Firstly, there are many similarities with the story beats in the prior book, Cibola Burn. Its not a verbatim copy, but both books start with a terrorist attack, both books have a planet thats devastated by an apocalyptic type event. In both books our main characters are separated for most of the story, and in both books Naomi is a prisoner, with, to begin with, some liberties, and to an extent is or becomes buddies with her jailor, or guard. Now I havent much else to say about this, other than I thought it stood out, that the story beats were so similar.
I did not understand the motivations of the belter rogue faction, theres still a need for transports between the thousands of new worlds that have opened, and their skills will be needed on the many ships making these transports. Besides, their ancestors once left earth, and colonized the asteroid belt, and they adapted, why couldnt they now adapt? It felt very heavy handed, and in no part of the book did I think they had a point. Which surprised me when Holden blurts out [Marco Inaros] is not wrong a few times in the book. My first reaction was oh get off it, everything is not grey, sometimes things are black and white, murdering a whole planet because you feel mistreated is always wrong, there is no grey zone. And this coming from Holden, a person who sees everything in black and white, but suddenly in this book, decides to see shades of grey, after a faction destroys earth, his home planet, where his 8 parents live. It felt very contrived, as if the writer wanted to force a conflict and in a way say The guy you thought was so evil, you know, hes really doing it for a good cause.
Didnt like the idea of trying to be put forth that pretty much everyone is redeemable either. Clarissa murdered her friend, she blew up a ship, she tried to kill Naomi, tried to destroy Holden, but shes sorry about it, really, so its ok now.
I can understand Amos being ok with that, hes after all a sociopath, but there is no way Ill accept the fact that Alex, Naomi or Holden would work with her, on their ship. And if Bobbie is to join their crew as well, I dont see Bobbie in anyway being ok with Clarissa being on board, but I guess thats another contrived conflict for the next book.
And moving on from there, Filip, yes hes Naomis son, and shell love her child no matter what, thats a given, but even if she loves her child, with all her heart, she must see and know that Filip isn't a good person, and is responsible for billions of deaths, and hes proud of it, it cannot be explained away, no matter how much you try.
Hes only 15
He murdered billions of people.
Hes really a good boy underneath it all
He murdered billions of people!
If he gets to be with his mother, hell be better
ok
but he murdered a whole damned planet!
Were not talking about a boyish prank, or that he found a gun in his parents cabinet, and accidentally shot his friend. He planned, and performed the murder of a planet, without a second thought.
And all this is trying to be juxtapositioned, with Naomis situation, as Naomi has done horrible things as well, she destroyed ships, if you as a reader are ok with Naomi being free, you should feel the same about Clarissa and Filip.
But Naomis action were done without any intention, they were not premeditated, she was writing a program to make ships better, or so she thought. She did not plan on murdering innocents in cold blood. And Cyn wasnt her friend, He was her jailer, no matter what they were once, he was her jailer now, and she wanted to flee. Clarissa in contrast murder her friend in cold blood. And trying to compare the two, just does not work.
A good writer can succeed in doing this, take GRRM as an example, he can write overlong passages, and chapters, and books about things that just make his stories halt (the last two books being the examples in my mind), and killing of his main characters left and right, and you still want to read his next book.
Or Joe Abercrombie, who can write loathsome characters, or totally damaged ones, and youre still interested in them. If you dont like them, you can see that they can exist, you dont agree with them, but you get their motivations. In this book, all characters are caricatures, and the antagonists are straight out of a B-movie.