User 100115
Banned
Mumei. Articulate and handsome
This. Also Stump and Opiate. Though now it sounds like I am sucking up to mods.

Mumei. Articulate and handsome
There was another mod whose username began with a C and my brain is completely blanking on him right now, he as well had very interesting posts that were very eloquent.
Also, how well would the opposite of this thread go over?
Some of them can also come off as extremely condescending, but eloquent nonetheless.
I worry that the opposite of this kind of thread would violate one of the general GAF regulations: don't be an outright asshole to fellow GAF members. It might be inviting people to give in to negative emotion if actually asked to list everyone they don't like or think posts badly.
I'd guess that some think threads such as this are just circle jerks. But I'm not sure how to balance it with the opposite without asking for trouble.
Honestly it can be kind of difficult to avoid coming across as condescending on the internet if you're trying to write in a confident, direct tone. That's been my experience.
If something I write seems condescending, then all due apologies - aside from internet tonal problems, I'll be the first to say frustration with trying to get to the heart of a topic plays into it at times.
Derrick91, or whatever the guy with the Dues Ex avatar.
Why? Because he's always arguing about anything and hates almost every game on the planet.
Honestly it can be kind of difficult to avoid coming across as condescending on the internet if you're trying to write in a confident, direct tone. That's been my experience.
If something I write seems condescending, then all due apologies - aside from internet tonal problems, I'll be the first to say frustration with trying to get to the heart of a topic plays into it at times.
Are you thinking of charlequin or Cyan?
SteveYoungBlood is the only one that really deserves the kudos, imo. I feel his moderate posts often get ignored for not being grandstanding, assholish or extremist like some of the other people you might nominate.
Some people who get nominated in these kind of threads probably get paranoid to put on their best behavior for every post they do. Delete loads of not-Oscar worthy posts.
I don't envy them.
SteveYoungBlood is the only one that really deserves the kudos, imo. I feel his moderate posts often get ignored for not being grandstanding, assholish or extremist like some of the other people you might nominate.
Though I fundementally disagree with his worldview, I think OttomanScribe expresses himself well.
Plus most of the others already mentioned.
Funnily enough I was honestly coming in here to post your name. I promise it isn't a follow back thing.
So yeah, Sutton Dagger. Also a fan of Meus, SmokyDave and Zaptruder... also Stump and ThoseDeafMutes amongst many others.
Smokeydave is surprisingly eloquent. His posts often come across as uncouth and a bit 'loud' but you can tell there is thinking and structure behind it. I bet he's dead posh![]()
Funnily enough I was honestly coming in here to post your name. I promise it isn't a follow back thing.
So yeah, Sutton Dagger. Also a fan of Meus, SmokyDave and Zaptruder... also Stump and ThoseDeafMutes amongst many others.
You mean that if someone asks me why a game is terrible that I can provide a detailed and harsh explanation why?
Hmm...I'll take it!
Empty Vessel is definitely one of my favorites.
Did I really just see derrick01 mentioned in a thread about eloquent posting? I must have the wrong tab open...
Stumpokapow
Comes in a thread and drops truth bombs with reliable accuracy.
Yeah man, stump is awesome. What's your beef with him?Hahaha...
Seriously though...seriously? =p
Monocle. Search database errored out when I went searching for a few sample posts, but he often elevates discussion in threads by saying what would like to say, if only I were half as articulate and able to organize my thoughts as clearly as he.
It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to give praise of being "articulate" to someone who does it purposely in a condescending manner, lecturing people on subjects using nothing but the most basic of information in order to give third party observers the impression that the person isn't already informed on the subject matter, even though the person never said anything to indicate lack of knowledge, but only simply disagreed with the person who is currently getting praise for being "articulate."
It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to give praise of being "articulate" to someone who does it purposely in a condescending manner, lecturing people on subjects using nothing but the most basic of information in order to give third party observers the impression that the person isn't already informed on the subject matter, even though the person never said anything to indicate lack of knowledge, but only simply disagreed with the person who is currently getting praise for being "articulate."