may do this. marks and spencers sell really good slippers and my i've almost worn through my current pair.Sir Fragula said:Forget Greggs, go to Marks and Spencers and buy their Sweet Chilli Chicken with Firebang Rice.
SLIPPERS CREW ASSEMBLE!
may do this. marks and spencers sell really good slippers and my i've almost worn through my current pair.Sir Fragula said:Forget Greggs, go to Marks and Spencers and buy their Sweet Chilli Chicken with Firebang Rice.
Anyhoo, speaking as someone almost entirely ignorant of politics (but with a growing interest), I've always found this PM-sharing thing Brown and Blair have going on a bit dodgy. They say it was always their plan to have a go each, how is it ok to have a PM noone voted for? You would think if a current PM steps down there should be a new election right away. Apparently this is the 6th time this has happened, as well. Not cool!
June 3rdWhen is the last date that the election can be called anyway? It has to be soon, surely?
Dooraven said:Being PM, for dummies
moojito said:The episode of Absolute power which dealt with ID cards was pretty funny. I think TV could use a program like that or drop the dead donkey again to get the simple folk like myself interested in politics. I'd have to admit my current interest is driven by watching the west wing, but I feel that's like someone running up to Thom Yorke and saying "I love your music, creep is such a great song!".
industrian said:...and as I go to bed tonight knowing I'll have kimchi and rice again for lunch tomorrow I just want to say this: kiss my ass you Greggs eating motherfuckers. I hope you choke to death on your sausage rolls. :|
Sir Fragula said:Forget Greggs, go to Marks and Spencers and buy their Sweet Chilli Chicken with Firebang Rice.
Falch said:Also, in the current parliament, there are five Sinn Fein MPs who refuse to take the oath of allegiance to the Queen and as a result are not entitled to vote.
mclem said:So basically, if you vote in Sinn Fein, you're asking to not be represented?
I bet they would if they were in a close enough hung parliament!
Orgun said:Wait, The Thick of It is a series? I've seen the film with those characters but didnt know there was a series![]()
It's on sale - £2.50!Meus Renaissance said:Not all of us can afford M & S meals
Lucky for you, you're on the right side of the border.Kentpaul said:Free college and free healthcare is all i care about.
SmokyDave said:Lucky for you, you're on the right side of the border.
I'll never understand why prescription costs, tuition fees etc. aren't standardised across the Union. Might as well devolve Westminster into an English parliament and everyone do their own thing.
industrian said:Most people forget that it was the Conservative votes that took us to war.
http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-18&number=118
SecretBonusPoint said:Watch The Thick Of It instead.
http://i36.tinypic.com/w1xxmd.jpg[IMG]
It is uncanny how each season will depict something that has yet to happen in the political media circus, but often does.[/QUOTE]
The West Wing makes you want to become a politician, The Thick of It makes you want to burn politics to the ground and start a fresh. I think he is looking for something from the former category.
SmokyDave said:Lucky for you, you're on the right side of the border.
I'll never understand why prescription costs, tuition fees etc. aren't standardised across the Union. Might as well devolve Westminster into an English parliament and everyone do their own thing.
Dax01 said:I'm glad this thread is up. I browsed the first four pages and outside Chinner's first post summoning the political parties and some other posts made by others, I have no idea what anybody's talking about.:lol The more I read the more I'll learn I guess.
I've been meaning to ask some questions about the UK, to get some perspective about a couple of things. In comparison to the United States, how high's your national debt? Are you guys currently running on a federal deficit? For those that have a good grasp of the politics in the UK and the US, Chinner said that the Tories are more conservative than the Labor party, but are they as conservative, more conservative, or about the same as the Republicans in the US?
Thanks in advance.
Dax01 said:I'm glad this thread is up. I browsed the first four pages and outside Chinner's first post summoning the political parties and some other posts made by others, I have no idea what anybody's talking about.:lol
I've been meaning to ask some questions about the UK, to get some perspective about a couple of things. In comparison to the United States, how high's your national debt? Are you guys currently running on a federal deficit? For those that have a good grasp of the politics in the UK and the US, Chinner said that the Tories are more conservative than the Labor party, but are they as conservative, more conservative, or about the same as the Republicans in the US?
Thanks in advance.
SecretBonusPoint said:Watch The Thick Of It instead.
![]()
It is uncanny how each season will depict something that has yet to happen in the political media circus, but often does.
Put all these things together, and the state were in doesnt look peachy. The imminence of the general election doesnt help. Broadly speaking, the circumstances are such that it shouldnt much matter who wins the election, not in economic terms. The economic realities are harsh and are likely to determine most of what the new government does. Labour have promised to cut the deficit in half within four years. They havent spelled out how they are going to do it, and until recently Gordon Brown was talking about Tory cuts versus Labour investment which, given what he must know about what the figures mean, is jaw-droppingly cynical. The reality is that the budget, and the explicit promises of both parties, imply a commitment to cuts of about 11 per cent across the board. Both parties, however, have said that they will ring-fence spending on health, education and overseas development. Plug in those numbers and we are looking at cuts everywhere else of 16 per cent. (By the way, a two-year freeze in NHS spending which is what Labour have talked about would be its sharpest contraction in 60 years.)
Cuts of that magnitude have never been achieved in this country. Mrs Thatcher managed to cut some areas of public spending to zero growth; the difference between that and a contraction of 16 per cent is unimaginable. The Institute for Fiscal Studies which admittedly specialises in bad news of this kind thinks the numbers are, even in this dire prognosis, too optimistic. It makes less optimistic assumptions about the growth of the economy, preferring not to accept the Treasurys rose-coloured figure of 2.75 per cent. Plugging these less cheerful growth estimates into its fiscal model, the guesstimate for the cuts, if the ring-fencing is enforced, is from 18 to 24 per cent. What does that mean? According to Rowena Crawford, an IFS economist, quoted in the FT: For the Ministry of Defence an 18 per cent cut means something on the scale of no longer employing the army. The FT then extrapolates:
At the transport ministry, an 18 per cent reduction would take out more than a third of the departments grant to Network Rail; a 24 per cent reduction is about equivalent to ending all current and capital expenditure on roads. At the Ministry of Justice an 18 per cent reduction broadly equates to closing all the courts, a 24 per cent cut to shutting two-thirds of all prisons.
mrklaw said:i'm confused by the economy and debt.
we have had years of big spending increases, with relatively managable debt. Now its massive all of a sudden.
Is that purely gaps in tax raising, or is it primarily due to bailing out banks etc?
If the latter, I thought most of that was buying up bad loans etc, and in theory that'll get paid back over the years?
industrian said:Are you American or do you have your browser's spell checker set to American English?
And that's Manpower. I worked for my local government before moving to Korea, and I knew a bunch of clericals who were contracted to us by them. All the smart ones negotiated proper contracts with the government once they had proven themselves.
Empty said:Bank bailouts are part of it, then hugely reduced tax revenues thanks to the recession, increased government outlays through way more unemployment benefits being paid out, hugely expensive stimulus packages of various kinds: direct stimulus, VAT cut, cash for clunkers. Then that's on top of the government debt before the recession which wasn't insubstantial; Brown/Blair/New Labour inherited a deficit of 43.76% of GDP in 1997, which they reduced to 38.41% in 2006 though this was more down to the large economic growth as spending increased, and then in 2007 we invested heavily in the NHS bringing it up to 44.80%, which is manageable but quite large, but with the impact of the recession it becomes huge.
Note: Some people will argue that those figures are on the low side as national debt numbers do not include all PFI contract costs and pension liabilities which will require borrowing in the future.
That's just how we roll.Nexus Zero said:Dax, I'd probably go as far as to say that our Conservatives are even less conservative than the Democrats on the majority of issues.
Dax01 said:I'm glad this thread is up. I browsed the first four pages and outside Chinner's first post summoning the political parties and some other posts made by others, I have no idea what anybody's talking about.:lol The more I read the more I'll learn I guess.
I've been meaning to ask some questions about the UK, to get some perspective about a couple of things. In comparison to the United States, how high's your national debt? Are you guys currently running on a federal deficit? For those that have a good grasp of the politics in the UK and the US, Chinner said that the Tories are more conservative than the Labor party, but are they as conservative, more conservative, or about the same as the Republicans in the US?
Thanks in advance.
Yes, I actually believe they may have been counselled to have a baby at this particular time. Tin hat I know...
ghst said:when the whole hoon hewitt heresy broke out my first thought was "didn't this just happen in the last episode?". i mean they're usually pretty prophetic but that was a whole new level of uncanny, especially with the slow trickle of whiplashed support for brown.
Dax01 said:I'm glad this thread is up. I browsed the first four pages and outside Chinner's first post summoning the political parties and some other posts made by others, I have no idea what anybody's talking about.:lol The more I read the more I'll learn I guess.
I've been meaning to ask some questions about the UK, to get some perspective about a couple of things. In comparison to the United States, how high's your national debt? Are you guys currently running on a federal deficit? For those that have a good grasp of the politics in the UK and the US, Chinner said that the Tories are more conservative than the Labor party, but are they as conservative, more conservative, or about the same as the Republicans in the US?
Thanks in advance.
defel1111 said:I think my main issue regarding debt is that the debt burden we have had in the past decade has been sustainable, but, at some point we need to recognise that the government cannot keep spending and increasing the public sector so much (look at Greece). Obviously this is the Tories' main argument but Im not entirely convinced that Labour will be trigger happy with spending if they were re-elected. Its almost a non-issue. As you say when the economy grows again the deficit will fall. Once the "good times" return and people and politicians put on the rose-tinted glasses again the deficit will just fade into the background as a major political issue.
Chinner said:The fear, which I think someone mentioned above, is that most of the younger generation (teens, people in their early 20s like me) weren't alive during the 80s and didn't know how bad things got when the Tories were in power. This has given the Tories (I suspect) a boost from the younger population, and that most of the younger generation are anti-labour/left. I wish someone would do research into it cause it's genuinely interesting question.
Chinner said:The fear, which I think someone mentioned above, is that most of the younger generation (teens, people in their early 20s like me) weren't alive during the 80s and didn't know how bad things got when the Tories were in power. This has given the Tories (I suspect) a boost from the younger population, and that most of the younger generation are anti-labour/left. I wish someone would do research into it cause it's genuinely interesting question.
jas0nuk said:I apologise if you are offended that I implied you had forgotten about the 45 minute claim, but you surely accept that all MPs, Labour and Conservative, voted for the war on the merits of the "sexed up dossier" which painted Iraq as a huge threat to the welfare of the UK. The real question is why high-ranking Cabinet figures such as Jack Straw, who knew that the legality of the war was questionable, did not speak up. I suspect it is because he was more interested in his career - he would have had to resign if he went against Blair.