So did Brazil. And Argentina.Such a shame. Venezuela had the opportunity to be the Norway of Latin America.
So did Brazil. And Argentina.
Older i get, the more i think corruption will always be the dominant force in South America.
I don't know about that. Latin America has huge wealth disparities and infrastructure problems.
Poverty is really rampant as well. I speaks as someone who's traveled in the region. There are many villages made of sheet metal homes. And forget about the drug trade and its huge influence as well.
Lo and behold, it seems that Chavez had the great fucking idea of distributing fire arms among the most impoverished districts of Venezuela so they could "defend the revolution" and "protect from the burgeois". The results were instead a brutal rise in crime and gun deaths, which deeply affects the everyday life of the ordinary Venezuelan far more than any kind of economic idiocy. Shit's infuriating and unforgivable, as it has resulted in countless deaths of innocents for no fucking reason other than political posturing. If this is not a sign of madness and evil, nothing is.
Another chunk was given away in the form of cheap oil to Cuba and to other Caribbean countries, assuring Chávez loyal allies.
I think the biggest factor of Caracas being the most dangerous city in the world is that the police and local army run the biggest crimes.
Deep corruption has to be solved before any of that can be fixed. As long as civic faith is zilch there's no way to prevent government services and projects from devolving into cronyism and tribalism which further entrench the corruption.I don't know about that. Latin America has huge wealth disparities and infrastructure problems.
Poverty is really rampant as well. I speaks as someone who's traveled in the region. There are many villages made of sheet metal homes. And forget about the drug trade and its huge influence as well.
Last weekend I was talking with a Venezuelan expat, and I asked him about one very glaring omission in these type of articles: About the relationship between the ascent of Chaves and the deterioration of public safety and steep growth of crime. I always wondered why these two things happened in tandem and if there was any connexion between them.
Lo and behold, it seems that Chavez had the great fucking idea of distributing fire arms among the most impoverished districts of Venezuela so they could "defend the revolution" and "protect from the burgeois". The results were instead a brutal rise in crime and gun deaths, which deeply affects the everyday life of the ordinary Venezuelan far more than any kind of economic idiocy. Shit's infuriating and unforgivable, as it has resulted in countless deaths of innocents for no fucking reason other than political posturing. If this is not a sign of madness and evil, nothing is.
I don't know about that. Latin America has huge wealth disparities and infrastructure problems.
Poverty is really rampant as well. I speaks as someone who's traveled in the region. There are many villages made of sheet metal homes. And forget about the drug trade and its huge influence as well.
Where are you getting that Chavez distributed guns to the poor? Gun ownership was made illegal under Chavez. When did he just hand out guns? Do you have a source for him doings this?Last weekend I was talking with a Venezuelan expat, and I asked him about one very glaring omission in these type of articles: About the relationship between the ascent of Chaves and the deterioration of public safety and steep growth of crime. I always wondered why these two things happened in tandem and if there was any connexion between them.
Lo and behold, it seems that Chavez had the great fucking idea of distributing fire arms among the most impoverished districts of Venezuela so they could "defend the revolution" and "protect from the burgeois". The results were instead a brutal rise in crime and gun deaths, which deeply affects the everyday life of the ordinary Venezuelan far more than any kind of economic idiocy. Shit's infuriating and unforgivable, as it has resulted in countless deaths of innocents for no fucking reason other than political posturing. If this is not a sign of madness and evil, nothing is.
Protests have exploded across Venezuela in recent days as citizens gather to demonstrate against the government's heavy-handed police tactics, its crackdown on political dissent, and the economic woes that have led to inflation and shortages of basic goods. These photos show just how large those protests have become and the scale of the government crackdown they provoked, which this week led to the death of a 14-year-old boy during an anti-government rally.
From that link:
Do these protests have any chance of overthrowing the government or are they going to get brutally repressed?
Where are you getting that Chavez distributed guns to the poor? Gun ownership was made illegal under Chavez. When did he just hand out guns? Do you have a source for him doings this?
Are you for real? I can't tell anymore gaf has been weird lately
Someone has to defend democracy with EV gone and Zuhzuhzuhzombie!!! broken.No, he's joking. He does this in a number of threads but he's not very good at it.
Tragic to see U.S. CIA coups being treated as actual revolutions of the people. I wonder how many of those are actual Venezuelans. I doubt it's more than a few, and likely all upper middle class.
Now that these counterrevolutionary traitors are out in the open the government needs to quickly stamp them out and restore the road to socialism. By seizing their hoarded goods and money they can redistribute it to the people and end the shortages.
Where are you getting that Chavez distributed guns to the poor? Gun ownership was made illegal under Chavez. When did he just hand out guns? Do you have a source for him doings this?
Not even close to what happened here in Colombia. Even if guerrillas happened here since the 40s and 50s the mentality dates back all the way to the beginning of the century and the perpetual hatred the two party system left us. When both FARC and ELN appeared they did so against a government that told them to kill each other for the good of all, with strong comunist ties.Pro Maduro manifestations are also huge.
People are 50-50 on the guy so a civil war may be the only outcome. Pretty similar to what happened in Colombia 70 years ago...
Hope you are not violent fuckers as we were
By he way I'm Venezuelan and I'm living in this shit hole if you have any questions.
I made a thread a few days ago about making only $46 a months.
I've observed that some people instinctively mistrust government, while others reflexively defend them. Some people are big proponents of corporations, while others instinctively distrust them.
I believe a lot of political differences come from these basic gut feelings: people who instinctively distrust government will frequently lean conservative, because they will automatically assume the worst whenever the government is involved. Someone who distrusts corporations reflexively will tend to lean liberal, and will not trust GMOs, for instance, or pharmaceuticals, because they happen to be made by corporations.
That isn't to say there aren't reasonable people on both sides; there are. I'm just pointing out that a lot of differences ultimately spring out of these very rudimentary premises. If you start with the premise that governments help people and can be trusted, you'll arrive at very different conclusions than someone who starts with the premise that governments are inherently corrupt and inept.
Democracy? Lol yeah lets vote to fix this...Someone has to defend democracy with EV gone and Zuhzuhzuhzombie!!! broken.
I don't think many people have these fundamentals views about government and the state (beside benji) but rather institutions. Conservatives distrust regulatory agencies but have a fundamental good view of the military. Socialists trust academia but distrust corporations.
I think its reductive to even attempt to see this in a kind of black and white in regards to government per se. Its much more likely people trust the institutions that agree with their fundamental presumptions. This change change as the composition of such institutions changes (see the US south go from the biggest lovers of big government to hating it when it became "liberalized" and integrated, or this leaving of European socialists parties when they gave up much of their socialist rhetoric and ideas in the 80s and 90s.)
From that link:
Do these protests have any chance of overthrowing the government or are they going to get brutally repressed?
But I think it's difficult to have strong institutions without wealth. If the government can't pay salaries and everyone is being paid a pittance then that encourages corruption. Oil rich governments have billions at their disposal with which to strengthen government institutions. It just seems some deficiency of logic at a societal level that holds these countries back.
They have publicly sponsored a coup (we will march until he is out of the chair, were the words used)
These protestors were sent by the US government to destabilize the people's government.
One thing that has always fascinated me is how these countries come into massive oil wealth but still end up dysfunctional. Especially Venezuela because you'd think they could sustain reducing poverty and economic growth with an equitable social democracy policy similar to the Nordic states.
They're paid by the Rothchilds and IMF through the World Bank as part of a mission to crush the people under the boot of the expat bourgeoisie, here let me get my pamphlets.Whoever is in charge of sending these protestors around the world needs a raise. What a fantastic job they do. You know your work is appreciated when other people mention it.