• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

We need to talk about the online radicalisation of young, white men

Status
Not open for further replies.

G.O.O.

Member
#NotAllWhites, obviously, but there's a sense of entitlement running in white male culture. That if you're good, women owe you sex, and if they don't agree and ditch you for a jerk they're sluts and it's their fault. Same, minorities owe you for being in *your* country, and should leave if they don't admit your culture is superior, things like that.
 

Soph

Member
It is kind of weird that when I was 16-19 and aggressively hunting women to bed, I got one every other week. Past 10 years I've been more of a model man and got none whatsoever.

Sure it's a personal anecdote, but I can see where they get this cuck/alphamale thing from.
 

Imm0rt4l

Member
So is sexually frustrated the new economic anxiety?
This actually has merit. Sexual frustration is found in all the most toxic, predominantly male and or nerdy communities. Guys find these spaces where they commiserate with others who share in their entitlement/sexism. Doesn't change the fact that they are or become racist af. I think it's really the jumping off point. Elliot Rodgers was bemoaning how someone he perceived to be beneath him(a black man) could so easily take something he felt should belong to him, a white girl. There's an intersection of sexism and racism in that case.
 
We need to have less racist threads on NeoGAF first. What this "white" even mean?

It's no more or less racist than a thread about the radicalization of young, Muslim men would be. That is to say, not racist at all, though some posts may lean in that direction.

It's just acknowledging a problem that needs to be addressed.
 

patapuf

Member
So is sexually frustrated the new economic anxiety?

Aren't these pretty well established scources of radicalisation?

I don't really get the sarcasm behind the terms i've seen recently. The real life consequences are terrifying enough.

#NotAllWhites, obviously, but there's a sense of entitlement running in white male culture. That if you're good, women owe you sex, and if they don't agree and ditch you for a jerk they're sluts and it's their fault. Same, minorities owe you for being in *your* country, and should leave if they don't admit your culture is superior, things like that.

I may be wrong, but i'm pretty sure you find similar attitudes everywhere.
 
Perhaps the root of all these issues is that these kids can't get laid. They need to feel appreciated, and they haven't been taught how to accomplish that. So they grow with resentment against society.

Most of these men are hateful, bitter, and miserable. Who would want to be involved with someone like that? It's their own damn fault. At some point you have to let those negative feelings go or they will destroy you.
 

Morat

Banned
We need to have less racist and sexit threads on NeoGAF first. What this "white" even mean?


I mean, you would have a point if this thread was about all white men, and we lived in an atmosphere where white men were persecuted and scapegoated. As it is, your comment appears to be bait
 

Ainsz

Member
"The first rule of Project Mayhem is you do not ask questions, sir!"

Honestly, this culture and mentality is old news. It sounded like most of these reporters had gone on the internet for their first time when they saw the horrors.
 

deadlast

Member
This actually has merit. Sexual frustration is found in all the most toxic, predominantly male and or nerdy communities. Guys find these spaces where they commiserate with others who share in their entitlement/sexism. Doesn't change the fact that they are or become racist af. I think it's really the jumping off point. Elliot Rodgers was bemoaning how someone he perceived to be beneath him(a black man) could so easily take something he felt should belong to him, a white girl. There's an intersection of sexism and racism in that case.

That's just not sexual frustration, that's programmed racist attitude over years.
Remember that one dude in California that stabbed all those people, because he was angry that Indian students were getting girls he couldn't ?
At the end I think it has a lot to do with toxic racist views and sexual frustration.
 
Serious mental issues need serious psychological assistance. ^ Just in case anybody has forgotten, that is Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of Sandy Hook. Anybody want to question the fact that not only was he a sexually frustrated white teenager, he was also, as this photo aptly demonstrates, completely mentally unhinged.

And you just did exactly what he wanted.
 

Lime

Member
It's kinda chilling. I just happened to watch Denis Villeneuve's Polytechnique last night. It's about the shooting in 1989, where the shooter was a frustrated anti-feminist white male. After that word comes out that the Quebec mosque shooter is a frustrated anti-muslim white male. It's been almost 30 years between the two shootings, and in the US there have been countless of these shooting inbetween. Nothing seems to be changing. Isolation, frustration with society, paranoia, anti-social tendencies. What can be done to prevent these things from turning these troubled people into weapons of pure hatred? I mean yeah, they're fucked up people, but what can be done aside from acknowledging how fucked up they are?

The problem is also the constant narrative of the "Lone Wolf" that automatically absolves responsibilities from other parties and shrouds a view of the collective aspects of how these people become so violent and radicalized.

Breivik didn't act on his own, neither did Dylan Roof, or this Quebec shooter. They are all part of online communities like Gamergate, MRA, Stormfront, etc. that propagate and egg each other in dominating other identity groups. And the media and society refuse to look at these communities by viewing the problem in isolation as this "lone wolf" acting by himself.
 
We need to have less racist and sexit threads on NeoGAF first. What this "white" even mean?

It means that some families in the near east wandered west instead of east when the ice age thawed. Surely this instinctual preference for the wrong compass direction marks them out as the agents of satan who can only do evil on this world. Only the males though for the mark of the beast only flows down the line of sons not daughters.

Yeah it's nonsense. There is little difference between Germans and Syrian or Iranians when it comes to genetic history. Mostly the differences are cultural. Language and religion and so on.

Perhaps the term "White" has some secret occult meaning to some people who popularised the term or whatever. Nothing useful to rational people.
 
From BBC:
Omar spoke online about his early life and what set him on a path towards radicalism.
"My childhood was good, nothing out of the ordinary," he explains, but then he says he became a "lost sheep".
"I started to question 'what am I doing?'"
A school friend said Omar "became progressively religious" to "calm himself down a bit".
Omar, like other young jihadis originally from Britain, claims that events following the 9/11 attacks in the US and "unjust Western foreign policy" have been a key motivating force for them.
"I remember seeing the Twin Towers collapse," Omar says, "...thinking it was in the UK, but then read a subtitle that said 'happened in America'..."
"I didn't [at first] pay much attention... but that triggered a long-term effect on me."
Sound familiar?

Isolation, alongside the feeling that society has let you down. So you go looking for a group where you can fit in. For ISIS recruits it was religious extremism. For young white men it seems to start off with PUA culture until they've fully immersed themselves in to alt-right/white supremacy.
 
So is sexually frustrated the new economic anxiety?

Is it sexual frustration, or is it an inability to exert their patriarchal control on women? My personal perspective is that these are men who are incapable of accepting that they are being denied the privilege they feel is rightfully theirs, which manifests in displays of toxic masculinity.
 
Most of these men are hateful, bitter, and miserable. Who would want to be involved with someone like that? It's their own damn fault. At some point you have to let those negative feelings go or they will destroy you.

But what comes first? Is it because they are that way that they don't get the attention they crave, or is it that rejection has warped their minds?
 
Young white men need to get laid more often. Not even kidding, if you want to combat this by the back door (so to speak, ie without creating confrontational programs, aimed explicitly at de-radicalisation, and which would be easy targets for politicised misinterpretation [liberal conspiracy!]), then direct your efforts towards getting young (white) men into happy, fulfilling sexual relationships ASAP.
 

norog

Member
Obviously all these 'sexually frustrated' young men should just start having sex with each other. Problem solved!
 
Frankly, I don't trust a theguardian.com based article on "white men" to be a good starting point to address anything.

I agree that heavy topics need to be presented carefully and respectfully, but I think the OP does so. White men are the ones being targeted, so it's reasonable that they would be called out by name.

These people need help -- for our sake and theirs -- and they aren't going to get it if the problem doesn't enter mainstream consciousness.
 

patapuf

Member
Young white men need to get laid more often. Not even kidding, if you want to combat this by the back door (so to speak, ie without creating confrontational programs, aimed explicitly at de-radicalisation, and which would be easy targets for politicised misinterpretation [liberal conspiracy!]), then direct your efforts towards getting young (white) men into happy, fulfilling sexual relationships ASAP.

You won't be able to get to every frustrated young man and solve his problems, sexual or otherwise.

Programs designed to help socially isolated (and probably depressed) people aren't confrontational. The problem is reaching these people. "Young white men aren't exactly known to be big on talking aobut their problems/preconceptions. And there's a lot of stigma around it to boot.

At the same time, letting radicalised communities fester online can be dangerous. They can be the final push needed for someone to go from frustrated and depressed to a radical willing to murder. A balance has to be found when it's necessary to shut one down.

I think things can be done to help, even though you'll never be able to prevent 100 percent of cases.
 

bengraven

Member
I was just accused of this.

Only the liberal side. Because I'm allowing treehugging f-words to program me to accept terrorists into this country. And that I'm a threat to national security. And I should cut off social media before i let gays and PETA turn me into a homosexual jihadist. That black and Iraqi liberals on gaming forums are turning me soft and yet apparently dangerous.

And that my son was going to turn out gay because "I'm not doing anything to prevent it".

It was that pic of he little girl in Lady Liberty's arms that set off this anger. From my dad and uncle.
 

Mr. RHC

Member
I agree that heavy topics need to be presented carefully and respectfully, but I think the OP does so. White men are the ones being targeted, so it's reasonable that they would be called out by name.

These people need help -- for our sake and theirs -- and they aren't going to get it if the problem doesn't enter mainstream consciousness.


Oh right but the Guardian is not going to help anyone. They are going to help themselves and their impressions by inciting racial fragility hatred in those most susceptible to it and it seems to be working because there are a lot "hate white" articles on their frontpage.

I check that site from time to time and I can't help the feeling that it's been a cesspool for a while now. Such a low effort journalism, I've been visiting it less and less.
 

gcubed

Member
Social media and the internet was caught with it's pants down due to the libertarian nature of most of its creators. A free platform for any speech combined with anonymity and all the sites refusal to moderate in search of valuable dialog opened the doors.

For years the people who now commune online with like minded individuals around the world only had local outlets that were often shunned or meet in secret. No anonymity and no Google phone book for "where can I talk to people who want to kill n* and Jews"

Now there are clubs where millions of like minded bigots from around the world can meet and encourage with nary a whimper of censorship. Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc can't put the genie back in the bottle now, but it is all their faults for the current chest thumping.

Honestly, you aren't going to get rid of it, but you can make it go back in hiding. Punching Spencer in the face is a good start. Publicly outing identities, getting people fired, etc will all have a cumulative effect to pushing it back in the shadows. Hugging it out may work in a one on one basis but appeasement to the group is not a viable path forward
 

G.O.O.

Member
I may be wrong, but i'm pretty sure you find similar attitudes everywhere.
Think locker room talk, and massive use of negative stereotypes. None of them are aimed at white males.

Again it's not to say there's something inherently wrong about being white, nor that other cultures don't have their own flaws with dealing with race or gender issues. But there's something that goes with the notion of privilege, and the fact that you're less of a man for not claiming what you're entitled to. Violence being seen as an appropriate way to gain your status back.
 
Oh right but the Guardian is not going to help anyone. They are going to help themselves and their impressions by inciting racial fragility hatred in those most susceptible to it and it seems to be working because there are a lot "hate white" articles on their frontpage.

I check that site from time to time and I can't help the feeling that it's been a cesspool for a while now. Such a low effort journalism, I've been visiting it less and less.
What even is this?
 

LionPride

Banned
SEX ISN'T THAT SERIOUS! NO ONE CARES THAT YOU CAN'T GET LAID BUT YOU! DON'T BECOME A TERRIBLE PERSON BECAUSE MONICA WON'T FUCK YOU!

Damn
 

Shredderi

Member
Is it sexual frustration, or is it an inability to exert their patriarchal control on women? My personal perspective is that these are men who are incapable of accepting that they are being denied the privilege they feel is rightfully theirs, which manifests in displays of toxic masculinity.

As a pretty "lonely" guy with no real success with women in god- knows- how- many- years- now, I've seen a lot of these fringe cases and it's definitely more about the sexual frustration and it's snowball effects.
 

Ewo

Member
Honestly, the easiest way for someone to reject a group like this is if the group rejects them first. The thing that was the catalyst for me fully burning bridges with 4chan types was an entire IRC channel dogpiling on me and calling me a rapist (for me saying a trans person outing themselves in the bedroom, not even undressing, isn't rape).

Don't really know how this could be coaxed to happen more often, but it got me to be the person always bitching about "triggered" jokes that I am.
 

norinrad

Member
I was just accused of this.

Only the liberal side. Because I'm allowing treehugging f-words to program me to accept terrorists into this country. And that I'm a threat to national security. And I should cut off social media before i let gays and PETA turn me into a homosexual jihadist. That black and Iraqi liberals on gaming forums are turning me soft and yet apparently dangerous.

And that my son was going to turn out gay because "I'm not doing anything to prevent it".

It was that pic of he little girl in Lady Liberty's arms that set off this anger. From my dad and uncle.

Anger? I'd keep my son away from them if i were you. Once they get into his head, its going to be impossible for you to get closer to your son.
 
SEX ISN'T THAT SERIOUS! NO ONE CARES THAT YOU CAN'T GET LAID BUT YOU! DON'T BECOME A TERRIBLE PERSON BECAUSE MONICA WON'T FUCK YOU!

Damn
Right? Ain't gotten laid in months can I throw that excuse around if I cold cock somebody? Oh sorry your honor I just needed a sleepy hj and all this would have been avoided.

Being an outcast is not an excuse to be a shitty human being. Being a shitty human being is probably a big reason why they are outcasts.
 

patapuf

Member
Right? Ain't gotten laid in months can I throw that excuse around if I cold cock somebody? Oh sorry your honor I just needed a sleepy hj and all this would have been avoided.

Being an outcast is not an excuse to be a shitty human being. Being a shitty human being is probably a big reason why they are outcasts.

Right. I don't think explaining why someone becomes radicalised absolves them of guilt. Just like explaining why someone is a murderer doesn't absolve them of their murder.

Having lots of radicalized people around is bad for society though.

Just like we have various crime prevention programs we keep adjusting, we might need to adjust some of the things in place to prevent radicalisation.


Think locker room talk, and massive use of negative stereotypes. None of them are aimed at white males.

Again it's not to say there's something inherently wrong about being white, nor that other cultures don't have their own flaws with dealing with race or gender issues. But there's something that goes with the notion of privilege, and the fact that you're less of a man for not claiming what you're entitled to. Violence being seen as an appropriate way to gain your status back.

I agree that these attitudes are part of the problem.
 
Reading the Guardian article makes me wonder a few things that maybe people can clarify.

1. These kids seem largely bullied and rejected by women, is that correct?
2. Are American schools actually as bad with bullying/are people actually as cruel as they appear to be in movies and TV?

Seems like these kids are basically rejects from school who want to know how to get women and then get stealthily brainwashed by utter pricks and once the brainwashing is done they then pass it down the line.

-edit-
Just saw how the last page went. Not justifying them. Just trying to get to why they'd even entertain this, nobody is born a cunt.
 
This is something I've seen first hand. A buddy of mine from college was always ripe for this sort of thing.

He was always super shy and was obviously a huge fan of anime and video games. He'd spend all his time in his dorm. And I get that. I'm a bit of a loner myself. But even if you like anime and games, on my dorm there were always a number of people playing video games in the commons including myself and there were social clubs you could join as well. Maybe not the most lively of social events and it's hella fucking nerdy but hey we're gaming and hanging out with buddies and having a good time and it wasn't complete isolation. It was always a pain getting him to leave his room to come out and hang out with us, even though it made perfect sense. We were like the perfect fit for him as far as having a social group.

That's not to say he didn't like us at all. Because he was always very eager to chat online through IMs and through texts. He was just a big recluse. I don't know whether it was anxiety or depression or just who he was. But I liked the guy well enough and we hung out a number of times even after college.

And it's no surprise that he ended up being the kind of person who never had a girlfriend despite clearing and desperately wanting one. He'd agonize over it all the time. But instead of working to be a sociable likable person he'd spend all his time not at work reading MRA and libertarian stuff, which appealed to him and probably made him feel better about his loneliness and inadequacies. Which always baffled me because it's not like he didn't have outlets to potentially socialize with and meet people. I personally gave him plenty. He'd always send me links to read that stuff since he clearly thought I was a smart guy but was also diametrically opposite in terms of his ideological leaning and I'd point out how this stuff was wrong and I'd actually change his mind about a lot of things. Even though he had these sorts of leanings, he was still reachable and reasonable.

But obviously, friendships aren't built and maintained by sending 5,000 word libertarian articles at people so naturally we stopped talking and drifted away from each other. A few years later I say "hi" to him, curious about how he's been doing and in my absence he became a full-on gamergater, alt-right nazi type. It wasn't a surprise I at all but it was definitely a bummer. He was always at risk for this sort of thing. It was just kind of a vicious cycle. He was a shy loner, so he tried to spend all his time being alone, which left him with inadequate social skills, which made it harder for him to make friends, which meant he spent more time being alone. And it all just made him really susceptible to this sort of thing. I don't really know how someone could have prevented him from being radicalized. There's only so much you can do to try and hold someone's hand.
 

Apathy

Member
Young white men need to get laid more often. Not even kidding, if you want to combat this by the back door (so to speak, ie without creating confrontational programs, aimed explicitly at de-radicalisation, and which would be easy targets for politicised misinterpretation [liberal conspiracy!]), then direct your efforts towards getting young (white) men into happy, fulfilling sexual relationships ASAP.

Let's do everything possible to get little Bobby into a relationship so he can fuck instead of him just not being a shitty human being on his own. Wtf. Like how much more codling are we going to suggest for white boys? Get every advantage possible in western society and we're the one that still have to bend over backwards to get them laid too just to try to avoid them going stupid and killing innocent people.
 

Formless

Member
I know grown men who are into extreme MRA/red pill stuff. It seems like they were screwed in life by people in general and vehemently pursue any line of hypocrisy to its extreme.
 

Mawnster

Member
Young white men need to get laid more often. Not even kidding, if you want to combat this by the back door (so to speak, ie without creating confrontational programs, aimed explicitly at de-radicalisation, and which would be easy targets for politicised misinterpretation [liberal conspiracy!]), then direct your efforts towards getting young (white) men into happy, fulfilling sexual relationships ASAP.

I agree with everything in your post except for your first sentence. Maybe it was the way you worded it. I don't know. Thing is, why is getting laid so important? Why can't we teach them this thing that LionPride said?

SEX ISN'T THAT SERIOUS! NO ONE CARES THAT YOU CAN'T GET LAID BUT YOU! DON'T BECOME A TERRIBLE PERSON BECAUSE MONICA WON'T FUCK YOU!

Damn

They don't need to get laid more often. They just need to learn how to function like normal human beings and understand that it's okay if you don't have sex every day of the week. If anything, teach them how to interact with other people or help them improve their social skills. This way they might be able to get a girlfriend and as a consequence, a fullfilling sexual relationship, like you said.
 
Two articles for those interested in why there is a weird sex/violence link only in men.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3380604/#!po=40.5172

http://www.klab.caltech.edu/koch/CR/CR-Hypothalamus-11.pdf

And a bonus video of mouse mind control on this very region

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PTWsr8UuSnc

Telling someone to just get over what they feel is a crippling isolation is like telling someone don't let your brain atrophy into early on set dementia in extended periods of solitary confinement. In reality you are right, no justification for these heinous acts or even the culture and bubble that catalyzes them. But as we will continue to learn in politics and the world, to the brain, perception is often reality.
 
Insofar as it will be roundly mocked and dismissed by most of NeoGaf without much deeper thought, allowing the problems to persist and flourish, yes.

This is more true than it should be. Nothing will change for the bether unless people are willing to seriously discuss and research the problems facing us. When we have methods to combat these problems that are proven to work we get to work implementing them; in schools, offices, labs, meda, studios, government, everywhere.
 

diaspora

Member
Confront them Talk to them. Debate them. Acknowledge they exist. That it's not just a lone shooter.

I have a distant friend in Toronto who's recently gone deep into the alt-right bandwagon. All of my other friends knew for months and never talked to him about it. They still don't. I'm the only one who has and I live 500km away. Their excuse is "it makes things awkward". "he's just venting", "it's all jokes man", "stop being such a SJW". And now his wife, who's a visible minority and was a bleeding liberal is now harping on Facebook about the SJWs ruining everything.

In comparison if anyone in my family tried to express any extremist Muslim thoughts, most everyone in my family would confront them. We wouldn't brush it off as them just having a bad day. We take this very seriously. I take this very seriously.

He sounds like a mass shooting waiting to happen.
 
Honestly, you aren't going to get rid of it, but you can make it go back in hiding. Punching Spencer in the face is a good start. Publicly outing identities, getting people fired, etc will all have a cumulative effect to pushing it back in the shadows. Hugging it out may work in a one on one basis but appeasement to the group is not a viable path forward

Acts of violence and doxxing are never the solution. Going down that rabbit hole makes you no better then those you purport to fight. All you do is bring everyone down to that level and then they have won.

I don't know the solution to the problem, but it's sure not that. It's a shame that people have radicalized and political discourse in general has become polarized to the degree it has.
 

Maledict

Member
Let's do everything possible to get little Bobby into a relationship so he can fuck instead of him just not being a shitty human being on his own. Wtf. Like how much more codling are we going to suggest for white boys? Get every advantage possible in western society and we're the one that still have to bend over backwards to get them laid too just to try to avoid them going stupid and killing innocent people.

I do think it odd that straight white guys get the excuse of a lack of sex, but gay guys who go through far worse aren't blowing the shit out of churches and mosques. Hell, I went through years of agony as a teenager dealing with my sexuality, including the fact I couldn't even tell people or contemplate having sex. Same goes for young black straight men who face exactly the same issues - yet to see them walk into a congregation and start shooting.
 

Griss

Member
SEX ISN'T THAT SERIOUS! NO ONE CARES THAT YOU CAN'T GET LAID BUT YOU! DON'T BECOME A TERRIBLE PERSON BECAUSE MONICA WON'T FUCK YOU!

Damn

Sex is incredibly serious, incredibly important. Young men put a tremendous amount of value on being able to get laid and it makes 100% sense to me why they do so.

Reasons why the ability to get laid is important:
1. People need affection and companionship to be happy. Romantic affection is gated behind the ability to get laid and satisfy a partner.
2. Do you dream of starting a family one day? Won't happen if you never get laid.
3. Your respect in a male group will be damaged by this issue, leading to self-esteem issues. If that group rejects you your social circle can crash around you leading to isolation. Your friends can end up excluding you from mixed-gender events if you can't get laid - it becomes awkward for the guys who are, and hinders their efforts. I've seen this first-hand from high school to two colleges. That guy people are happy to have around unless they're going somewhere to party or get laid, in which case he doesn't get an invite.
4. Your sense of physical self-worth will be damaged by not being able to get laid, leading to body image issues.
5. Having a girlfriend is often a guy's best way of being exposed to female circles of friends. Without this continuing exposure, guys can fail to understand and sympathise with girls, and start to 'other' them on these toxic sites online. No, that's not a good excuse, but yes I believe it happens.

And so on and so forth. Sex is a tremendously important part of human life. Someone who has never had any success in that area is naturally bound to be extremely frustrated, upset and demoralised. Entitlement has nothing to do with it. Nobody has the right to get laid - and I really believe that young men understand that - but that doesn't stop it being extremely upsetting for those who can't.

The luxury of saying "sex isn't that great, and not terribly important" is one enjoyed by people who have enough experience of it to know that. Those who don't have such experience cannot know such things, and to them it appears to be a massive gaping absence in their lives, one that can cause crippling self-doubt, social anxiety, depression.

A high-school friend of mine killed himself when he was 19 in college because of lack of success with women. He was successful in every other way - a star athlete in rugby, even, and beloved by his friends - but he was somewhat ugly and nervous around girls and the issue grew and grew and grew until it dominated his thoughts and he became depressed. That caused a spiral he could not recover from. I will never forget it, I can't forget it. I suppose some guys take that pain and violence and turn it outwards instead of inwards.

There's no easy solution to sexually frustrated young men. I don't think legalised prostitution would help much because you still have the self-esteem issues (I have to pay for it - I'm a loser), you still have a majority of young men who wouldn't be able to afford it and you still have an absence of affection, which is what I'm convinced people need for their mental health, and was the thing my friend was desperate for. Affection.

More education and better mental health care would be a start but there are always going to be these angry isolated dudes, I fear.

EDIT: Most of the guys I knew in college who couldn't get laid went on to have little to no success with women in the years following. I do believe that if you can't figure it out during your 3 to 4 years surrounded by friendly young women then you're in trouble long-term. I know plenty of college friends who are still virgins 13 years on from then. People are married with kids but these guys live alone. I can't see how the ability to get laid could have more of an effect on your life, really.
 
But what comes first? Is it because they are that way that they don't get the attention they crave, or is it that rejection has warped their minds?

It's both, they're mutually reinforcing.

But at some point people need to understand (or have someone help them understand) that all the anger and insecurity they feel are precisely the things that are truly holding them down. They have the power to let go of that and find outlets that will bring positive change into their lives. They just need to realize that. Helping to accelerate or make possible that realization is the crux of the problem in my opinion.
 
I do think it odd that straight white guys get the excuse of a lack of sex, but gay guys who go through far worse aren't blowing the shit out of churches and mosques. Hell, I went through years of agony as a teenager dealing with my sexuality, including the fact I couldn't even tell people or contemplate having sex. Same goes for young black straight men who face exactly the same issues - yet to see them walk into a congregation and start shooting.
But this explanation is also for young Muslim men that join ISIS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom