• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why was Spencer pushed?

It is also (unlikely) possible he is really retiring, could also be for health reasons. The guy worked there for 35 years, his net worth is in tens of millions of dollars.

Bond not leaving a farewell message might mean she was really fired without notice, which would be strange for such a high profile executive.

Sarah did leave one. I posted it in the other thread.

Both of them leaving at the same time raises eyebrows is all I'm saying. I think Phil was given a choice, and he chose to retire with his $25+mil net worth.
 
Give him credit for the positives and Apparently it's never his responsibility when the outcome is a negative one.

Don
Terry Myerson
Satya
Amy
The tools
Wait till next E3 etc

Fuck off
 
Last edited:
Could have something to do with Phil convinced Microsoft to spend $100 Billion dollars on studios and has very little to show for it?!

Microsoft investors are asking Wendy of they could have instead put that money into AI or Drone technology?!
 
If you want a more complex answer:

Microsoft as a whole makes far higher profit margins than gaming industry, Xbox existence came down to Ed Fries et others convincing Bill Gates that Sony was taking over the PC Gaming space and therefore, the PC space itself, which was a major threat to Windows, and PC gaming suffered in the 00s with plenty of studios dropping their commitment to it and go for Playstation, Xbox and Nintendo instead.

Fast forward, PC gaming is in full force, Sony is porting their games to the platform, the budget costs are so huge that developers make multiplatform as a priority since porting is a dot in the budget sheet, Microsoft probably see this as evidences that they will never be threatened in their core business and Xbox can exist as a profitable per unit niche than a slim margin popular brand (think like automakers, they have been killing cheap cars for SUVs for this reason).
 
I think he was fired as was Sarah Bond. I don't know the reason but if I was to guess it would be:

Satya Nadella has for the last 2 years made some big impositions on the Xbox arm of the company forcing AI and profit margins. I believe Phil and Sarah went along with these probably pushing back a bit but being corporate citizens ultimately did what they were told.

This essentially has destroyed the Xbox brand and caused caused investor questions, Xbox was never a jewel in the crown but had some growth and had stabilized during COVID. Now it's struggling and much worse after Satya's interference.

Unfortunately, Satya never takes responsibility for his screw ups (of which there have been many under his tenure), this is hence an effort to shut down criticism; so he fired Phil and Sarah( giving them payouts to shut them up and take tHe fall).

Sarah will be taken care of financially, and I suspect Phil just said F&@k it after getting a big goodbye check and looking at the value of his stock.
We will unfortunately never know what happened from those two key players
 
There's some opinions on Reddit that Spencer and Bond were both given the push because they refused to get aboard Microsoft's AI train.
 
Great how many titles of threads on here take pure speculation and then present it as settled fact. Nobody knows whether Spencer left of his own volition or was pushed to leave.
 
I think he made a lot of mistakes. He made very big mistakes, like moving Gamepass away from Xbox Series S and exclusive games, and even releasing games on platforms he considered competitors.
 
Nearly every endeavor of Phil's was a failure. Then he decided to push for a $70B buyout of ABK in hopes of propping up his failure of gamepass. It ultimately brought the attention of the shareholders to the xbox moneypit.
 
Pretty much everything that could have gone wrong went wrong.

1. He could not manage studios. He didn't have hard deadlines and always threw money at every problem.
2. He pitched Gamepass as the Netflix of gaming. He pitched this idea when subscriptions were cheap and exploding. Once it existed, subscriptions had started to saturate the market. The model had passed its peak, but was far from unviable. Gamepass devalued games and created a race to the bottom. With rising develepment costs, corners would need to be cut to provide content. He also failed to understand that gaming habits are FAR different than content consumption habits. When it was less than $10 a month, it had value even if you didn't play many games.
3. He was FAR too interested in winning PR battles and continued the MS culture of FUD. S SneakersSO has pointed this out too. He fostered an online community, but didn't foster actual progress
4. The $70 billion dollar blunder came at a time when Call of Duty had passed its peak (but still a money maker)

The good I will give him.
1. Xbox Series X was and is a legit GREAT console.
2. Backwards compatibility was a good win.
 
Last edited:
From the outside looking in, whatever you think of Phil's moves the last decade or so it doesn't seem like he was really on-board with the A.I centric way Microsoft was going when it came to gaming. Sarah was probably in the same vein and that's why she's gone, because it seemed like she was the one who was being positioned to succeed Phil.

When you look at the resume of who's been promoted, it's the perfect stooge for Nadella to throw into the lion's den to push their bullshit.

Anyways, between 2001 and 2013 I was a bigger fan of Xbox than I was either Playstation or Nintendo ( I had all the systems, but I heavily leaned Xbox). They've completely lost me with what they've become ( and really, the other two companies are losing me too for other reasons, but I digress).
 
He was the figure head and he had a bad popular presence now and Xbox is clearly shifting to a new lesser role. This new young lady probably cost less than half of Spencer's salary.

But don't think for sec it was a last min thing. Bond might had been out of the loop but all signs a year ago pointed to Spencer leaving.


He has made multi millions. Don't worry about Old Spence.
 
His networth is probably up in six figures, counting in Swedish currency, so he'll likely be able to retire to a very comfortable life.
 
I don't buy the retiring excuse. Phil is 58, guess who is also 58 and not retiring?



9SePdjS3aUhGlmBN.jpg
 
The real question I've always argued everywhere on the internet, and probably even asked here when I first showed up, was: "How does this guy keep his job while sitting on a pile of failures and negative margins?"

Now I'm starting to ask the same thing about Hermen Hulst. He's still lucky first party is profitable because he's riding on work put on the rails by people like Yoshida, but he's another guy who clearly doesn't belong there, with failures starting to pile up at his feet.
 
Probably because Xbox hardware's retreat to being basically a bolt-on to custom PC's has coincided with the AI boom driving the price of memory and storage into the stratosphere. So their already expensive offer is going to be significantly more expensive then planned.

Its the actual worst-case scenario.
 
I get that he is retiring. But in a normal scenario, he stays on for a few months especially in the 25th anniversary of Xbox.
From what I understand he is staying on in an advisory role to help transition Sharma. He will be officially gone sometime in the Summer. (According to Matty).
 
Last edited:
I don't buy the retiring excuse. Phil is 58, guess who is also 58 and not retiring?



9SePdjS3aUhGlmBN.jpg
The difference is Nadella is the guy who puts the pressure on others to perform within Microsoft. Nadella is only pressured by the shareholders, thus shit roles downhill.
 
Last edited:
Phil gambled on a future where no gamer would own any games and every gamer on the planet would give him 10 bucks a month in exchange for a plethora of games.

What Phil underestimated was that a good percentage of gamers were still collectors at heart. They still like to feel they own their games, even digitally. Also the GamePass mentality is the Fast Food of gaming. Play something for two hours, get your fix, drop the game, pick another one, play 2-3 hours, rinse and repeat. Which caused MicroSoft to value quantity over quality. Which is again - opposed to core gamer values.

My biggest problem with Game Pass was and is my problem with Netflix: Third party 'products' are temporarily available and can be taken down at any time, which forces me to game on Game Pass' time, not mine.

And that's a 'hell naw' from me.
 
Anyone who
No it's not. Provide the evidence he was clearly fired. Else all you are doing is speculating.
Yeah, it is clear to most people.

Is it possible he retired and his successor in the wings chose to resign for shits and giggles on the same day AI was promoted, sure? Lots of things are possible. Doesn't mean we should ignore common sense, the long string of failures, the recent quarterly reports, the other long string of failures, or the rest of the failures.
 
I don't buy the retiring excuse. Phil is 58, guess who is also 58 and not retiring?



9SePdjS3aUhGlmBN.jpg

Strange comparison. People take retirement at different ages and for different reasons.

Nadella has overseen a roughly 1000% increase in Microsoft's stock value since he took over, by the way.
 
Anyone who

Yeah, it is clear to most people.

Is it possible he retired and his successor in the wings chose to resign for shits and giggles on the same day AI was promoted, sure? Lots of things are possible. Doesn't mean we should ignore common sense, the long string of failures, the recent quarterly reports, the other long string of failures, or the rest of the failures.

You're still just speculating.
 
As are you. At least my speculation doesn't require me to trust the same common sense defying spin they've been throwing out every December for 13 years.

Nowhere have I said "this is what happened" or the like. So, no. The factual statement is that we don't know what has happened here or why.

This thread is 99% posters thinking thoughts and then acting like their own thoughts are confirmed facts.
 
Anyone who

Yeah, it is clear to most people.

Is it possible he retired and his successor in the wings chose to resign for shits and giggles on the same day AI was promoted, sure? Lots of things are possible. Doesn't mean we should ignore common sense, the long string of failures, the recent quarterly reports, the other long string of failures, or the rest of the failures.
You could have just said you have no evidence and left it at that. It's probable he was pushed out yes; but again just speculation.
 
Yeah, because Nadella is really going to tell the whole world in an email that Spencer was doing a bad job. This is how executives are shown the door in the real world. Wake up. They thank the person leaving and move on.
They also (usually for top execs) give them the option to either

1. Leave/retire of their "own accord"
Or
2. Be publicly Fired

Most will almost always choose option 1.
 
Phil gambled on a future where no gamer would own any games and every gamer on the planet would give him 10 bucks a month in exchange for a plethora of games.

If anything, GAAS is what killed Gamepass.

I'd say XBox is going "All in" on AI at the demand of Satya. Maybe Phil didn't want to be the hatchet man for the kind of layoffs that are coming. I'm not really sure MS is capable of building AI tools to wipe out the need for most artists and voice talent, but I guess we are going to find out.
 
Last edited:
People "retire" for many personal reasons, especially for people with higher corpo positions like Phil had.

And Xbox's overall profit and revenue went up during Phil's tenure from 2014 - 2023 and his gamepass strategy yielded net profit for MS. They recently raked in $4 billion just from Xbox division alone in 2025, according to Bloomberg.

It's MS's unreasonable profit goals and margins that caused restructure of Xbox division. GaaS barely had anything to do with Microsoft's decision in the board room (probably not even mentioned in their decision making).

I blame the entire industry's shift to AI slop. They are focusing less on hardware and going in all on AI, hence the restructure.
 
Last edited:
Age , he has enought money to live the dream but Age is limited I would do the same , retiring to use the time on My personal goals
 
Last edited:
They also (usually for top execs) give them the option to either

1. Leave/retire of their "own accord"
Or
2. Be publicly Fired

Most will almost always choose option 1.
I do not know Phil's situation and what deals were made but I do have an anecdotal example. Several years ago, I walked an executive out of the building that had "retired." He even stayed on for six months as a consultant after this. Since I had a good relationship with him, he was pretty forthcoming with me about what had happened and he was absolutely pissed that they announced his "retirement" in an internal communication. Over the years, I have seen several examples of early retirement for executive and upper management. It seems common for it to happen when a project is completed or if things are moving in a new direction.
 
Two scenarios:

1. Layoffs were due; Phil couldn't take them anymore. No because he cares about people but because his image was garbage.

2.MS is done with this BS. Nothing is working and there is not an upward trajectory after the ABK acquisition.

And this was the vibe.... the next round of layoffs were going to break something. And they brake it good
 
Phil looks like he aged 20 years this gen. He put all his eggs in one basket with Gamepass and it didn't work. He cancelled games, shut down studios and gave no incentive to buy Xbox hardware or games. He literally ruined the brand and any chance they may have had of being competitive. He was most definitely pushed out the door due to his terrible leadership and devaluing of the Xbox brand. The most embarrassing thing ever was watching Xbox put their legacy franchises on the PS5 while getting nothing in return in terms of Sony games. That showed how desperate and defeated they had become with clueless Phil at the helm. Good riddance and let's see what happens with the new leadership although I won't hold my breath.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft purchased Zenimax and it failed to hit the sales expectations built into the valuation; Refdfall, Starfield, Indiana Jones etc. Microsoft bought Activision and Blizzard and just saw the same thing repeat with Call of Duty.

All the cheering for Microsoft acquisitions only placed significantly more scrutiny on the executives to deliver and they didn't. Now it's in the endgame and it's do or die in terms of revenue generation. You can probably draw a direct line between their failures and major changes at Microsoft pushed on the division by the CEO and CFO.
 
Phil Spencer had the backing of the biggest company in the world with an endless war chest and still failed. He should have been out 3-4 years ago.

His tenure will go down as a failure.
 
Top Bottom