So I've had a Samsung Note 2 for over two years now and, as you're probably aware, it has TouchWiz, which is Samsung's Android skin. Every review I've ever read about Samsung devices have always mentioned this as a negative and bitched about how it's too "heavy" and "cumbersome" and "sluggish" over stock Android. In fact, every review of a phone or tablet that did have Android in its pure form (ie the Nexus line of products) have praised the experience.
My girlfriend got a Moto G (2nd gen) phone yesterday. It runs stock Android Kit Kat (4.4). I had to help her out since she's only used iPhones before, and I was actually pretty surprised at what I found.
Stock Android kind of sucks. It's missing small and yet substantial features that I've enjoyed on my Note 2 for years.
Example 1: It doesn't display your battery percentage. There is no option for this. This really boggles the mind. I had to search and install some 3rd party app on the Play Store, which doesn't work half the time.
Example 2: You cannot close all your open applications at once. You need to close them one by one. Samsung gives me a button to close all apps with one press.
Example 3: To access the screen brightness slider (something which I use a lot), you need to pull down the notification tab from the top, press the button on the top right, then press the brightness button. Touchwiz had the brightness slider right in the notification tab.
In addition, I don't have to search the countless shitty apps in the Play Store and widgets to get basic things like weather widgets, or flashlight functionality or video player that plays any format I throw at it, etc. I can go on, but I think you get my point.
These things may not seem like a big deal, but after using TouchWiz for 2 years, I want no part of stock Android. This is not to say Samsung's version of Android is the best (I'm sure LG's or HTC's versions are simillar), but Google missing basic features like this is a huge turnoff. So I really don't understand people's obsession with having a lack of basic features such as this, since as far as I can tell, stock Android has no visible performance superiority and I never experienced any "sluggishness" or whatever else on my device.
My girlfriend got a Moto G (2nd gen) phone yesterday. It runs stock Android Kit Kat (4.4). I had to help her out since she's only used iPhones before, and I was actually pretty surprised at what I found.
Stock Android kind of sucks. It's missing small and yet substantial features that I've enjoyed on my Note 2 for years.
Example 1: It doesn't display your battery percentage. There is no option for this. This really boggles the mind. I had to search and install some 3rd party app on the Play Store, which doesn't work half the time.
Example 2: You cannot close all your open applications at once. You need to close them one by one. Samsung gives me a button to close all apps with one press.
Example 3: To access the screen brightness slider (something which I use a lot), you need to pull down the notification tab from the top, press the button on the top right, then press the brightness button. Touchwiz had the brightness slider right in the notification tab.
In addition, I don't have to search the countless shitty apps in the Play Store and widgets to get basic things like weather widgets, or flashlight functionality or video player that plays any format I throw at it, etc. I can go on, but I think you get my point.
These things may not seem like a big deal, but after using TouchWiz for 2 years, I want no part of stock Android. This is not to say Samsung's version of Android is the best (I'm sure LG's or HTC's versions are simillar), but Google missing basic features like this is a huge turnoff. So I really don't understand people's obsession with having a lack of basic features such as this, since as far as I can tell, stock Android has no visible performance superiority and I never experienced any "sluggishness" or whatever else on my device.