. So you start defending the good people you know and get pulled into the bigger 'activist' conversation and start defending or pushing back against anything 'anti-immigration' even when it is justified.
 
Poor old Ricky. Seeing those imagined razor blades really did on a number on him eh

Next time I imagine some fantasy, I'll be sure to go infront of thousands of people asking for those I don't agree with to have their throats slit publicly, hell, especially if im a Councillor..

It's the done thing, it seems 🤷‍♂️
So what was he talking about then regarding the train then? Ok let's assume he imagined it. He got summoned to court for saying somthing he shouldn't have and said he was wrong and did not intend to stir up hatred or violence. what did the state do wrong?
Lucy Connelly made a tweet saying people could burn down migrant hotels "for all I care".

She was found guilty and sent to prison for 36 months.

Labour MP, Ricky Jones, was caught on video calling for far-right protesters' throats to be cut.

Found not guilty of encouraging violent disorder.

Tell me how this makes sense? How does one equal a quick sentence and 36 months in prison, when the other is let off? Are both not encouraging violence?
Because Lucy was an idiot who had no remorse for inciting racial hatred or violence for those who had nothing to do with the murder:
"both the prosecution and her own barrister agreed she "intended to incite serious violence".

"they weren't arguing this was a silly tweet and she should be let off - her own counsel agreed this was a serious issue".

At her appeal, Connolly claimed that while she accepted she intended to stir up racial hatred, she always denied trying to incite violence.

But Lord Justice Holroyde said in a judgement this week the evidence "clearly shows that she was well aware of what she was admitting".

Her own barrister said this and she said she intended to stir up racial hatred. Had she shown remorse, said it was wrong to say this and she did not intend to stir up hatred she would have had no problem. That's how it "makes sense", not because there is some two tier bullshit. She said she wanted to do this and did not believe what she was doing was wrong.

Now the question is what would you prefer for the state? Some dumbasses like Abu Hamsa and the Right wing nuts to incite hatred and violence freely or to tell the public to fucking behave themselves and be decent human beings?
 
So what was he talking about then regarding the train then? Ok let's assume he imagined it. He got summoned to court for saying somthing he shouldn't have and said he was wrong and did not intend to stir up hatred or violence. what did the state do wrong?
Nothing. The state does nothing wrong.

You're right. It is fine.
 
So what was he talking about then regarding the train then? Ok let's assume he imagined it. He got summoned to court for saying somthing he shouldn't have and said he was wrong and did not intend to stir up hatred or violence. what did the state do wrong?

Because Lucy was an idiot who had no remorse for inciting racial hatred or violence for those who had nothing to do with the murder:


Her own barrister said this and she said she intended to stir up racial hatred. Had she shown remorse, said it was wrong to say this and she did not intend to stir up hatred she would have had no problem. That's how it "makes sense", not because there is some two tier bullshit. She said she wanted to do this and did not believe what she was doing was wrong.

Now the question is what would you prefer for the state? Some dumbasses like Abu Hamsa and the Right wing nuts to incite hatred and violence freely or to tell the public to fucking behave themselves and be decent human beings?
She was angry because the guy who did it was african and she knows the migrant hotels are helping bringing more non-western immigrants in and more people are gonna die because of it.

So she lashed out, something people do on the daily.

She didn't "intend" anything, it was a silly angry tweet, and everybody knows it, but they wanted a scapegoat.
 
Because Lucy was an idiot who had no remorse for inciting racial hatred or violence for those who had nothing to do with the murder:

I see.

They were both inciting violence, but because Ricky Jones showed remorse, he gets let off the hook.

Makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
So she lashed out, something people do on the daily.

She didn't "intend" anything, it was a silly angry tweet, and everybody knows it, but they wanted a scapegoat.
She said she intended it. She said so herself. Her own barrister was saying this was an issue because she had no remorse or admission of wrong doing ie something you would do when "lashing out" at that moment. She said she intended to incite racial hatred and showed no remorse in hindsight.

She was angry because the guy who did it was african and she knows the migrant hotels are helping bringing more non-western immigrants in and more people are gonna die because of it.

Which is what's stupid in the first place and something any decent person should know is wrong. Could you imagine somebody asking for your place to be burnt down because you shared the same ethnicity as some unrelated criminals? The country is better than that.

I see.

They were both inciting violence, but because Ricky Jones showed remorse, he gets let off the hook.

Makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up.

Well I'm glad you now understand that the penal system is about rehabilitation and not just trying to fuck people over because you don't like them.
 
Last edited:
She was angry because the guy who did it was african and she knows the migrant hotels are helping bringing more non-western immigrants in and more people are gonna die because of it.

So she lashed out, something people do on the daily.

She didn't "intend" anything, it was a silly angry tweet, and everybody knows it, but they wanted a scapegoat.
I read that she pleaded guilty to the charges and applied to appeal saying she didn't understand what it meant (admission of her intent), which the judges didn't accept, although they did accept the feeling brought back up from the loss of her own son as mitigation although noted she didn't express sympathy at the time.

By the outcome of the other case being compared, she may have been better off going to jury trial as he did, because despite the clear wrongs there, the jury could let him off.

Two wrongs don't make a right, and she clearly feels this is an injustice. However pleading reduces the sentence (she will only serve 40%) and sometimes people plead guilty for the certainty of a shorter sanction than rolling the dice. By design that means truth and justice are traded for time and cost.

I personally feel social media companies should be treated as traditional publishers rather than all blame ending up on individuals - especially when their algorithm pushes antagonistic / misinformed posts and encourages people to react. This however would result in self imposed censorship of users (as editors exercise on their articles). The other option is personal accountability - which her case is an example of occuring in the real world.
 
Last edited:


I can't imagine living in the UK in 2025 it really seems like a parody of a human society


If this really is the officer they used, doesn't that speak to exactly what men find attractive? Why didn't they use some heffer with blue hair? Oh because no one would look at her twice.
Even in their "progressive" crusade they have to capitulate to reality.
 
If this really is the officer they used, doesn't that speak to exactly what men find attractive? Why didn't they use some heffer with blue hair? Oh because no one would look at her twice.
Even in their "progressive" crusade they have to capitulate to reality.
No it isn't the officer, it's BS. The scheme itself is true and is a complete waste of resources and an example of overreach. I'd be demanding to know the cost of that scheme and cut their budget accordingly.
 
Manchester is on its way to becoming a massive shit hole and corporate eyesore full of glass towers.
Manchester is a mixed one, there's still a lot of nice places but man the city centre is chaos these days with construction everywhere, homeless camps, expensive as fuck prices and as for all those glass towers popping they're mainly empty, owned by Chinese companies, which oddly enough seems to be a big thing, most housing is bought up by these Chinese companies and rent prices are raised. That's the main issue with Manchester at the moment, apartments and office towers being built up but being priced out of reach for the majority.
 
She said she intended it. She said so herself. Her own barrister was saying this was an issue because she had no remorse or admission of wrong doing ie something you would do when "lashing out" at that moment. She said she intended to incite racial hatred and showed no remorse in hindsight.



Which is what's stupid in the first place and something any decent person should know is wrong. Could you imagine somebody asking for your place to be burnt down because you shared the same ethnicity as some unrelated criminals? The country is better than that.



Well I'm glad you now understand that the penal system is about rehabilitation and not just trying to fuck people over because you don't like them.
She actually used the words racial hatred? or did they? you have to take into context that kids were killed and she is furious.

It's not unrelated criminals, they are all part of the same system. The hotels facilitate mass immigration.

It's completely natural to be angry at immigrant institutions and the left when people are getting butchered in the streets.
 
She said she intended it. She said so herself. Her own barrister was saying this was an issue because she had no remorse or admission of wrong doing ie something you would do when "lashing out" at that moment. She said she intended to incite racial hatred and showed no remorse in hindsight.

She did regret after, something taken into consideration with her judgement.

Was Ricky Jones just lashing out then? Just the heat of the moment. Is that all it takes to let off without prison. Saying you regret your actions straight away.

Well I'm glad you now understand that the penal system is about rehabilitation and not just trying to fuck people over because you don't like them.

I don't want to fuck over Ricky Jones. I want a system that makes sense. If Ricky Jones and Lucy Connelly are both inciting violence (they both were) then both should be behind bars, no?
 
She plead guilty and admitted to trying to incite racial hatred. She probably would have been fine if her tweet wasn't part of a false narrative spread online about an immigrant being responsible for a terror attack, and there hadn't been mass violence nationwide because of that false narrative.
You think if she had said it following one of the many attacks by immigrants she would have been fine? Lol.
 
Imagine that you live in a peaceful country, with barely any criminality, with laws tailor made for a non-aggressive population, with full social security and safe streets.

Then, over a few years, hundreds of thousands of widlings enter your place PAID WITH YOUR TAX MONEY, your streets are no longer safe, and criminality rises up to 90%. You can't even go on fucking vacation because you fear having lost your fucking house to ilegal occupants, unless you are a politian or a soccer player and can afford private ex-army security guards.

Imagine that you go from a near paradise to a hellhole in less than a decade. And then, have some idiot calling you racist or bigot or whatever the fuck else because you can't take it anymore.
 
You think if she had said it following one of the many attacks by immigrants she would have been fine? Lol.
You dont think that there were riots across the country based on the spreading of false information - that her comments directly fed in to - had an impact?
Without the actual violence I doubt this ever got anywhere near a court.
 
I don't follow the goings ons of the UK all that closely. The stuff I do see in today's age it's hard to tell what's real and what's propaganda or isolated incidents not indicative of a larger issue. So I don't really have an opinion on the overall picture of what's going on over there. I listen to the Triggernometry pod though and I can say Konstantin and Francis are quite pessimistic and believe things are quite bad over there now. So much so they think the UK is getting close to a breaking point and how unhappy the public is. Whether or not they are right, I don't know.

Something similar happened in some American cities though. Squatters would go into homes, create fake paperwork, and local police wouldn't do anything. On some occasions, the homeowners would throw them out and got arrested for doing so, while the squatter got to stay in the home while the actual homeowner was jailed. Some cities have since closed these squatter loopholes.
 
Top Bottom