Where Ya Curly Mustaches At?! Marvel vs Capcom 3 Hype Thread of Scoops!

I hope to God they announce it as a Wii exclusive. EvilLore could power the forum servers for a thousand years off the energy generated by the meltdowns.
 
Burai said:
I hope to God they announce it as a Wii exclusive. EvilLore could power the forum servers for a thousand years off the energy generated by the meltdowns.
I hope to Xenu it's multiplatform, so everyone can enjoy the game.
 
Burai said:
I hope to God they announce it as a Wii exclusive. EvilLore could power the forum servers for a thousand years off the energy generated by the meltdowns.

It honestly won't be. :lol
It's all about money, and they'll be losing alot of it, be the case.
 
red shoe paul said:
It honestly won't be. :lol
It's all about money, and they'll be losing alot of it, be the case.

I guess people wouldn't pony up for a new system if it was exclusive, eh? (And I don't mean on the Wii specifically, but any system.) Good thing I have all systems, because I don't have to worry about what system it ends up on...if it's exclusive that is.
 
jett said:
:lol Don't wanna face facts huh. In no universe does TvC look better than SF4, in any way shape or form.

What facts? That you posted the shittiest TVC screen you could find in a Google search? :lol

If i knew nothing about TVC, would that screen be representative of the games visuals?

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090819025135017_640w.jpg

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090723110311905_640w.jpg

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090702115417180_640w.jpg


I guess it wouldnt
 
MYE said:
What facts? That you posted the shittiest TVC screen you could find in a Google search? :lol

If i knew nothing about TVC, would that screen be representative of the games visuals?

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090819025135017_640w.jpg

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090723110311905_640w.jpg

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-ultimate-all-stars-20090702115417180_640w.jpg


I guess it wouldnt

Boy I wonder how is that gonna look when displayed on a screen larger than 13inches.
 
EDarkness said:
I think it's a matter of art direction. I think Street Fighter 4 is pretty ugly in that department. On a technical level, Street Fighter 4 takes the crown, but I think TvC is just a more pleasing aesthetic. Just my opinion, of course.

I was going to say this, but you said it better. Thank you.
 
jett said:
Boy I wonder how is that gonna look when displayed on a screen larger than 13inches.


er i think the argument is more about the style of the graphics? you can't really compare the fidelity of a wii game with a ps360 game. i think TvC would look amazing with ps360 level graphics hardware behind it.
 
RelentlessRolento said:
still surprised nobody really has focused on how great it would be to see these guys:

killer7_rumor_smash.jpg

I'm wondering how this will work:

K7 spoilers
Will it be different playable characters or just one person who changes during moves or supers.
 
MYE said:
wciuz8.jpg

eh, looks better then SF4's butt-ugly monkey characters IMO.
I honestly dont know wtf they where smoking when they came up with that artstyle.

Wii exclusivity happened.

Aww. That's sad. Here try this.

10zy5o5.jpg
 
jett said:
Boy I wonder how is that gonna look when displayed on a screen larger than 13inches.

Looks good.

See, the great thing about actually owning TVC and a 40' Sony Bravia is that you dont have to "wonder" anymore.
 
V_Arnold said:
Well, you still cant count properly :)
Gen, Rose, Sakura, Fei Long, Cammy, Gouken, Seth, Dan -> 8 difference. Not 5, not 7. Even with Seth counting out, it is 7 plus. But whatever.

New characters.

Not characters from past SF games.

Abel, Rufus, Viper, Fuerte, Gouken; and even if he's a shit swiss army boss Seth counts.

But hey, keep on keepin' on like you know what's up, Chuck.
 
This is all kind of a stupid argument because it seems one of you at at least one point was referring to the artstyle and not the technical capabilities of the game, in which case yeah it's not really surprising the 360 is stronger than the Wii.

On an entirely related note, I think the homing attack should not be used in this new sequel agree/disagree?????
 
The Take Out Bandit said:
Even more proof that this is the worst console generation, ever.

Standards have been lowered because of it.

What, that it's not a super high resolution? Cause after a certain point the resolution really makes no difference. The art is done for the resolution it's at, not HD. I can run SF4 on my computer at 1920x1200 and it really doesn't look that different than at 720p. Going into higher resolutions, in this case, won't reveal anymore detail.

But really, who's gonna complain about actually getting TvC stateside? And how is not complaining about that some kind of lowered standard?

Or you could be completely joking.
 
ShockingAlberto said:
This is all kind of a stupid argument because it seems one of you at at least one point was referring to the artstyle and not the technical capabilities of the game, in which case yeah it's not really surprising the 360 is stronger than the Wii.

I guess I wasn't very clear, with that Morrigan shot I was demonstrating that its below SF4 tehcnically and artistically. You may say you prefer the aesthetics of TvC and uh that's all right(although I really really reaaaaally don't see it)... I guess, but not to the point where SF4 is butt ugly compared to it.

tatsunoko-vs-capcom-cross-generation-of-heroes-20080527082746999_640w.jpg


vs

www.totalvideogames.com_67253_ryu_002_bmp_jpgcopy.jpg



I don't have anything against TvC, it's just that there's something slightly annoying when I see people shitting on SF4's looks(which is how this argument started, really) to prop up that. In motion it's even worse for TvC, as the animation in SF4 is really fantastic.

I see people accusing others of wii-hate, but frankly it's the other way around when it comes to SF4, as far as I'm concerned. They just want to believe SF4 looks like dogshit compared to the artistic magnificence that is TvC.


p.s. that morrigan shot is on the second page of google's image search and a good choice if I may so myself as the argument was about how the character looks and that was the only close up shot.
 
FreedomFrisbee said:
What, that it's not a super high resolution? Cause after a certain point the resolution really makes no difference. The art is done for the resolution it's at, not HD. I can run SF4 on my computer at 1920x1200 and it really doesn't look that different than at 720p. Going into higher resolutions, in this case, won't reveal anymore detail.

But really, who's gonna complain about actually getting TvC stateside? And how is not complaining about that some kind of lowered standard?

Or you could be completely joking.

Oof, you're so coming at it from all wrong angles. :lol

SF4 Vs. TvC graphics; which would you rather have?

- Sharp stick in the eye
- Nail gun in the eye

:lol :lol :lol

Only thing I'll agree on is both of these abortions hold up much better on smaller screens. Less than 20" to mask the fugly.
 
Protip: If you have to add the qualifier "for a game on the wii" to your comment about how good the graphics are, it's like saying "He runs fast for...for a guy with one leg."

Poor little tink-tink.
 
Props to the people that prefer the MvC1 backgrounds and music to MvC2 backgrounds and music. You guys cant be any more right with that one.

I would also prefer the game to look more like TvC than SF4. Its just more suiting for a VS game.
 
The Take Out Bandit said:
Oof, you're so coming at it from all wrong angles. :lol

SF4 Vs. TvC graphics; which would you rather have?

- Sharp stick in the eye
- Nail gun in the eye

:lol :lol :lol

Only thing I'll agree on is both of these abortions hold up much better on smaller screens. Less than 20" to mask the fugly.

Oh, yes. I see, I'm not paying attention to the convo.

TvC I have no issue with at all. The only reasonable criticism of it I can see is the resolution. It looks the way it looks because it has to mesh with a bunch of cartoon characters.

SF4 I can see why people might think it looks ugly, but I've got no issue with it.
 
jett said:
I guess I wasn't very clear, with that Morrigan shot I was demonstrating that its below SF4 tehcnically and artistically. You may say you prefer the aesthetics of TvC and uh that's all right(although I really really reaaaaally don't see it)... I guess, but not to the point where SF4 is butt ugly compared to it.

http://oculin.files.wordpress.com/2...neration-of-heroes-20080527082746999_640w.jpg

vs

http://www.totalvideogames.com/img/uploaded/www.totalvideogames.com_67253_ryu_002_bmp_jpgcopy.jpg


I don't have anything against TvC, it's just that there's something slightly annoying when I see people shitting on SF4's looks(which is how this argument started, really) to prop up that. In motion it's even worse for TvC, as the animation in SF4 is really fantastic.

I see people accusing others of wii-hate, but frankly it's the other way around when it comes to SF4, as far as I'm concerned. They just want to believe SF4 looks like dogshit compared to the artistic magnificence that is TvC.


p.s. that morrigan shot is on the second page of google's image search and a good choice if I may so myself as the argument was about how the character looks and that was the only close up shot.

Why on earth would i want SF4 to look like dogshit?

Seriously. What sane reason is there to want a game i might be interested in to look like dogshit?

And those Ryu screens just solidify my opinion regarding SF4's ugly artstyle.
Yes, i still think TVC looks alot better artistically
 
jett said:
I guess I wasn't very clear, with that Morrigan shot I was demonstrating that its below SF4 tehcnically and artistically. You may say you prefer the aesthetics of TvC and uh that's all right(although I really really reaaaaally don't see it)... I guess, but not to the point where SF4 is butt ugly compared to it.

<image snipped>

vs
<image snipped>


I don't have anything against TvC, it's just that there's something slightly annoying when I see people shitting on SF4's looks(which is how this argument started, really) to prop up that. In motion it's even worse for TvC, as the animation in SF4 is really fantastic.

I see people accusing others of wii-hate, but frankly it's the other way around when it comes to SF4, as far as I'm concerned. They just want to believe SF4 looks like dogshit compared to the artistic magnificence that is TvC.


p.s. that morrigan shot is on the second page of google's image search and a good choice if I may so myself as the argument was about how the character looks and that was the only close up shot.

You're arguing about something that is totally subjective in the first place, and there simply can't be a winner in this argument. For me it's not even a matter of what system it's on, but I just like the look of TvC over Street Fighter 4. You don't think so? Great. I don't think Street Fighter 4 looks like "dogshit" however. But when I'm playing both games, I do find the look of TvC more appealing to me. Again, my opinion.

I'll buy MvC 3 regardless of whatever visual style they go with, but I'd much prefer the TvC one to the Street Fighter 4 one.
 
ITT people base the TvC via screenshots and not in motion. That's why TvC artistically works - because they actually look like sprites and everything is always in motion.
 
Ookami-kun said:
ITT people base the TvC via screenshots and not in motion. That's why TvC artistically works - because they actually look like sprites and everything is always in motion.

I've played TvC and still think it looks pretty shitty. No way does it actually look like sprites.

But, again, Zero will make me forgive a lot of flaws.
 
woodypop said:
This thread has gotten all sorts of stupid.

(Oh, and here's hoping Donovan somehow makes it into MvC3.)
This is what happens when Gaf is left to its own devices with no trailers or anything to talk about.

Please release something soon Capcom. End this madness.
 
Skilletor said:
I've played TvC and still think it looks pretty shitty. No way does it actually look like sprites.

But, again, Zero will make me forgive a lot of flaws.

They both suck, I want them to look like that Naruto game in the PS3... wait let me google...

YAY FOUND A GIF!

2jcwqvb.gif


Now that shit looks awesome! Ignoring the fact that is base in an anime.
 
woodypop said:
This thread has gotten all sorts of stupid.

(Oh, and here's hoping Donovan somehow makes it into MvC3.)

Of course, the "oh god, SFIV is horrible!" Squadron has arrived. Broken record.
 
Ok.

When people are saying that they prefer the artstyle in TvC over 4 I believe they are referring to the character art, which I agree with.

27zkacm.jpg
vs
9qe9hy.jpg



Technically speaking nothing TvC does ingame is better than IV. The facial expressions and animations aren't even close, and this just isn't because it's on more powerful hardware; SFIV has arguably the best animations of any fighter to date.

TvC vs SFIV
SFIV vs 3rd Strike

what fucking difference does it matter? TvC plays fucking awesome (I will defend this to the death, bash the graphics all you want but you can't say it is a very good fighting game), SFIV plays better than 3rd Strike (IMO). That's what counts, not crap like "HURRR RYU LOOKS LIKE A GORILLA IN SFIV" or "HURR ONLY 200 POLYS ON MORRIGAN IN TVC LOL"

cut that shit out already.

_dementia said:
what happened to your avatar?
it's next gen now :D
 
-DarKaoZ- said:
Now that shit looks awesome! Ignoring the fact that is base in an anime.

Isn't there some sort of "Law of reversal", where if it's an action anime its game would be good?
 
I just want some info for this game so we can stop this TvC, SF4 looks like shit/great crap and move on.

Oh who am I kidding this is GAF
 
Top Bottom