In [undeserved] fairness, he might have come to it expecting to be something other than what it was. I had to adjust my expectations after first coming to it having read comparisons to Harry Potter. And if you come to a book with the wrong expectations, sometimes the gap between what you were expecting and what you got can make it harder to appreciate a book for what it is, on its terms.
Yeah, that's a grade equivalent reading score:
And this is a more elaborate explanation of how this works. I first learned about this through talking with a neighbor about her kids' reading levels, and how she learned what that phrase "reading at X grade level" means.
Like what about that one male friend he had that weird dream about.Finished reading few stuff. Read the new Murakami since I saw it was a short read and I sure as hell wasn't ever gonna finish going through 1Q84 and I started that 2 years ago. This story was alright, I never could particularly relate to Tazaki's loneliness and how his friends absence hurt him, just felt too artificial and not really special. Still, at least this was a bit concise and didn't drag on even though it left few questions unopened.
Finished reading few stuff. Read the new Murakami since I saw it was a short read and I sure as hell wasn't ever gonna finish going through 1Q84 and I started that 2 years ago. This story was alright, I never could particularly relate to Tazaki's loneliness and how his friends absence hurt him, just felt too artificial and not really special. Still, at least this was a bit concise and didn't drag on even though it left few questions unopened.
I picked up The Tokyo Zodiac Murders after I saw the author being mentioned in the manga thread. It has sort of an interesting setup, few drawings explaining the murder and what surprised me the most is two instances of the author interrupting the narrative and challenging the reader if they figured out the case. The actual murder resolution wasn't that impressive.
Augustus was pretty fantastic. It's divided into 3 parts, the first one being letters and parts of memoirs talking about Octavius raise to power after Caesar's death and eventually ending with his victory of Antony. I really enjoyed this part a lot especially cause I took a roman civilization course once in university so it was fun seeing the events unfold and how they compared to how I learned them. Second part mostly revolved around Augustus' family trouble, generally involving his daughter Julia. I'd imagine this is where John Williams took a lot of liberty with historical accuracy, but it helped providing more depth to the characters and seeing Rome from a different side. Then there is the last part where Augustus finally takes over the story and talks about his past and accomplishments. Really loved reading this, hopefully should find time soon to read William's other novel Stoner.
About to finish this:
I'm currently reading Good Omens for the first time, even though I've owned it for ages. I love reading books by both Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman.
Also rereading Rider at the Gate by C.J. Cherryh.
I'm currently reading Good Omens for the first time, even though I've owned it for ages. I love reading books by both Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman.
Also rereading Rider at the Gate by C.J. Cherryh.
I've read a few things by Cherryh, but it's been a long time. I remember her writing being frantic, almost too wordy. It felt both as if it set the stage for a thrilling adventure and simultaneously dronef on and on in meaningless detail. I don't know if I read Rider at the Gate though. Can't remember which books left me with this impression.Good Omens is an absolute delight, and you are the only person I've ever known to have read/be reading Rider at the Gate. Something about that book really tickled my imagination. That world and the creatures in the wild... Such subtle horror. Loved it.
I've read a few things by Cherryh, but it's been a long time. I remember her writing being frantic, almost too wordy. It felt both as if it set the stage for a thrilling adventure and simultaneously dronef on and on in meaningless detail. I don't know if I read Rider at the Gate though. Can't remember which books left me with this impression.
Mmmm... I can't say Rider at the Gate gave me that impression. Maybe you're thinking of some of her other sci-fi stuff? I suppose the switches between the riders and the nighthorses might come off a bit jerky, but I'm pretty sure that's intentional since the communication itself is kind of abrupt. I didn't find her too caught up in describing things, either, but I did read this one maybe... 15? years ago.
Finally watched Contact (with Jodie Foster), and I loved it to death. I know it's based on the book. So, Book-Gaf, how is the novel compared to the film?
I've actually wondered this as well. Love the movie, so the book has always been on my list of stuff to read someday, wonder how different they are.
Finished up "The Fallow Season of Hugo Hunter" last night. I think I'm just slightly disappointed that it never felt as good as the Edward books from the same author, so that was constantly hanging over my while reading, but it was a page turner, and did reach that point where I had to keep going to see where it all went.
I might read 'The Boy Who Couldn't Sleep And Never Had To" next.
RE: Contact. I liked the movie but I thought the book was better.
Well that's good to know, are they vastly different at all? I guess I just hold off on reading the book as a case of knowing what happens takes a bit of the thrill away.
I sitll really enjoyed the hourney, I just wish there was a little more journey. I don't even need a tight little bow to wrap it up. It just feels like the story has a little more to be told.Had this book merely been the third installment of a four (or more) book series this would have been a solid four star book. But because this is (as far as I am aware) the end of the line, the lack of closure and resolution really rankled me. If you are going to make me care so much about the characters in the story, at least do my the courtesy of telling me what befalls them.
Finally watched Contact (with Jodie Foster), and I loved it to death. I know it's based on the book. So, Book-Gaf, how is the novel compared to the film?
Finished this last night, While I still prefer the Farseer triliogy so far I am enjoying how this story is unfolding. The way the second book left things I cant wait to get started on Ship of Destiny, I think one of the characters I am most interested in seeing what happens next with them is Malta. Really looking forward to the eventual coming together of all the main characters.up until the later part of the 2nd book I have never wanted a child in a story killed off more than her, but the way her character is developing changed that view quite quickly
No. It's a not good book.For those who've read Mr. Mercedes by Stephen King. Does it pick up? I'm at about page 186, and I'm kinda bored. I keep renewing it from the library, but have little desire to read it. I would like to finish what I started, though.
Hmm... now you're asking for details. I want to say it wasn't vastly different. Sagan has an immense propensity for the scale of the universe that comes across in the book very well.
Someone with more recent knowledge or a better memory of the details might be able to correct me on the "vast difference" question.
Since some are talking about Stephen King, what are his *must-read* novels? I'm a complete newbie when it comes to his works.
Under the Dome is my favorite followed closely by 11/22/63. Of all his works I'd consider those must reads. The Stand and It were very good as well and I suggest you check them out. Everything else I've read by him has been good but I wouldn't necessarily label as "must read" (The Shining, The Mist, Duma Key, Mr Mercedes, Joyland, Dr. Sleep, Dark Tower 1 and 2).Since some are talking about Stephen King, what are his *must-read* novels? I'm a complete newbie when it comes to his works.
Augustus was pretty fantastic.
In roughly chronological order:Since some are talking about Stephen King, what are his *must-read* novels? I'm a complete newbie when it comes to his works.
IT and the stand.Since some are talking about Stephen King, what are his *must-read* novels? I'm a complete newbie when it comes to his works.
*snip*
I'm amazed of how many famous people he was friends with.
Do it. You won't regret it.Yeah, I expected a whole different type of animal than what I was given. This isn't the first time expectations has ruined a form of media (i.e. Bug). I may attempt to reread Earthsea in a year or so, now I have some idea what to expect from Guin's writing style.
-A Wizard of Earthsea, which I must echo the negative commands about the writing style above
I'm amazed of how many famous people he was friends with.
I'm no King buff, but I've read
The Stand
The Shining
The Dead Zone
All 3 were good, but I'd say The Stand is a must-read of King's.
Under the Dome is my favorite followed closely by 11/22/63. Of all his works I'd consider those must reads. The Stand and It were very good as well and I suggest you check them out. Everything else I've read by him has been good but I wouldn't necessarily label as "must read" (The Shining, The Mist, Duma Key, Mr Mercedes, Joyland, Dr. Sleep, Dark Tower 1 and 2).
In roughly chronological order:
Salem's Lot
The Long Walk (published under the Richard Bachman pseudonym)
The Shining
The Stand
It
Pet Sematary
The Dark Half (seriously underrated)
And then? If you love all those, you can try The Gunslinger (the first dark tower book) and explore other bits. But those are all solid brilliance.
IT and the stand.
Do it. You won't regret it.
Le Guin is my queen.
I'm literally crying.
I just haven't found a book I've enjoyed since I put Consider Phlebas on hold for being so generic.
Are we killing you and Mumei with our comments?