The rule changed a while ago mang. "Intent" has nothing to do with it. Now, there needs to be a "deliberate" motion of the hand/arm that results in a handball - that includes deliberately making yourself "bigger" to cause a handball. Intent has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Also, the level of deliberateness has nothing to do with whether there is a yellow or red card. A yellow card is given if the handball was a tactical foul or if it constituted "un-sportmanship conduct." A red is given if it "denies a clear goal scoring opportunity."
Make sure you know the rules next time before you are condescending.
Edit: I didn't see the handball here, so you may be right that it was not deliberate (and you are indeed right if he was running away and the ball hit his arm), but I'm just correcting your characterization of the rule.
Oh please, deliberate and intent mean the same in this case.
Wasn't Shea offsides on that goal?
No, it doesn't. I'm a referee and they spend hours telling us it doesn't mean the same thing every year.
Intentional = mental state
Deliberate = a voluntary movement
I'm also a lawyer and in criminal and tort law there is a clear distinction between intent and a voluntary act. So you are just wrong that they are the same.
He was behind the ball.
Wasn't Shea offsides on that goal?
If a ball is passed backwards, offside doesn't come into play.Ah. Didn't know the ball counted as a defender.
No, it doesn't. I'm a referee and they spend hours telling us it doesn't mean the same thing every year.
Intentional = mental state
Deliberate = a voluntary movement
I'm also a lawyer and in criminal and tort law there is a clear distinction between intent and a voluntary act. So you are just wrong that they are the same.
Tort law? Good lord, how do you deal?
If a ball is passed backwards, offside doesn't come into play.
If a ball is passed backwards, offside doesn't come into play.