Eh? Did you already preorder the physical version?
I'm getting both the physical and digital versions of the remaster, because the physical one has some excellent preorder bonuses.
No, it's obviously her.Are people not realizing that this is a new character and not Selvaria in the trailer?
The next step is movement around the battlefield and long-range attacks. You can take cover behind objects and use R1 to fire at enemies from a distance. L1 and Square let you use your sub-weapon. Hitting targets during this phase will put you in a better position when you get in close.
The third stage to combat is close-range fighting. The four face buttons are each assigned to different attacks and magic. Enemy and party reactions will change based on how you approach battle/whether you get in long-range attacks, etc.
Additionally, the Yasunori Mitsuda soundtrack is being performed by a full orchestra, and the transition between field and combat tracks will be seamless.
I mean, they could have pretty much just named the character Selvaria again and had her be a character that appears in every Valkyria continuity, like Cid in Final Fantasy or The Fallen in Transformers.No, it's obviously her.
=P
Can't think of a single one.
Edit: Oh wait, they dared to design a big breasted character, preposterous! Grab the pitchforks!
![]()
It's called variety. Might want to consider embracing it.
Game might be good. I just don't like the character designs. Seems to be a continuation of the route Valkyria Chronicles 2 started. I couldn't stand the characters in that game.
I guess I just don't like modern anime character designs in general anymore.
So we've gotten to the point where the topics have to be constantly sidetracked because of people's personal distaste of modern anime character designs, even though Valkyria has basically always been as anime/mu as it gets.
That's fine if you have that opinion, but it really has nothing to do with this game itself, so its really off topic. My advice is to stay away from games that have any modern anime art style designed games by default.
Leave it to those of us who actually want to discuss the game
What else do we have to discuss (I assumed the other thread was about the argument over the boobs specifically)? All we have is a trailer with no gameplay. All it shows us for the time being are the characters. I'm just reacting to what's in the trailer.
And I also think what we've seen in that trailer shows a stark contrast compared even to the original Valkyria Chronicles. A shift is definitely apparent in the way SEGA has tried to market and sell the games following the original, from the switch to the school setting with younger characters, to the switch in platforms for VC 2 and 3. This trailer just looks like more of that (but with a return to home consoles).
What else do we have to discuss (I assumed the other thread was about the argument over the boobs specifically)? All we have is a trailer with no gameplay. All it shows us for the time being are the characters. I'm just reacting to what's in the trailer.
And I also think what we've seen in that trailer shows a stark contrast compared even to the original Valkyria Chronicles.
Fire Emblem too, right? And he's not an artist really, but even Anno has been involved with porn.![]()
Criticizing such blatant made-for-male-gazes character design has nothing to do with "reducing" said character to be just that or "boob-shaming". She might be a good character but that doesn't mean her character design isn't bad or a perfect example of the rampant objectification of women that is all too common in video games & entertainment industry altogether. If you don't understand how that character design is purely that way visually for titillation purposes, then you certainly shouldn't participate in this discussion as if others are demonizing big breasted women. Stop acting as if these developers are trying to make stand of how big breasted are treated poorly, they aren't. There's a single reason why she has big breasts and that's because they know bewbiezzz sell for a certain audience.
And of course big-breasted women can be done well. Trails of Cold Steel has quite a few such characters who aren't generally objectified or shown from angles where their breasts are put front & center.
It just damages the tone of the game. Any good writing is undermined by the constant reminder that you shouldn't be taking the charavters seriously.
With that said, the restraint displayed in the design of the world and characters in VC seems wholly absent here and I'm keeping my expectations low.
Why is "restraint" something that matters in a fantasy video game? They've already said that this is a more overtly magical world than the original game.
Also even the original VC had pretty much thrown "restraint" out the window by the the end of the game
So we've gotten to the point where the topics have to be constantly sidetracked because of people's personal distaste of modern anime character designs, even though Valkyria has basically always been as anime/mu as it gets.
That's fine if you have that opinion, but it really has nothing to do with this game itself, so its really off topic. My advice is to stay away from games that have any modern anime art style designed games by default.
Leave it to those of us who actually want to discuss the game
I'm not sure if the thread is poking fun or trying to be funny, but I don't think it does a good job at either.
Soriku complained that discussing the breasts shown in the trailer is not actually discussing the trailer, so the mods split the topic into this one and the breasts one.
How is a game visual style off-topic? What if I disliked the music in the trailer? "What you actually dislike is vocal songs and that has nothing to do with the game itself"?
I understand the annoyance of having the flow of a conversation steered into something you don't care about by people with different tastes than you, to paint it as actually irrelevant comes off as really arrogant.
Why is "restraint" something that matters in a fantasy video game? They've already said that this is a more overtly magical world than the original game.
Why is "restraint" something that matters in a fantasy video game? They've already said that this is a more overtly magical world than the original game.
I'm sorry if i came off that way, its not my intention at all.
it just feels like every time a topic about this game comes up, its always about how "ew the art style sucks cause its SO ANIME" or "lol boobs, how disgusting".
Like..i understand we have a small amount of things to talk about based on what we've seen, but what about the scenario, or the enviorments, or what the battle system might be like? Soriku also got tapped for this, it just feels like people are so insistent on diverting the topic away from those of us who want to really talk or speculate about what the game will be like substantively.
Those boobs are outrageous...I loved the ps3 game, not sure how I feel about the more fantasy tonal shift...looks entirely too "anime."
Exercising restraint can just be a desirable aesthetic choice. Maybe one of the things that appealed to some people (yeah I basically just mean me) about the original game was how it incorporated its fantasy elements in what was otherwise a pretty down-to-earth military drama.
Because it makes the world consistent
Those boobs are outrageous...I loved the ps3 game, not sure how I feel about the more fantasy tonal shift...looks entirely too "anime."
I'm glad there's a topic about the preview that's not just boobsgate, because while I do have opinions on the subject, it just feels like a conversation that never goes anywhere on GAF. But besides that, there's just not a whole lot to discuss. We don't know how the game really plays, besides that magazine preview that I can't even find in the thread anymore (need to look closer). A couple of music making-of videos and a trailer that's mostly cutscene footage we've already seen is fun to watch, I guess, but it's not the game. We still don't know very much about the game. We don't even know what the story is or who the characters are; we literally only know about what they look like (unless I missed another magazine preview). In lieu of that, I'm not that surprised that people are nitpicking the tiny details because we have so little else to say besides "yup that music is nice."
man wouldn't it be nice if people stopped using "anime" as a catch-all descriptor for things they don't like?
I mean, how much more anime could Valkyria Chronicles possibly get? IT EVEN IS AN ANIME!
This is no more "anime" then the series has ever been.
Yeah, loved that down to earth military drama, where superpowered ladies fired laser beams across battlefields.
Also, "down to earth" is not in any way superior to "highly fantastic" unless you feel that the latter is somehow a lesser way to structure a story.
Which would be a very silly position to hold, right?
I guess so...i guess the only thing to really do is wait for more information or the demo that comes with VCR, but i'm really hoping that by that point, the derision over boobsgate and animegate passes in favor of more things game related.
Looking at the current japanese gaming landscape, that dosn't look like a terrible thing. Moreso if that means Ayami Kojima is getting all those jobs.
Compare it to any Tales game, where a bunch of teenagers and small children romp around a lush fantasy land wearing ridiculous costumes and using special magic powers to obliterate all kinds of massive monsters and put a stop to multiple world-ending threats
Also: I never said "down to earth" was objectively superior to "highly fantastic" because the concept of one being superior to other makes no sense unless you're talking about personal preference. I wouldn't tell you that you were wrong for liking more fantastical games; why are you here trying to tell me that liking the original VC because it felt more realistic is wrong? It's literally a subjective opinion with no logic required to back it up.
This game could be good but if I enjoy it, it's probably not because of anything I liked Valkyria Chronicles for. That MC with his giant sword rushing in middle of a gun fight like some shonen super power anime doesn't exactly hit the same notes as Welkin, his squad and strategic tank/troop battles that had a unique balance between fantasy and WWII. I get it this isn't SRPG but I'm not sure why it even exists as a Valkyria game. Worst kind of spin off. They could make an action RPG Valkyria game or something else, but when someone makes an spin off in another genre, at least it tries to keep the subject somewhat relevant so that it appeals to the fans. Not like this.
Maybe when they finally release proper footage I change my tone, but if it plays like that Shining game for PS3, I probably won't care about it. So far everything that has happened since the original game, seems like a series of horrible horrible decisions. I hope I'm wrong about this game.
I didn't talk about female designs here, hopefully this post counts as "Soriku approved".
Exercising restraint can just be a desirable aesthetic choice. Maybe one of the things that appealed to some people (yeah I basically just mean me) about the original game was how it incorporated its fantasy elements in what was otherwise a pretty down-to-earth military drama.
And my subjective opinion is that I disagree with your subjective opinions
Thats how opinions work.
Thats how discussion works.
But mostly it comes down to people judging a game based on virtually no information, and making sweeping conclusions about it and its characters based on nothing but THE SIZE OF THEIR TITS.
Yes, Valkyria Chronicles does seem to be more "realistic" than this game, but thats also meaningless because this is explicitly not the same setting. Thats the entire point.
Its like complaining that two different Final Fantasy games feel completely different in their settings. Correct, but not a particularly useful or interesting observation.
For all you know you'll end up loving this setting, but the first thing you jump at is "its different and I don't like it"
Come on, thats just lazy.
And my subjective opinion is that I disagree with your subjective opinions
Thats how opinions work.
Thats how discussion works.
But mostly it comes down to people judging a game based on virtually no information, and making sweeping conclusions about it and its characters based on nothing but THE SIZE OF THEIR TITS.
Yes, Valkyria Chronicles does seem to be more "realistic" than this game, but thats also meaningless because this is explicitly not the same setting. Thats the entire point.
Its like complaining that two different Final Fantasy games feel completely different in their settings. Correct, but not a particularly useful or interesting observation.
For all you know you'll end up loving this setting, but the first thing you jump at is "its different and I don't like it"
Come on, thats just lazy.