What I'm hearing in this thread is mostly one-sided. The 'screw the rich, support the poor' view (or the other way around) doesn't always work. In this case, it shouldn't be hard to admit that if you see a company you care about get screwed, you'll get pissed. Most people in the lower class have lots of companies they care about. How in the hell does that equate to ignoring the needy? And who says poor people are the only ones in need? Money doesn't take care of everything (abuse, alcoholism/drugs, mental problems, etc.). The extreme side of that is if we cared about the needy enough, we'd never play games and Nintendo wouldn't exist. It's just a stupid argument. It's like saying, 'get off the internet and go help the needy.' That's stupid because the internet does serve the purpose of educating, perhaps finding or reaching those in need. It's obvious to me that in this argument, the 'screw Nintendo' crew is either confused, or they hate Nintendo and/or its fans.