daninthemix
Member
He's rich and doesn't need to work?
It is also (unlikely) possible he is really retiring, could also be for health reasons. The guy worked there for 35 years, his net worth is in tens of millions of dollars.
Bond not leaving a farewell message might mean she was really fired without notice, which would be strange for such a high profile executive.
Doesn't he also own an F40 ?His networth is probably up in six figures, counting in Swedish currency, so he'll likely be able to retire to a very comfortable life.
From what I understand he is staying on in an advisory role to help transition Sharma. He will be officially gone sometime in the Summer. (According to Matty).I get that he is retiring. But in a normal scenario, he stays on for a few months especially in the 25th anniversary of Xbox.
No it's not. Provide the evidence he was clearly fired. Else all you are doing is speculating.It's clear that he was fired.
The difference is Nadella is the guy who puts the pressure on others to perform within Microsoft. Nadella is only pressured by the shareholders, thus shit roles downhill.I don't buy the retiring excuse. Phil is 58, guess who is also 58 and not retiring?
![]()
Yeah, it is clear to most people.No it's not. Provide the evidence he was clearly fired. Else all you are doing is speculating.
I don't buy the retiring excuse. Phil is 58, guess who is also 58 and not retiring?
![]()
Anyone who
Yeah, it is clear to most people.
Is it possible he retired and his successor in the wings chose to resign for shits and giggles on the same day AI was promoted, sure? Lots of things are possible. Doesn't mean we should ignore common sense, the long string of failures, the recent quarterly reports, the other long string of failures, or the rest of the failures.
As are you. At least my speculation doesn't require me to trust the same common sense defying spin they've been throwing out every December for 13 years.You're still just speculating.
As are you. At least my speculation doesn't require me to trust the same common sense defying spin they've been throwing out every December for 13 years.
You could have just said you have no evidence and left it at that. It's probable he was pushed out yes; but again just speculation.Anyone who
Yeah, it is clear to most people.
Is it possible he retired and his successor in the wings chose to resign for shits and giggles on the same day AI was promoted, sure? Lots of things are possible. Doesn't mean we should ignore common sense, the long string of failures, the recent quarterly reports, the other long string of failures, or the rest of the failures.
They also (usually for top execs) give them the option to eitherYeah, because Nadella is really going to tell the whole world in an email that Spencer was doing a bad job. This is how executives are shown the door in the real world. Wake up. They thank the person leaving and move on.
Phil gambled on a future where no gamer would own any games and every gamer on the planet would give him 10 bucks a month in exchange for a plethora of games.
I was wondering when somebody was going to state the obvious.Possibly the fact he's almost single handedly ruined Xbox.
I do not know Phil's situation and what deals were made but I do have an anecdotal example. Several years ago, I walked an executive out of the building that had "retired." He even stayed on for six months as a consultant after this. Since I had a good relationship with him, he was pretty forthcoming with me about what had happened and he was absolutely pissed that they announced his "retirement" in an internal communication. Over the years, I have seen several examples of early retirement for executive and upper management. It seems common for it to happen when a project is completed or if things are moving in a new direction.They also (usually for top execs) give them the option to either
1. Leave/retire of their "own accord"
Or
2. Be publicly Fired
Most will almost always choose option 1.