High school valedictorians are the most awful parts of a graduation ceremony, most of the time it just reinforces economic/social privilege while not recognizing and honoring students who struggled early in their schooling but managed to greatly improve over the years. My high school got rid of valedictorians due to lawsuits like this one, albeit not over issues of race, a couple years before I came in and it was replaced with an honor society for the 5% percent of seniors with the highest cumulative gpa , no other criteria. This was super competitive and basically required straight A's and lots of APs which effectively shut out many poorer students who were exceptional in their own right, but unable to justify the extra cost and effort of taking the APs. I am sure that there are cases where valedictorian awards are not quite so regressive, but for the most part they reward students who coasted through high school while ignoring more deserving, albeit lower GPA students, who rose from lower beginnings.
Also fuck Cum, Summa, and Magna Cum Laude awards as well, because they operate on the same idea of rewarding students that were consistently strong students throughout their career while not recognizing how those who struggled at first or dealt with personal tragedy managed to overcome and succeed despite that. While I recognize that they did great work, it felt awful that we gave the Magna Cum Laude students an extra-long standing ovation at my college graduation, when knowing that so many other students had just as much of a challenge to overcome, if not more. These honors focus on the destination over the journey and trivialize the process of learning and growing as a person, as if the merit of their education could be determined by grades alone.
Hopefully she goes on to have a successful college career and can move forward with her life in spite of this grossness.