IMDB isn't critics, its users, and LoK is only .6 behind ATLA (my point being that the vitriol thrown at Korra is a drastic opposite of the vast majority of people's views on the shows).
Ah, I see. I hope you'll forgive my confusion; I was still thinking of your comment on the previous page regarding the aggregate critical response.
You don't need gigantic sample sizes to get an idea of general consensus. That's why election polls typically only use ~1000 respondents. Whereas LoK and ATLA have millions of fans. So no, the sample size is massive.
The IMDb and TV.com ratings clearly indicate that there are plenty of people who liked
Korra out there, but let's not act like IMDb users are a representative or random sample of the entire TV-watching public. They aren't.
I have seen countless times where someone watches ATLA and immediately some troll/hater jumps in and goes "Good now never watch Korra" and hate-train rolls in.
Typically once it gets boiled down you end up with A) people calling Korra a Mary Sue (just happened here) when Aang was a Gary Stu himself and B) homophobia
I can sympathize with not being a fan of all the negativity, but I don't think any of the posts in here were trollish in the sense of being made insincerely for the purpose of getting people riled up. I completely agree with you that Korra is not a Mary Sue and I think it's unfortunate how that term gets thrown around so much at seemingly any disliked characters, and there are sometimes unfortunate implications with regards to gender politics lurking pretty close to the surface. But there have been plenty of people who have explained in reasonable detail
why they dislike
Korra, regardless of whether or not I agree with every criticism. I haven't noticed anyone in this thread criticizing the show for including a prominent same-sex relationship but I did skim part of it so maybe I missed something; my apologies if that's so.
Its dishonest and unfair to people who might be interested in watching Korra to act like there is a consensus that it sucks. You can be critical of things without trying to pass it off as if the show actually sucks, when it objectively is well-received.
I.E, I thought Jurassic World wasn't a good movie, but I'm not gonna go in a thread for someone watching JP1 and go "Never fucking watch Jurassic World its awful".
I firmly disagree that someone expressing their negative opinion of a show, even if it's a very strongly negative opinion, is in any way suggesting that there is a consensus that their view is correct. Regardless of whether a given post begins with the words "in my opinion", I think it's pretty obvious to everyone that we're all just sharing our opinion. The same holds true of professional critics, as I mentioned upthread.
EDIT:
Okay, let's not turn this thread into a study on the statistical enjoyment of TLA and Korra
Didn't see this post until after I made my latest; I'll bow out of this subthread if it's getting too pedantic or negative.