benjipwns
Banned
In like mattresses or big vaults like Scrooge McDuck?The problematic part about the 1% is that they tend to hoard their cash, effectively removing it from the economy.
In like mattresses or big vaults like Scrooge McDuck?The problematic part about the 1% is that they tend to hoard their cash, effectively removing it from the economy.
In like mattresses or big vaults like Scrooge McDuck?
Pretty much every recent president has been ultrarich except arguably Bill Clinton, who is Hillary's husband.So our voting choices are either an ultrarich, out of touch, callous old person or an ultrarich, out of touch, callous old person who is a racist pig. What a dark age for the US.
So why are these pro-TPP people donating to Hillary? Just for fun?Well, my post is about reality. People are in here wondering how people get away with "fooling donors" and the potential benefits of doing so, how to get away with it, etc.
There is no mystery. The law says they are SUPPOSED to ignore donors wishes.
And I know you say "meanwhile in reality" because its easy to say the system is corrupt, but considering these platforms are set in stone (ink, text, video, web) and theres no evidence of quid pro quo, this "reality" youre referring to is literally speculation of corruption and conspiracy. Also good luck changing your platform without anyone noticing when youre getting a million hits a day from NeoGAF~!
You are welcome to give me evidence of favors and policy in exchange for donations though.
Pretty much every recent president has been uktrarich except arguably Bill Clinton, who is Hillary's husband.
It's an unfortunate reality, but I don't see the point of singling out one candidate for schmoozing when it's more of an indictment of the system as a whole. You're not going to win a national election in this country by being a perfect flower, or even (generally) a state election.
Russ Feingold, the author of McCain-Feingold (the campaign finance law crippled by Citizens United) banned outside spending in his 2010 reelection campaign because he was sure he could win just by virtue of every Wisconsinite knowing how decent and honest he was. Guess what didn't happen. And now Feingold is running for his seat again but is open to outside spending.
You wanna change the rules, first you need to win.
Seriously. Some folks here are so pure, they'd rather Dems handicap themselves by tying one hand behind their backs than have a fighting chance against the GOP.
She doesn't need the money, though. You're acting as though this is some close race.Seriously. Some folks here are so pure, they'd rather Dems handicap themselves by tying one hand behind their backs than have a fighting chance against the GOP.
Truman was the best.Every FDR was rich as fuck.
Holy shit, she's back!Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Disgusting. And people actually preferred her over Bernie. USA are doomed by their stupidity
You forget about the downballotShe doesn't need the money, though. You're acting as though this is some close race.
He's the reason for the Presidential pension. (Which Hoover also took so as to not embarrass Harry.)Truman was the best.
He refused to get paid for speeches and appearances after his presidency because he thought it was unbecoming. He did have to move with his in-laws after he left office.
o snapTwo-term presidents may buy health insurance under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; a GSA legal opinion ruled Jimmy Carter and George H. W. Bush ineligible.
Shame he had to be president so he could be a decent ex-president,Richard Nixon relinquished his Secret Service protection in 1985, the only president to do so.
Other Democrats do, and the money raised from these fundraisers goes to them.She doesn't need the money, though. You're acting as though this is some close race.
The Hamptons is full of powerful, wealthy people who are bored and go to constant social events to see who else got invited and to show your status, said Ken Sunshine, a veteran Democratic activist and public relations executive with a home in Remsenburg, N.Y. This year, he added, going to a Clinton event is at the very top of the list.
He's also the reason why we have a chief of staff.He's the reason for the Presidential pension. (Which Hoover also took so as to not embarrass Harry.)
Seriously. Some folks here are so pure, they'd rather Dems handicap themselves by tying one hand behind their backs than have a fighting chance against the GOP.
Agree 100%. It's really bad in neogaf but neogaf is too liberal.
Eh... if it would have saved us from 8 years of Bush I'm trying to think of a crime that I wouldn't have looked the other way from.This is such a dumb criticism. Hey, the Republicans are gerrymandering and disenfranchising voters - we gotta do it too! Come on, keep that skin in the game, win at any cost!
Shitty behavior is shitty regardless of who is doing it. Turning a blind eye to shitty behavior because it benefits you is, like, fundamentally unethical.
Holy shit, she's back!
Just in case people forgot this is the woman who switched support from Hillary to McCain in 2008 on the grounds that Obama was an elitist snob.
...
Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild
No. it's bribes disguised as political donation. What's depressing is all the posters here defending this reprehensible shit as "normal". The standards for a decent politician and human being or in fact for political discussion have dropped like a rock here. I weep for humanity if Clinton's disgusting involvement with the ultra-rich ruling class is considered "normal" nowadays.
corruption:Where did she acquire that title?
Her third husband is Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (born August 29, 1931), who she was introduced to by Henry Kissinger at the 1998 Bilderberg Group conference in Scotland.
On the announcement of the marriage, the Rothschild couple was invited to spend their honeymoon at the White House by the Clintons
Rachel Maddow is on the caseLynn Rothschild is married to a man named EVELYN
why is this not a bigger story
This is such a dumb criticism. Hey, the Republicans are gerrymandering and disenfranchising voters - we gotta do it too! Come on, keep that skin in the game, win at any cost!
Shitty behavior is shitty regardless of who is doing it. Turning a blind eye to shitty behavior because it benefits you is, like, fundamentally unethical.
Aren't private fundraisers a primary part of any and all presidential campaigns? NYT making it seem like Hillary is only interested in dealing with the ultrarich just because Trump is flailing about on network news.
Trump won't need to pivot to be "president of the people" when the New York Times is doing it for him.
That's...normal for a campaign.
How does this compare to for example Bill Clinton's, Bush's and Obama's campaigns? Did they do the same thing? Sounds like pretty standard procedure to raise money.
Not that I really mind. Take the money. Spent it on ads and events in the next few months to try and get as many votes as possible. Meanwhile Trump with his public appearances has embarrassed himself more and more. Why go out while your competitor is already doing the job for you.
Hilarious given who her opponent claims to be.
Meanwhile Joe Biden is eating grits and pounding energy drinks in a truck stop diner.
First 3 of 5 posts. Is this really normal in America? Should we really accept this no matter who is doing it?
I think if it was Trump or a GOPper, this thread would have gone up in flames by now.
If it were anyone but Clinton this article would never even have been written.
I wouldn't say it's normal, as much as I'd say it's necessary. We shouldn't tolerate it, but why single out one politician?First 3 of 5 posts. Is this really normal in America? Should we really accept this no matter who is doing it?
She doesn't need the money, though. You're acting as though this is some close race.
Remember the wall of excuses used to defend Bernie when he did the exact same thing?
I think the term used was non-news?
When did Bernie disappear for this long only to be seen amongst the elite?
When did Bernie disappear for this long only to be seen amongst the elite?
That's...normal for a campaign.
Hillary didn't disappear either. It's hyperbolic.
She's been far less visible and accessible.
Nothing surprising. We know what her priorities are, whether she says otherwise.
Not an American but even skimming this thread...there's literally nothing stopping people having debates and conversations about Clinton? Anyone who has "defended" Hilary has pointed out the system is corrupt, and she's no worse than anyone else, rather than saying she is "innocent" entirely.
Is it not a forum for discussion and debate or just a forum for binary agreement?
Man the Hillary defence force.. Jesus Christ, you just can't criticise her here.