Lumination
'enry 'ollins
I haven't followed all of today, but why are you so sure on that? I thought that was still up in the air?Yeah they are going to vote for that but no way it passes.
I haven't followed all of today, but why are you so sure on that? I thought that was still up in the air?Yeah they are going to vote for that but no way it passes.
I can understand not knowing how this stuff works if you're not an American, but it's a pretty stunning indictment of civics if you can't follow what's going on, at a basic level, and you're a citizen of this nation.
So which of these dozens of things they're apparently voting on this week should we mostly be concerned about? Is there one that only needs 50 votes that may pass?
Thanks both. I've really been doing my best at trying to follow this whole thing since the start, but I was at a loss on all that's happening with this right now.
It would be pretty great if this got kicked back to square 1 in the House. Would give much needed temporarily relief from people worrying about getting kicked off their healthcare. v___v
What's the immediate or near term ramifications for that?Skinny Repeal basically. I can't wait to see them try to sell that as a big win. It's going to be something.
Trump campaigned on repealing "Obamacare" and replacing it with something better. That's clearly not happening so I hope when the Republicans decimate the ACA instead causing it to collapse their base holds them responsible.
Oh who am I kidding, they're going to blame Obama aren't they?
Maybe not, but I couldn't see Paul and Lee voting for it.
What the immediate or near term ramifications for that?
Is it wrong to seriously wonder about brain damage?
All the way to the end, yes.
Is it wrong to seriously wonder about brain damage?
I want to feel sorry for them because while we're all going to get hurt by this once premiums skyrocket they're going to be hit the worst but it's so hard to feel bad for people that vote against their own interests.All the way to the end, yes.
Fuck off.
I TEACH this stuff for a living as an AP United States Government and Politics teacher, and it isn't simple and people have every right to be confused.
Can we say mean things about McCain now, or do his well wishers want to wait for the results of the "slim repeal" vote as well?
So doing it by the backdoor with enough distance to hoodwink the dumbasses.Health care companies pulling out of the ACA, and single markets, essentially killing it that much faster.
Maybe instead of telling people to fuck off, you can explain why anyone has an excuse to come in here with comments like "wait, I thought they already voted earlier and it passed" when the OP of that thread itself explained exactly what was going on. Not just the OP either, plenty of people throughout the thread explained what a motion to proceed was. There's no excuse for refusing to read a couple lines of text.
I mean, earlier in the day, Senators were confused on what's going on. This is not a clear process, things are being done at a rapid pace, and not a lot of information is being shared about it.
It is perfectly normal to be confused given those circumstances. And to be honest, the OP doesn't exactly clearly lay out the process. More than a "couple sentences" are needed here.
Parliamentary procedure is complicated and arcane. Especially at the government level. If you don't study it or work within it on a regular basis, shit is confusing.
No offense but where did this myth of McCain being some maverick come from? Is it just a lie or from some obscure thing he did in the late 80s/early 90s?
McCain: I WISH PEOPLE WOULD STOP SAYING SARAH PALIN WAS THE NADIR OF MY LEGACY
*monkey's paw twitches*
Is it wrong to seriously wonder about brain damage?
This was one of the first images you see in the previous thread.
No offense but where did this myth of McCain being some maverick come from? Is it just a lie or from some obscure thing he did in the late 80s/early 90s?
I haven't followed all of today, but why are you so sure on that? I thought that was still up in the air?
So what? It still isn't that clear. Step 2 says 20 hours of debate. MTP already happened. Yet another vote just occurred without that box being checked.
Was it an amendment? Which amendment? Was it procedural (as stated on the very short CSPAN description)? Was it something else?
What is next specifically? What amendment is being debated? What does it mean? How long will this process go on overall? What needs 50 votes? What needs 60? What are the points of order? Etc, etc.
I just wanted to apologize to GAF for defending McCain in the "McCain's got a tumor" thread. I'm completely shocked that he voted for this, and there's really no defending him at this point. He has no political future, voting on a bill that had really no chance of passing, after just having a clot removed THANKS TO HEALTHCARE, and he voted to shit on the people. Just terrible.
...how 'bout that Lindsey Graham though! Gotta find a new anti-hero for the media.
Not only all of that, he literally said today he would not vote for BCRA as is. Which he did.
Maybe instead of telling people to fuck off, you can explain why anyone has an excuse to come in here with comments like "wait, I thought they already voted earlier and it passed" when the OP of that thread itself explained exactly what was going on. Not just the OP either, plenty of people throughout the thread explained what a motion to proceed was. There's no excuse for refusing to read a couple lines of text.
I think we need a running list of votes to cut down on confusion.
I think we need a running list of votes to cut down on confusion.
What does any of that have to do with a comment that says "wait, I thought they already voted and it passed?"
Someone said The Times has that going.
I know you get off on being extremely obtuse, but the poster was clearly confused over the general process. So instead of berating them, it would be more helpful to have more than a Twitter image and a sentence or two in the OP clearly laying out the overall process.
That image doesn't clearly explain everything. And it's arguably wrong given another vote happened on an amendment yet the debate part is not checked. Should be more clear saying debate is ongoing and during that, amendments can happen.
So I guess I'm confused. The only option left now is repeal and not replace?
No offense but where did this myth of McCain being some maverick come from? Is it just a lie or from some obscure thing he did in the late 80s/early 90s?
The same place that Portman, Capito, etc being "moderates" came from.
The media refuses to recognize all Republicans as shit heads so they crown the asses of anyone that dares to say anything remotely against the party line at all.
No offense but where did this myth of McCain being some maverick come from? Is it just a lie or from some obscure thing he did in the late 80s/early 90s?
It's sad that the McCain of finance reform and removing money from politics in the late 90s became such a fucking party parasite.
What ever happened to his integrity?
It's 15 million over 10 years. The other plans were up to 25 million in only 4 years, so it's something, I guess.For a 50 vote, pretty much their only option is the "skinny repeal", which kills the individual mandate. Keeping the ACA while gutting the mandate will send the ACA, and the entire insurance industry, into a death spiral. "Only" 15 million people would lose insurance though, which I guess is an improvement as long as you forget that 1/6 of the economy would be destroyed, plunging us into a new recession.
Also, they call McCain a maverick because until 2008 he was. After he failed in the 2008 election it felt like his balls were cut off.