Monique Judge writes for the Root on the usual "you're the real racist for talking about racism" and how this can lead to violence and pushback to the point of self-harm:
http://www.theroot.com/white-fragility-leads-to-white-violence-why-conversati-1791233086
This is something that is more and more evident with the way that discussions about sensitive issues related to race (and gender and sexuality and other identity politics topics) are received by the dominant group (white men) where they feel attacked and persecuted just for talking about oppression. It is perhaps nothing new and even expected that if someone speaks about how they are oppressed or feel uncomfortable, they are met with hostility and fear and anger by the dominant group in question - i.e. something caused by white fragility. This is not only just right-winged racist people. Many well-meaning white moderates and so-called leftists are so bothered by merely the conversation about race that they in turn reprimand/punish the person who speaks up about it.
In turn, this fragility leads to actions by dominant groups to punish minorities, even if this hurts members of the dominant group in the process. You saw in the aftermath of Trump winning the election where a lot of people were like "that's what you get for calling people racist/sexist/homophonic/etc.". I.e. that by addressing society's implicit oppression of marginalized groups and how this is manifested in voting for fascists like Trump that effectively punishes anyone who isn't part of the top group in society.
This is also what Van Jones called 'whitelash', which referred to how rectifying racial injustices potentially leads to a backlash by the dominant white group, thereby following the moniker "when you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
And we saw this with Brexit where the hostility towards immigration lead to a country willing to tank their own economy and empower a party that finds EU Human Rights bothersome and willingly vote for a policy that an obvious racist party (UKIP) endorses.
And we saw this as well with the Vox ACA video where someone who was saved from breast cancer thanks to Obamacare voted for someone who's explicit promise was to repeal the ACA and empower a party that is willing to let millions of people die.
Anyway, I guess my point is just so crazy the lengths that white people or dominant groups are willing to go to even to the point of self-harm, just to remain in a position where they can dominate other groups or rebuild a "safe white space" where their position can remain unquestioned and implicit. Just the mere fact of talking about it makes people dig in their heels and even go to great lengths to justify why they simply had to vote for a racist politician and condemn the entire world, because the conversation and pushback made them feel uncomfortable.
These two incidents and the many others I witness on Twitter every single day lead me to conclude that the reason conversations about race with white people fail is that white fragility leads to white violence, and not even other white people are immune to it.
”What is important to remember about white fragility and white discomfort is that when white people are scared, people die," Ciccariello-Maher said. He cited the example of Jordan Davis, who dared to sit in a car with music loudly playing as a white man was present.
The oft-uttered ”Not all white people" is a form of white violence. It is a silencing move that, as Ciccariello-Maher says, displaces the conversation. It says, ”Yeah, you've had that experience, but since all white people don't do that, it doesn't count."
When a black person offers a polite critique of something a white person has done, and said white person calls the critique an ”attack" or says the black person is being ”racist," that, too, is a form of white violence, used to deflect and derail. The person it is used against will often have to abandon his or her first point in order to defend him- or herself against the accusations of attacking and racism. As Ciccariello-Maher asked, ”Why are you so invested in whiteness that when you see something said about white people, you take that personally?"
On Wednesday a police officer in Smyrna, Ga., reportedly purchased doughnuts at a local Krispy Kreme location, and when he received his order, one of the boxes had ”Black Lives Matter" written on it in black Sharpie. The officer reported the incident, the Smyrna Police Department called it ”egregious," and now law enforcement and the Krispy Kreme corporation are ”investigating" the incident.
Pro-police blog Blue Lives Matter posted about the box and condemned both the action and the Black Lives Matter movement, saying, ”For those who are not aware, this is extremely disrespectful to law enforcement."
While writing the message on the box may not have been the best decision Krispy Kreme's employee made that day, why is that particular critique considered an attack on law enforcement and, ultimately, whiteness?
”It's only considered that in the context where people consider black rights and black equality as an attack on whiteness," Ciccariello-Maher said to me.
”It's because [white people] think they are victims in a country where they have never been victims," he said. ”I think there's a deep-seated guilt in white America. The resentful insistence that white people in contemporary America have nothing to feel guilty about. Contemporary structures of white supremacy remain from which people draw a series of benefits. White people deny these things, and yet know that they are true."
http://www.theroot.com/white-fragility-leads-to-white-violence-why-conversati-1791233086
This is something that is more and more evident with the way that discussions about sensitive issues related to race (and gender and sexuality and other identity politics topics) are received by the dominant group (white men) where they feel attacked and persecuted just for talking about oppression. It is perhaps nothing new and even expected that if someone speaks about how they are oppressed or feel uncomfortable, they are met with hostility and fear and anger by the dominant group in question - i.e. something caused by white fragility. This is not only just right-winged racist people. Many well-meaning white moderates and so-called leftists are so bothered by merely the conversation about race that they in turn reprimand/punish the person who speaks up about it.
In turn, this fragility leads to actions by dominant groups to punish minorities, even if this hurts members of the dominant group in the process. You saw in the aftermath of Trump winning the election where a lot of people were like "that's what you get for calling people racist/sexist/homophonic/etc.". I.e. that by addressing society's implicit oppression of marginalized groups and how this is manifested in voting for fascists like Trump that effectively punishes anyone who isn't part of the top group in society.
This is also what Van Jones called 'whitelash', which referred to how rectifying racial injustices potentially leads to a backlash by the dominant white group, thereby following the moniker "when you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
And we saw this with Brexit where the hostility towards immigration lead to a country willing to tank their own economy and empower a party that finds EU Human Rights bothersome and willingly vote for a policy that an obvious racist party (UKIP) endorses.
And we saw this as well with the Vox ACA video where someone who was saved from breast cancer thanks to Obamacare voted for someone who's explicit promise was to repeal the ACA and empower a party that is willing to let millions of people die.
Anyway, I guess my point is just so crazy the lengths that white people or dominant groups are willing to go to even to the point of self-harm, just to remain in a position where they can dominate other groups or rebuild a "safe white space" where their position can remain unquestioned and implicit. Just the mere fact of talking about it makes people dig in their heels and even go to great lengths to justify why they simply had to vote for a racist politician and condemn the entire world, because the conversation and pushback made them feel uncomfortable.