Why I'm Making My Husband Miss The Super Bowl

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stacey-tavor-merwin/post_2940_b_1254523.html

On Sunday, as fans of football and fans of commercials gather round the TV, my husband will be sitting with me at a devastatingly romantic restaurant. Our reservation is at 8pm, smack-dab in the middle of the game, and admittedly, this was not his first choice of plans. But before you judge me as a demanding, insensitive wife, I should explain: It's our anniversary. Our first anniversary.

We knew last year this would be an issue. When we were deciding on wedding date, I suggested February 5 because it wasn't going to be a busy traveling weekend and we both agreed that we wanted a winter wedding. (It would be in Houston, and a sweaty bride in a white dress taking pictures outdoors was not an option.) My husband's immediate response to this date: "But wait, Babe, the next day is the Super Bowl. We need to think about this." Josh has been a freelance photographer for Sports Illustrated and ESPN the Magazine and has actually been on the field for a Super Bowl, so I understood that this was a big deal for him. And yet I wasn't going to let a football game -- even the football game -- get in the way. We went ahead with that plan, he watched the game at my parents' house the next day and life was (and is) beautiful.

This year, as the season went along, I started to realize that Super Bowl might actually continue to be a threat. Not only would it be the same weekend this year, it would be the same day. Josh is a huge Houston Texans fan, so when they made the playoffs for the first time, I decided to be the Cool Newlywed Wife and make a deal with him: If his team made it to the Super Bowl, we could celebrate the day before. I hate to admit this, but I then secretly rooted for the other team -- the team whose name I couldn't tell you but that (thank goodness) -- ultimately won.

Before you start throwing rotten tomatoes, know that I make my fair share of sacrifices for my husband. Every weekday, I get up before 6:30 am to take the dog out because Josh has trouble sleeping. Plus, he gets back/foot rubs almost any time he because I know that his photo work is very physical and requires lots of strength.

I understand that this is just our first anniversary and there will be many more, but to me, this is a milestone worth celebrating. Just ask Kim Kardashian. Josh and I both agree that marriage is about compromise and wanting to make each other happy. (Gwyneth Paltrow agrees too, as we learned this week.) In Josh's ideal world, we would watch the game while enjoying pizza and beer with our buddies. In mine, we would watch no football and do what many women apparently would prefer to do on Super Bowl Sunday. But he wanted me to be happy so he agreed to our dinner reservation. And I wanted to make him happy so I agreed to get to the restaurant early and watch the game for 90 minutes at the bar. Besides, the black leather dress I plan on wearing Sunday night trumps Giants uniform spandex any day of the week.

Umm...what do you guys think about this? I don't understand why she didn't just pick a different day.
 
Umm...what do you guys think about this? I don't understand why she didn't just pick a different day.

Sports, serious business.

In fact, so serious that if you miss watching something on the tv due to having an anniversary dinner with you wife - it's a big enough occasion to write an article about.
 
It seems like it's not just a fun activity for him, but part of his way of life - even his job, really. It seems rather absurd to not just move the anniversary dinner to the night before the superbowl or some shit.

If he agrees, that's cool, but from the way she's defending herself in the article and saying "I knew this would be a problem", I am curious as to whether or not he actually is going along completely all smiles.
 
It's their wedding anniversary. If the dude's team isn't in the game, then I personally think he's an ass for putting up any kind of fight.
 
He knew what he was getting into. I don't think it's her fault for wanting to celebrate her anniversary on her anniversary....though letting him off the hook and having dinner on Saturday night probably would have been a great anniversary gift for him. Better than a blow job.
 
To me, just doing the anniversary stuff a day earlier would be fine.

My g/f has a ton of tests and assignments due around Valentine's day and the next day. "How bout we have the dinner on a later day" I ask. Nope, we HAVE to have dinner on Valentines. Doesn't matter if she's overloaded with work, or that celebrating on another day would be way easier.
 
Her argument makes sense to a degree certainly, but some of the things she says in there make her sound very unlikeable. Add in the fact that he's a sports photographer and it gets a little worse. It's like she can't even comprehend his side. Her "sacrifices" are pretty funny too. Welcome to life.
 
He's gonna regret that wedding date every few years for the rest of his life.
KuGsj.gif


I'm going ice skating instead of watching the game.
 
I'm sorry but she sounds way to aware of what the initial date meant and all the things that come with it. Sounds like she wanted to keep her husband in check. Dudes a dummy for giving in on the initial date 'cause this is definitely going to be an issue for the rest of the marriage.
 
I honestly have no problem with that. It's their wedding, and both agreed to the date beforehand.

It's not his team, and it seems he doesn't work that game so he can just catch the highlights. He'd probably see more footage of people playing football that way too.
 
If it was any team but my team in the game, I'd gladly miss the Super Bowl to spend time with my wife on our first anniversary. Even if it was my team I'd seriously consider it, giving that it's your first anniversary.
 
She's making her sacrifices sound more important than his and trying to justify it by impeding something important to him. The anniversary is important, yes, but it can be celebrated before/after the game and niether party has to lose anything in the process.
 
Also, sports threads in OT just never work. GAF just doesn't get it. Sometime we should do a poll of the people who have actually played in some competitive sport at some point in their lives.
 
Either the husband should realize that the superbowl is not all that important, that his wife far outweighs anything he could get from the superbowl.
Or the wife can realize that they can go out the day BEFORE the anniversary and celebrate just as well, maybe as a gesture to show that she understands how much her husband loves his fooseball and is willing to compromise.
 
Josh is a huge Houston Texans fan, so when they made the playoffs for the first time, I decided to be the Cool Newlywed Wife and make a deal with him: If his team made it to the Super Bowl, we could celebrate the day before.
Is she really saying that if the Texans made the Super Bowl, he still wouldn't be able to watch the game but could "celebrate" the day before? So, a Super Bowl party not on Super Bowl Sunday? Christ.

Ugh, DERP, I get it now. The game tonight has me all fucked up... I probably shouldn't even try posting anything else today.
 
Why are some people so hardlined on celebrating on the actual day? Most of the celebrations for my wife and my anniversaries and birthdays and most other things come a few days before or after because of shitty work schedules we can rarely get out of. I mean really what's so horrible about celebrating their anniversary with a nice dinner the day after or before? That way she gets a nice dinner and celebration and he'll get to see the game. It's win/win.
 
I would certainly skip the super bowl for my first wedding anniversary especially one as dull as this matchup. I do get the feeling he's never going to watch a super bowl in peace from here on out. She sounds really threatened by it.
 
just a bullshit petty test she is putting him through. i would have a knock-down drag-out fight with my gf if she tried to pull something like this.
 
I wouldn't be too upset about missing the Super Bowl (Jesus it's just a game), but I would be a little upset about my wife be so overly sentimental that celebrating the anniversary the day of! takes on such importance. I would think that celebrating it period would be the important thing, not what particular day.
 
Is she really saying that if the Texans made the Super Bowl, he still wouldn't be able to watch the game but could "celebrate" the day before? So, a Super Bowl party not on Super Bowl Sunday? Christ.

She means they would celebrate the anniversary the day before.
 
It seems like it's not just a fun activity for him, but part of his way of life - even his job, really. It seems rather absurd to not just move the anniversary dinner to the night before the superbowl or some shit.

If he agrees, that's cool, but from the way she's defending herself in the article and saying "I knew this would be a problem", I am curious as to whether or not he actually is going along completely all smiles.

It doesn't seem like he is goes to every Super Bowl. I think she was saying that he has been to Super Bowls before and it means a lot to him if he watched the game, because of his job.

You shouldn't let your job interfere takeover your private life. It is just a freaking game.
 
Also, sports threads in OT just never work. GAF just doesn't get it. Sometime we should do a poll of the people who have actually played in some competitive sport at some point in their lives.

Are you one of those people that think reporters, commentators, etc... can't criticize a player or team if they never played the sport?
 
Is she really saying that if the Texans made the Super Bowl, he still wouldn't be able to watch the game but could "celebrate" the day before? So, a Super Bowl party not on Super Bowl Sunday? Christ.

Your reading comprehension is terrible.

Edit: though her writing sucks too.
 
Is she really saying that if the Texans made the Super Bowl, he still wouldn't be able to watch the game but could "celebrate" the day before? So, a Super Bowl party not on Super Bowl Sunday? Christ.

she meant celebrate their anniversary, not the Super Bowl.
 
An arbitrary date is as lame as a football game.

The celebration can be moved without losing its meaning... the game, not so much.
 
Is she really saying that if the Texans made the Super Bowl, he still wouldn't be able to watch the game but could "celebrate" the day before? So, a Super Bowl party not on Super Bowl Sunday? Christ.

i think she means they'd go to dinner the day before.
 
I understand that this is just our first anniversary and there will be many more, but to me, this is a milestone worth celebrating. Just ask Kim Kardashian. Josh and I both agree that marriage is about compromise and wanting to make each other happy. (Gwyneth Paltrow agrees too, as we learned this week.) In Josh's ideal world, we would watch the game while enjoying pizza and beer with our buddies. In mine, we would watch no football and do what many women apparently would prefer to do on Super Bowl Sunday. But he wanted me to be happy so he agreed to our dinner reservation. And I wanted to make him happy so I agreed to get to the restaurant early and watch the game for 90 minutes at the bar. Besides, the black leather dress I plan on wearing Sunday night trumps Giants uniform spandex any day of the week.
Sounds like an amicable compromise to me.
 
I have to work tonight, I get to watch it on my phone...

...At least he's gonna get dinner and hopefully some sex
 
She's making her sacrifices sound more important than his and trying to justify it by impeding something important to him. The anniversary is important, yes, but it can be celebrated before/after the game and niether party has to lose anything in the process.

what would his sacrifices be? DVR the game and watch it Monday night? OMG.

My GF would never pull anything like this. Like someone said earlier, we celebrate dates pretty much when they fit in.

but some girls are different and if I loved her I would give a big middle finger to a fucking football game.
 
Are you one of those people that think reporters, commentators, etc... can't criticize a player or team if they never played the sport?

I think they are certainly less qualified, and are generally worse at it if that's what you're getting at. There are certainly those who do it well, but they are far from the norm. Typically players/coaches are just better analysts. You wouldn't let someone who never operated machinery train factory workers unless you had a good reason to think they could. That's typically how I approach commentators.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom