Pagusas
Elden Member
LOVED itdid you like the new blade runner movie?
LOVED itdid you like the new blade runner movie?
But this is ONLY once you are in the theater and it is on screen for like 2 seconds (it is the fastest title card I can remember seeing). I've not seen a single trailer or even mainstream article mentioning that this is just part of the story prior to it's release. WB is trying a little deceptive marketing which I wouldn't necessarily mind if A. part 2 was already filming/in post or B. Part 1 had an internally satisfying arc and conclusion (which it doesn't). Dune MUST have part 2 for it to work at all IMHO.It even very clearly says "PART I" in the title screen of the movie.
What metrics are you using for that statement?So far it’s flopping boxoffice-wise but maybe it’ll have legs.
The boxoffice to budget ratio metric.What metrics are you using for that statement?
On a budget of USD$165 million, it's sitting at USD$220 million so far. It's been out about four days, is available on HBO Max day-and-date, and has been released during a global pandemic when folks are only just getting used to the idea of going back to the cinema. And you're posting in a thread where the financiers of the film state they're "very very happy" with it's success so far. How is this "flopping" under any definition of the word?The boxoffice to budget ratio metric.
It's a wonder people don't think things through rationally.On a budget of USD$165 million, it's sitting at USD$220 million so far. It's been out about four days, is available on HBO Max day-and-date, and has been released during a global pandemic when folks are only just getting used to the idea of going back to the cinema. And you're posting in a thread where the financiers of the film state they're "very very happy" with it's success so far. How is this "flopping" under any definition of the word?
Visuals were 11/10, but that BZZZZZZZZZZ sounds every second got super annoying very fast.LOVED it
Not necessarily. Remember Battle Angel? That was like 1% of the story.Saw it. Nice experience. Of course there will be a 2 (right?).
Part 2 has already been greenlit I believeNot necessarily. Remember Battle Angel? That was like 1% of the story.
Expensive, niche sci-fi stuff actually does have to be supported or else it wont get made.
Watched the movie last night and was on black out mode till watching it. I enjoyed the movie and my brother did too(he doesn't typically care for this stuff). Cannot wait for part 2
Side note: my theater was mostly empty. There were like 4 other small groups there.
Not necessarily. Remember Battle Angel? That was like 1% of the story.
Expensive, niche sci-fi stuff actually does have to be supported or else it wont get made.
Well the end result is still massive disappointment. My brothers and I went to see Battle Angel multiple times just to try and help it do well (and we enjoyed seeing it). Bought it on blu-ray as well. One of the biggest wasted opportunities I can think of in modern film history. The story was barely even started, and was going to do nothing but improve.Battle Angel came out right when Disney was buying Fox and didn't have the pandemic handicap that Dune has the benefit of. WB has also greenlit sequels to HBO Max premieres that weren't as successful as Dune (Wonder Woman 1984 for example).
It’ll be a crime if Battle Angel doesn’t get a sequel.Well the end result is still massive disappointment. My brothers and I went to see Battle Angel multiple times just to try and help it do well (and we enjoyed seeing it). Bought it on blu-ray as well. One of the biggest wasted opportunities I can think of in modern film history. The story was barely even started, and was going to do nothing but improve.
I'm really curious to see how Avatar 2 ends up doing now in our post-Marvel, post-pandemic world.
If a sequel was going to happen it would have already. It’s dead. And that’s sad, because while flawed, it had so much potential to work fromIt’ll be a crime if Battle Angel doesn’t get a sequel.
This is what I've always thought. It was at a time when 3d was new and exciting again. After avatar the 3d craze never got that hot again. I remember watching mad max in 3d and being so pissed that there were like 2 scenes of 3d.Is Avatar 2 in 3D? I think that novelty (?) had a LOT to do with its success in 2009.
On a budget of USD$165 million, it's sitting at USD$220 million so far. It's been out about four days, is available on HBO Max day-and-date, and has been released during a global pandemic when folks are only just getting used to the idea of going back to the cinema. And you're posting in a thread where the financiers of the film state they're "very very happy" with it's success so far. How is this "flopping" under any definition of the word?
Being "very happy" is called saving face. Again, if Warner/HBO/AT&T were truly happy with HBO Max's performance they would continue their dual release strategy in 2022.
How many people watched Dune on day 1 on HBO Max, 1.9 million? How much does HBO Max cost, $15usd?
$15 x 1.9 million. That's worth about $28.5 million.
Not very much money at all. Then there are the logistics we can't see, how many of those 1.9 million actually finished the film? That's one metric they can't see with a theatrical release, how many people walked out mid movie. But they can see it with streaming.
I have no idea what metric they would be using to be "happy" with Dunes performance so far on HBO Max.
My first thought after watching it was "yea mainstream audiences are not gonna vide with it much" but I loved it and I know it's going to do poorly in America.my wife actually asked if we could leave about 3/4 of the way through it (we didn’t), then on the car ride home said she wished we had watched it at home so she could have stopped it, lol. So I see your point
My first thought after watching it was "yea mainstream audiences are not gonna vide with it much" but I loved it and I know it's going to do poorly in America.
Out for 4 days unless you count the 34 countries where it was released for longer than that. Global pandemic and yet there are other movies doing way better. And how many countries are still locked down. Also, HBO Max is available in the US in terms of significant contributor to the worldwide boxoffice. As far as I can see “very very happy” = PR speak.On a budget of USD$165 million, it's sitting at USD$220 million so far. It's been out about four days, is available on HBO Max day-and-date, and has been released during a global pandemic when folks are only just getting used to the idea of going back to the cinema. And you're posting in a thread where the financiers of the film state they're "very very happy" with it's success so far. How is this "flopping" under any definition of the word?
What made you think mainstream audiences would not like it?My first thought after watching it was "yea mainstream audiences are not gonna vide with it much" but I loved it and I know it's going to do poorly in America.
Out for 4 days unless you count the 34 countries where it was released for longer than that. Global pandemic and yet there are other movies doing way better. And how many countries are still locked down. Also, HBO Max is available in the US in terms of significant contributor to the worldwide boxoffice. As far as I can see “very very happy” = PR speak.
1. It's longWhat made you think mainstream audiences would not like it?
... what? Nothing you've said here contributes in any way to Dune "flopping". The closest you've got is "other movies are doing better". By this metric, every film that isn't Avatar is "flopping"? You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Is it setting the entire world on fire? No. Is it still doing pretty well, all things considered? Yeah.Out for 4 days unless you count the 34 countries where it was released for longer than that. Global pandemic and yet there are other movies doing way better. And how many countries are still locked down. Also, HBO Max is available in the US in terms of significant contributor to the worldwide boxoffice. As far as I can see “very very happy” = PR speak.
1. It's long
2. Hard Sci-fi from an old book
3. The visuals/art style is weird as hell (I personally love it though)
4. Story is incomplete and can be confusing at times to a new audience.
5. Not a whole lot of action
True, it could a side story 9 years later. I think it will get a sequel because everything gets a sequel these days.1.9 million "first weekend viewership" on HBO Max per Samba TV which places it at #6 on the service for 2020-2021. Falls behind Mortal Kombat (3.8 mill), Godzilla v King Kong (3.6 mill), The Suicide Squad (2.8 mill), WW 1984 (2.2 mill) and Space Jam (2.1 mill).
$225 million ww box office so far, not sure it'll have the legs for the $400 mill you'd like to see in traditional times. However, Mad Max Fury Road is getting a prequel made so.....why not Dune part 2?
You’re kidding? I told you that the metrics I am going by is Dune’s boxoffice revenue. That’s the only concrete metric we have.... what? Nothing you've said here contributes in any way to Dune "flopping". The closest you've got is "other movies are doing better". By this metric, every film that isn't Avatar is "flopping"? You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Is it setting the entire world on fire? No. Is it still doing pretty well, all things considered? Yeah.
It's a combination of all five, not just one bro. I asked everyone I knew in my personal life and they had no idea what Dune was or even the movie existed. Dune may be very influential to Sci-fi, but the larger public has no idea what it is. To compare LOTR to Dune seems pretty laughable from what book readers have told me.1. Should I be listing the number of long running popular movies? Because there are many.
2. I don’t know why you added from old book. But Star Wars, Avatar, Interstellar (all long movies as well). You could label the Lord of the Rings as hard fantasy from old book as well.
3. Not sure how. It looks like a big budget movie visuals to me.
4. Ah, like The Lord of the Rings or Star Wars?
5. That I can understand though we have seen that people don’t mind movies with not much action like Joker. That said, I haven’t seen the movie - it could have enough action scenes.
What? To quote myself:You’re kidding? I told you that the metrics I am going by is Dune’s boxoffice revenue. That’s the only concrete metric we have.
So:On a budget of USD$165 million, it's sitting at USD$220 million so far. It's been out about four days, is available on HBO Max day-and-date, and has been released during a global pandemic when folks are only just getting used to the idea of going back to the cinema. And you're posting in a thread where the financiers of the film state they're "very very happy" with it's success so far. How is this "flopping" under any definition of the word?
If you have nothing meaningful to add, I'm going to stop replying now.... what? Nothing you've said here contributes in any way to Dune "flopping". The closest you've got is "other movies are doing better". By this metric, every film that isn't Avatar is "flopping"? You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Is it setting the entire world on fire? No. Is it still doing pretty well, all things considered? Yeah.
If everybody is happy, then what's the hold up?
Get on that shit, Denis. It's gonna take you 2+ years to make it anyway.
In what world does a gross of $220M on a production budget of $165M mean that boxoffice-wise Dune is doing fine? I think that you think that the studio gets all the money from the gross.What? To quote myself:
So:
Based on box office, Dune is doing fine.
Based on critical reception, Dune is doing fine.
Based on fan reception, Dune is doing fine.
Based on streaming numbers, Dune is doing fine.
Based on word of mouth, Dune is doing fine.
Based on the financiers opinion, Dune is doing "very very" well.
Based on the distributor's comments, Dune is doing fine.
And after seven posts in this thread, literally nothing you've said mildly indicates anyone other than you believes Dune is "flopping". So, to quote myself again,:
If you have nothing meaningful to add, I'm going to stop replying now.
Star Wars would be a combination of all the above. The only thing I am not sure about is the action. You’re right - LotR cannot be compared because it was the first widely successful high fantasy movie whereas successful sci-fi movies have been a thing for decades.It's a combination of all five, not just one bro. I asked everyone I knew in my personal life and they had no idea what Dune was or even the movie existed. Dune may be very influential to Sci-fi, but the larger public has no idea what it is. To compare LOTR to Dune seems pretty laughable from what book readers have told me.
It's usually around a 60/40 split, so the studio is currently sitting on around $132m and change. It hasn't finished its run, it has terrific word of mouth - especially as a movie to be seen on the big screen - and it hasn't opened everywhere yet. And it's available on streaming day-and-date. So, as I said, is it setting the world on fire? No, but is it doing perfectly fine? Yeah.In what world does a gross of $220M on a production budget of $165M mean that boxoffice-wise Dune is doing fine? I think that you think that the studio gets all the money from the gross.
It’s 60/40 in the US, around 50/50 from international markets and 25/75 from China.It's usually around a 60/40 split, so the studio is currently sitting on around $132m and change. It hasn't finished its run, it has terrific word of mouth - especially as a movie to be seen on the big screen - and it hasn't opened everywhere yet. And it's available on streaming day-and-date. So, as I said, is it setting the world on fire? No, but is it doing perfectly fine? Yeah.