Pray to reason.
To be fair humans can't even grasp numbers larger than 10. We've achieved a lot via abstraction and written language, but to internalize huge concepts like specie variation, evolution, extinction is really tough. You can read about it, but you can't really "feel" it.It's insanity that people literally do not give a shit and outright deny this is happening. They've somehow whittled down something as factual as extinction rate and climate change into political lines.
Unfortunately there will be deniers
To be fair humans can't even grasp numbers larger than 10. We've achieved a lot via abstraction and written language, but to internalize huge concepts like specie variation, evolution, extinction is really tough. You can read about it, but you can't really "feel" it.
Omg I hadn't realized. Where are my blacks?Huge Wayward Pines Spoilers:
It's all good, just start freezing all the white and Asian people in Idaho
At this point I would love some overwhelmingly good news about the future of humanity, just to shake things up
We'll go extinct at some point as well!
we have a process called peer review in which data is poured over exhaustively and confirmed and re-confirmed or else the scientific community calls you out on it and tosses your study in the garbage, as has happened a zillion times in the past
but you know if the evil scientist shadow organization existed, that prooobably wouldn't have happened. Scientists don't need 'doomsday' to get funding, there are enough actual reasons - both in investments in bettering mankind's technological future, expanding food stores and fighting diseases and other such things - that they don't also need to pretend that bad shit is happening to the Earth.
It's happening. The data is real. Devil's Advocacy denied.
At this point I would love some overwhelmingly good news about the future of humanity, just to shake things up
So it is the sixth mass extinction event.
Philosophically, how is it different from the previous five?
What is the difference between human activity and a big whopping rock dropping from space?
Wasn't meant to.Woah man, you sure told him.
So it is the sixth mass extinction event.
Philosophically, how is it different from the previous five?
What is the difference between human activity and a big whopping rock dropping from space?
I agree, by the way. However, most will only believe it if it affects them personally.
Durask said:So it is the sixth mass extinction event.
Philosophically, how is it different from the previous five?
What is the difference between human activity and a big whopping rock dropping from space?
Are there specific species that if wiped out would destroy humanity ?
Can't we get to a point where we can recreate species though genetic engineering?
We're not a good species, are we?
So it is the sixth mass extinction event.
Philosophically, how is it different from the previous five?
What is the difference between human activity and a big whopping rock dropping from space?
I genuinely think we will be okay. Things may change, people will die, but life, uhhhh, finds a way.
So it is the sixth mass extinction event.
Philosophically, how is it different from the previous five?
What is the difference between human activity and a big whopping rock dropping from space?
The difference is a rock can't post on NeoGAF about it and raise awareness.
UNLESS AMIROX IS SECRETLY AN AMIROCK
Amirox is secretly an Amiibo
Reminds me of that bit in Guns, Germs and Steel where the author points out this weird thing that tends to happen to macrofauna when humanity is suddenly introduced into their environment.
This is news to people?
Witness the extinction of Australian mega fauna that coincided with the first humans in Australia, then the second wave after European settlement. Humans are selfish. I am too. It's not going to change, or at least change enough to make much of a difference.
We're not a good species, are we?
Well in a purely evolutionary sense we are king of the hill supposedly. But then again we are so stupid we will eventually render the planet unsuitable for us. So maybe we arent even that.
This is news to people?
Unfortunately there will be deniers
I don't see anything other than wiping out half of humanity as a possible solution.
Well in a purely evolutionary sense we are king of the hill supposedly. But then again we are so stupid we will eventually render the planet unsuitable for us. So maybe we arent even that.
God forbid we be a little skeptical and not get it our bunkers yet. One study does not a fact make. Peer reviews are necessary, further studies should be conducted. I'm not saying the study couldn't be accurate but lets not panic.
The oft-repeated claim that Earth’s biota is entering a sixth “mass extinction” depends on clearly demonstrating that current extinction rates are far above the “background” rates prevailing in the five previous mass extinctions. Earlier estimates of extinction rates have been criticized for using assumptions that might overestimate the severity of the extinction crisis. We assess, using extremely conservative assumptions, whether human activities are causing a mass extinction. First, we use a recent estimate of a background rate of 2 mammal extinctions per 10,000 species per 100 years (that is, 2 E/MSY), which is twice as high as widely used previous estimates.
God forbid we be a little skeptical and not get it our bunkers yet. One study does not a fact make. Peer reviews are necessary, further studies should be conducted. I'm not saying the study couldn't be accurate but lets not panic.
God forbid we be a little skeptical and not get it our bunkers yet. One study does not a fact make. Peer reviews are necessary, further studies should be conducted. I'm not saying the study couldn't be accurate but lets not panic.
What does "official" mean here?
I can't believe all the joke and might hearted posts in this thread.
This is literally a study that is meant to check many past studies and see if the criticisms against them had any merit. To do this, they checked all available data and used the most ridiculously conservative estimates possible in their formula to see if it could still be considered a mass extinction event, and even with those estimates we are well beyond what would be considered entering one. You could say it was the most powerful peer review of the issue yet.
Read:
Even if that is the case. As the study states, there's still time to turn things around. Whether humanity has the will to do so however is another matter.
We deserve it.
We're fucking shit. All of us. We deserve to be wiped off the face of the earth.
Everyone, let us be honest with ourselves.
There is no method possible to avert the impending disaster, or to mitigate the damage already caused.
Yes, theoretically if the entire world banded together, there is a large chance of salvation. This event will never happen. The developing world views it as only fair, after years of subjugation, to industrialise, regardless of the ramifications. The developed world is mostly apathetic, used to the energy inefficient way of life. This does not take into account unstable regions.
I do my part because I at least wish to pretend as if there is a chance. But unless a technology is developed that is able to alter the world's chemical output, I imagine the rest of this century and beyond will fare poorly.