Wat?
I was calling him my rival in the Season 7 thread because of Archer game. Werewolf's always more fun with heated rivalries!
What about satanic saint zubs? He's pushed the no lynch angle since his first post. I'm worried you suddenly picked the guy who just said he wouldn't be around when what you voted him for others did earlier.
Hmm. Still a bizarre statement. Not to mention you died on day 2 of Archer, your rivalry is like at Chun-Li - MBison level.
Of course none of any of that really has anything to do with the game at hand.
Well, Time what is your verdict? Will you lynch me for the shenanigans? Is your vote on Fat still justified? What else caught your attention?
Despite posting the most I have no read on Fat4all, I can't grasp him yet.
Well the real value of Day 1 lynch is getting people to be active enough to generate a vote pattern. I don't know if we'll ever be successful enough to hit scum.
Yeah, I would. It's easy to lead a vote on someone Day 1 and then claim to be the only ones trying to hunt scum when the target flips town. People want an easy scapegoat the first day.
I don't get it.
Get in here, what's your take on Christina?
Going to give the thread a good look at now and get some thoughts down (and hopefully a vote) before I go to bed.
Is there a chance Satanic is scum, and his claim was a tactic? I've been thinking about it for a while, and while it seems super risky, if it worked it could probably get them a far in if they fake it hard enough and get aid from scum buddies.
---
Just saw that you're heading out soon, so I'll post this now just in case you get to see my response before you go.
Feel like this is the first game in long while I've played, with no D1 gambits.
This feels like you picked 3 names out of a hat. Could've just as easily been Me, Trigger, Zubz, or Dusk, Infinit, Time; or any number of other combinations.
Define catching heat? There were plenty of reactions and he has two votes on him.Hasn't contributed much since then, but also didn't catch any heat for his actions
I am beginning to suspect it and the post I quoted are fluff claims. I am hoping so at least.
Sorry, can you clarify what you mean here? Tied to Blarg in what way?AbsolutBro feels kind of tied to Blarg to me
Stealing my Star Wars tactics huh? Funny, I was scum then...The result? This monstrosity. (Apologies for the handwriting, now you know how my students feel)
>image snipped<
So it's 1AM here as I type this so I apologise in advance.
So I decided to look at the connections between players in a few ways. 1: When a player gives an opinion on someone else or asks for the opinion of someone else to the group at large. 2: An ongoing conversation that was held between players. The result? This monstrosity. (Apologies for the handwriting, now you know how my students feel)
I've just used this to help me see which players are being homed in on and which players are doing the hunting. Blarg has a ton of arrows on him but that's mainly due to squidy asking about voting on him right away. Only other info I feel this really gives is seeing which players can be a bit obsessive (Squidy keeps on at Blarg, early on and later focuses on gorlak quite a bit, as does batsnacks) but I see nothing useful in this. It's probably just play style, these guys have got questions and want answers.
The convos are a bit more interesting to me as (in my eyes) it shows who is having a conversation and who is just throwing thoughts out (guilty as charged). Gorlak is the hub of conversation in my eyes right now as he has a lot of red coming of him. Someone who is involved in this many convos this early on is a keeper to me. I'm not saying he is generating them but if he is town he is keeping info flowing and if he is scum then he has a greater chance of getting himself tangled up.
I don't like that Satanic Stan hasn't offered any explanation to his maybe maybe not roll claim posts form earlier even though a number of us have discussed it, it's a conversation thread that has been left dangling. Don't expect a resolution but would like to hear some sort of explanation from him.
So going off of day 1 so far, I am sticking with my vote on squidyj. I will say however that I am a bit skeptical AB as well. . .
I will be posting today, but at 4 I will be leaving for chicago and won't be back until sunday night/ monday morning. I'll try to pop in if i can guys.
Golark you're right. S. Saint does have quite a few votes on him right now.
But at the time of his claim, no one really questioned or called him out on it. And the subject was dropped as soon as Blarg started releasing his preview chapters.
The two votes on him now, don't feel like genuine pressure votes. They look like just safe votes placed to avoid drawing suspicion.
There's nothing particularly scummy about AbsolutBro's posting to me. Honestly, who's to say that time and squidy aren't scum just trying to appear town by aggressively cornering some innocent townie? Just playing Devil's Advocate here.
Trigger
He's been really good at being here to answer questions from the new players (what claiming town means vs role claims, what scum means, suggesting our pm's are a good place to find info). He's also been able to give us a decent look into possibly scum strategies in posts 263 and 305. He's been pretty silent since yesterday, but I don't think that's anything to worry about yet.
who's your #1 preference gorlak