Sakura Doritos
Member
Movies of the 70s, 80s, and 90s are better. Not just in US but around the globe.
Older movies (action, horror, sci fi, fantasy)Movies of the 70s, 80s, and 90s are better. Not just in US but around the globe.
i like plenty of stuff from most of the eras
2010s seems kinda abysmal tho, gotta go back and reevaluate
all those are shit lolSome of my fave films have come out this past decade.
Interstellar
Whiplash
Wolf of Wallstreet
Birdman
What we do in the Shadows
Mad Max Fury Road
The Social Network
Inception
Annihilation
And many more.
all those are shit lol
takes one to know oneYou're shit.
Some of my fave films have come out this past decade.
Interstellar
Whiplash
Wolf of Wallstreet
Birdman
What we do in the Shadows
Mad Max Fury Road
The Social Network
Inception
Annihilation
And many more.
next weekend is a Goonies/Beetlejuice double feature at the drive in near me. i'm like, damn, that is 4 hours of heaven.
yes. it's important to look at the history of the industry too. the 60s-70s had the collapse of the studio system, the rise of the independent filmmaker. this occurred with had the first generation of trained people who went to "film school". which itself was kind of a new thing, and not yet blanded down into formula-and-software based filmmaking like the corporate culture we have today.
the interesting thing is, none of this was "totally new never before seen" but in a way it was. Close Encounters and ET and Alien are basically 70s big budget prestigue movie updates on the UFO b-movies of the 50s and 60s that these filmmakers grew up watching. Star Wars is a mix of a bunch of Lucas's childhood (meaning ages 0-early 20s) like spaghetti westerns and Flash Gordon all rolled together.
the trick is, they took something old, then told THEIR OWN VERSION OF IT. George Lucas didn't just drop Frankenstein's monster in there, he made Darth Vader. Harold Ramis didn't just remake Abbott and Costello Meet the Wolfman, he combined horror and comedy into something new. Joe Dante didn't just remake and old monster movie, he created Gremlins. they mined the dead body of nostalgia for new works but they didn't fall into the trap of trying to necromancer the corpse itself back to life.
the new people just straight up use the original IP, characters and all, without bothering to reinterpret them through their own eyes and actually make something new. i think this is one reason the Mary Sue or fan insert is so popular. the creator has done no creating, there is nothing of themselves in the work if he makes, say, another Star Wars. so they use the IP to glorify their own egos, whether that be reliving their childhood (JJ making Han Solo like his favorite version of him and rebooting the ST to have the same plot as the films of his childhood) or "subverting expectations" (Rian Johnson doing the opposite of what you expect in a desperate attempt to look original). the end result is hollow and soulless and i would argue not really creative at all.
I mean no doubt that there were amazing movies in the last 20 years.Whiplash is easily one of my favorite films as well. It's perfect in every way.
Drive is some next-level stuff, too.
Some obvious (and not so obvious) picks IMO :
Top 100 Films of the 2010's
A list of 100 films compiled on Letterboxd, including Whiplash (2014), Inception (2010), Blade Runner 2049 (2017), Drive (2011) and Boyhood (2014).letterboxd.com
70 and 80 is still my personal golden age for film. But yes movies were better. Script writing in particular seems like a lost art these days.
Plenty of shit, there always is, but the god stuff is so far ahead of what we see today.Partly Nostalgia, there was plenty of shit released, you just don't hear about it and it's been forgotten outside of Wikipedia and iMDb.
So you're using the opinion of the people least likely to have a valid one as the basis of your argument?It's just nostalgia, people born in the late 90's or early 2000's don't care about those films.
It's just nostalgia, people born in the late 90's or early 2000's don't care about those films.
It's weird because film as an art form has definitely evolved. Which makes sense, art forms standards are intended to progress over time.
Technology has improved, camera techniques have improved, movies are more quickly paced and attention grabbing these days.
The problem is that ever since the big bang of the modern blockbuster, that style of film making has proven too effective and now studios are less willing to bank on anything more artful to guarantee an ROI.
In theory, movies should be better - and the great ones now are just as awesome as the classics, if not better - but the problem is that everything now feels like one long toy commercial aimed at a social media attention span - because it absolutely is.
An independent film renaissance really needs to comes and wash over the industry. The technology is too available, and with theaters dying, and digital being our obvious future - we need to get these more earnest creative types able to make what they'd like with less financial risk so that they don't have to bow to focus tested nonsense.
I'm rambling, as per usual, but I have a point.
Watchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?I'd rather watch Big Bang Theory than stream or torrent any of these. Golden Girls (not pictured) is probably the best one lol
It was a bore fest.Interstellar was shit. Why people like that movie is beyond me.
Love me some good space movie, but most of it wasnt even about space travel.
I agree, my defense would be stronger for 80's and 90's it was just the 80's. The movies and TV shows of the 70's were far better than the 90's. Early 90's wasn't too bad, though. Ever watch Spontaneous Combustion with Brad Dourif? That was a good one from about 1990.Came to say this. The 90s are missing something for me compared to the art that came out in the 70s and the bombastic 80s.
Bullshit, get them to watch Terminator 2, Jumanji, Jurassic Park, Alien, The Thing, The Shining, Indiana Jones, The Goonies... my son was blown away by T2, he's 10. Young John Connor is as awesome to them as he was to us growing up.
Great movies are great movies, period.
I mean no doubt that there were amazing movies in the last 20 years.
Denis Villeneuve, Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino. They all made fantastic movies during that time period.
The problem is that these are a couple of peanuts you have to pick out of a steaming pile of shit.
One of the legit stupidest fucking things I've heard in my entire life. No offense.I'm born 87 and honestly it's really just the nostalgic factor . Movies are just as good nowadays and there are a lot of masterpieces in 2000s and onward .
One of the legit stupidest fucking things I've heard in my entire life. No offense.
Bullshit, get them to watch Terminator 2, Jumanji, Jurassic Park, Alien, The Thing, The Shining, Indiana Jones, The Goonies... my son was blown away by T2, he's 10. Young John Connor is as awesome to them as he was to us growing up.
Great movies are great movies, period.
I watched it with my son, it's fun but the og Jumanji is in another level, much higher production value.While I love Jumanji, it's mainly because of Robin Williams. I actually like Zathura more overall then I do Jumanji.
I loved Favreu's use of practical effects in Zathura.
Dude, you trippin. Alien and Aliens are still amongst the best horror and best sci-fi ever made.Only Terminator 2 , Jurassic Park and The Thing are still great if I were to rewatch this .
There are also a huge pile of shit from 80s and 90s .
I'm born 87 and honestly it's really just the nostalgic factor . Movies are just as good nowadays and there are a lot of masterpieces in 2000s and onward .
Dude, you trippin. Alien and Aliens are still amongst the best horror and best sci-fi ever made.
Indiana Jones is as entertaining as ever, so is Jumanji (despite the dated CGI). Goonies is a weird one and maybe it drags a bit too much, but the structure there is still solid. The Shining is awesome as well.
From what I can tell, you haven't seen much of these stuff, at least not now that you're an adult or in high quality.