You are not the only one.funkmasterb said:Tell me I'm not the only person who sees a steady erosion of freedoms?
You are not the only one.funkmasterb said:Tell me I'm not the only person who sees a steady erosion of freedoms?
Could have sworn there was more to the story than was first reported - like he was some violent nut job?funkmasterb said:I don't read the daily mail, it's a rag.
http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/...nding-gun/article-1509082-detail/article.html
^Immediate arrest following returning weapon to police.
Not black and white as you make it, BritCop explans it well. The guy is pretty foolish. He finds the gun, takes it into his home for awhile (which is dodgy), and then walks in public with it before making an unannounced appearance at the police station. Reporting it to the police is pretty basic. Besides, I don't see what's the problem considering the very article you link says walks free from court.http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/n...l/article.html
^Immediate arrest following returning weapon to police.
I remember this story prompting allot of discussion here. Basically, he managed to get the guy out of his house, which is fine cause it's self defence. Then he and his brother chase after him, off their property, and beat the shit out of them. Self defence laws are pretty well defined and that shit isn't covered in it. If I remember correctly, it's actually quite ironic because the thief was so injured that he couldn't testify and he got away free (or something).
Doesn't really fit the definition of nanny state at all.
funkmasterb said:
funkmasterb said:So...some questions...
Why does every story coming out of the UK sound like you're building a real life 1984 there?
Why can't you kick the ass of someone breaking into your home?
Why do town councils sound like just really shitty HOA's?
If you find a gun, and return it to the police, why would you be arrested?
I just don't fucking get it. It sounds horrible from a personal freedoms perspective.
Chinner said:I remember this story prompting allot of discussion here. Basically, he managed to get the guy out of his house, which is fine cause it's self defence. Then he and his brother chase after him, off their property, and beat the shit out of them. Self defence laws are pretty well defined and that shit isn't covered in it. If I remember correctly, it's actually quite ironic because the thief was so injured that he couldn't testify and he got away free (or something).
quiteSir Fragula said:Could have sworn there was more to the story than was first reported - like he was some violent nut job?
A man accused of beating a DVLA inspector with a broom handle as walked free from court after claiming his alleged victim had exaggarated the incident.
Inspector Hayden Hart had claimed he was attakced my Paul Clarke, 26, as he patrolled Wood Street, Merstham, checking parked cars for out-of-date tax discs.
The inspector said he was clubbed repeatedly by his attacker, who warned him: "If you come near my vehicle again, I'll break your f****** legs."
But Mr Clarke, of Wood Street, Merstham, walked free from the Crown Court at Guildford after winning his appeal against conviction for assault by beating at Redhill Magistrates Court on March 12 this year.
funkmasterb said:So...some questions...
Why does every story coming out of the UK sound like you're building a real life 1984 there?
Why can't you kick the ass of someone breaking into your home?
Why do town councils sound like just really shitty HOA's?
If you find a gun, and return it to the police, why would you be arrested?
I just don't fucking get it. It sounds horrible from a personal freedoms perspective.
funkmasterb said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/nottinghamshire/8578631.stm
and this?
Thanks for the replies. I still maintain my view and worry about how abusive and all encompasing the gov't seems to be there.
I forget which one it is, but Nottingham has either really horrible knife or gun crime. What they're doing makes sense: It's a Saturday night, allot of people are drinking and going out and something is bound to happen. I know what you mean, but even though this is probably Police PR it's still an efficient short term solution.funkmasterb said:
funkmasterb said:
Sir Fragula said:Fuck Britain, I'm English.
I'm sure that'd make a good bumper sticker, if I were a chav.
Shanadeus said:If it wasn't for the LibDems wanting to lower the voting age to 16(!?) they'd be the ideal party for me.
Though that might have changed or been some misinformation.
And you have maybe 5 more years of neurological development before you can be recognized as an mature adult.frankie_baby said:that sounds to me like really sensible policy, i mean if you can pay tax at 16 its only fair to be able to vote
Chinner said:this?
![]()
Funky Papa said:I honestly don't get it. Years ago (we are talking before-euro times) Spain made a lot of money thanks to the then low price of the peseta. Britons, Frenchs and Germans came here to raid the shops as soon as they got vacations.
What is this nonsense?J Tourettes said:there's no such nationality as English.
Yeah, that I get. What I can't understand is why a weak currency is bad for shops, given that most of them don't purchase their goods abroad (I thought we were talking about smaller commerces)LittleLordJimmy said:Yeah, it's good for that and for helping out a trade deficit. However, if your relying on imports they're going to be more expensive, which results in inflation or lower standard of living.
If expensive imports lead to high inflation, interest rates need to be raised (not good during a recession) , but will strengthen the currency and so the cycle continues.
Sir Fragula said:What is this nonsense?
Chriswok said:I'll be voting for whichever one will be keeping the NHS around. I want to keep my job dammit :lol
I'm seriously worried that the BNP and similar right wing groups are going to get more votes from people fed up, and dirty charvs who think it'll be cool. Don't get me wrong, I think immigration is an issue, but theres other important things to take care of first.
1. Clean up Parliament.
2. Secure Jobs.
Hell, if I could, I'd vote to go back to a Monarchy. I'd happily be a Yeoman or something :lol
J Tourettes said:I think the immigration issue is massively misunderstood by the major parties. I don't think illegal immigration is what bothers some people but rather the legal migrants from the EU.
Chriswok said:We should adopt a stricter system like Australia/Canada where you need skill points based on job experience. I'm honestly not bothered about who lives in Britain as long as their have something to contribute - British people included.
I'd like to add:
3. Lazy tossers sitting at home with 3+ kids claiming benefits and not working (AKA 'The Jeremy Kyle' Generation).
to the list too. That's worse than illegal immigrants, at least the immigrants are doing shit work for cheap pay.
Sir Fragula said:Hey hey I love Scotland; but I love it enough to set it free.
And joke's on you - I don't have a car! In fact I don't know whose car that was that you would have keyed... or whether the tenses in that last sentence work.
J Tourettes said:That'd be against European law though so would be unworkable.
The crusade against illegal immigrants/immigrants from non-EU states has contributed to the shortage of doctors in the NHS. Many Indian citizens (traditionally trained from British medical textbooks) have been refused work/entry since labours tightening of their immigration policy.
DefectiveReject said:David Cameron - Arse
Gordon Brown -Tolerable
Nick Clegg - Who?
I don't see what any of them can do to change Britain. It's the people of Britain that need to change, to change Britain. I'll vote for anyone who decides to stop taxing me for having a company car.
English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh will be on the 2011 census. Sadly though they rejected calls to add Cornish - they'll have to use the "other" checkbox.Only British exists in the eyes of the law hence why no English option on tickbox forms or census papers.
Really?? Because in my experience EU migrants tend to have a far easier time in the public's eye.J Tourettes said:I think the immigration issue is massively misunderstood by the major parties. I don't think illegal immigration is what bothers some people but rather the legal migrants from the EU.
DefectiveReject said:fucking greedy government
Sir Fragula said:English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh will be on the 2011 census. Sadly though they rejected calls to add Cornish - they'll have to use the "other" checkbox.
Really?? Because in my experience EU migrants tend to have a far easier time in the public's eye.
The immigration issue is partly concern with overcrowding and wage deflation, but mostly concern over the cultural impact. Polish people and others from the eastern states integrate well and integrate fast. Yes you might guess that the short haired red-head girl walking down the street is a migrant but you can bet your last penny that the stereotypical angry old pensioner wouldn't bat an eyelid at her in comparison to the more visible - i.e. coloured - immigrants who probably are more likely to be illegal.
Yes I will. The NHS isn't £1000 a month expensive.Subliminal said:You wont complain about a greedy government when you use the NHS.
Screw that. I very rarely make direct use of the NHS, but even if I paid loads of taxes, I'd be all for it. I'm 22, and I've been for 2 accidents, and a bit of medicine for some weird skin thing I got when I was a kid. Used to go to the dentist, but not anymore.DefectiveReject said:Yes I will. The NHS isn't £1000 a month expensive.
For me the NHS would become private and you'd pay for what you use.
Why should I pay over the odds. I'm not fat, nor an alcoholic nor a smoker.Yet those that are those are likely on benefits anyhow.
I mean 34" trousers are £30, and 54" trousers are £30. How mad is that?!?
I'd introduce a fat tax. That's how you get everyone healthy. Make em pay for being fat.
DefectiveReject said:Yes I will. The NHS isn't £1000 a month expensive.
For me the NHS would become private and you'd pay for what you use.
Parl said:Screw that. I very rarely make direct use of the NHS, but even if I paid loads of taxes, I'd be all for it. I'm 22, and I've been for 2 accidents, and a bit of medicine for some weird skin thing I got when I was a kid. Used to go to the dentist, but not anymore.
The NHS rules, despite it needing to be more efficient and effective.
McBacon said:Did you know that on the London Underground, there is one fatal accident for every 300 million journeys. They are mostly suicides and as such, some stations have deep pits underneath the tracks, which are officially called "anti-suicide pits".
![]()
Yup, and the people you need to feel sorry for are the drivers, both underground and overground...McBacon said:Did you know that on the London Underground, there is one fatal accident for every 300 million journeys. They are mostly suicides and as such, some stations have deep pits underneath the tracks, which are officially called "anti-suicide pits".
![]()
funkmasterb said:Tell me I'm not the only person who sees a steady erosion of freedoms?
Shanadeus said:I'd be up for increasing the age of voting if anything, to maybe 21.
Because rather Labour than the fucking Toffs? And no matter how bad its been at times lately, it's still better than the last time the Toffs were in?jas0nuk said:Semi-partisan discussion of the latest polls and issues in the news affecting the polls:
www.politicalbetting.com
I intend voting Conservative at the upcoming election and will be glad to debate/explain why to those who question me. I would also like people who intend to vote Labour to explain why, after 13 years of a government that has overtaxed and overspent with little to show for it and in some cases a worsening of the state of the country, they still want to give them another chance.