Westbahnhof
Banned
Please dont confuse the inaccurate horseshoe theory with the completely accurate fish hook theory.
You cannot be serious
Edit: Okay, I googled it and it's basically a communist meme, not a real theory.
Please dont confuse the inaccurate horseshoe theory with the completely accurate fish hook theory.
Yes, but most liberals (and people in general) don't think big enough. What's going to happen in a society where labor has no value and everything from a taxi to food service to an accountant is automated? No one wants to talk about that.
I've said it already here, the far-left is tolerated and seen with good eyes on Gaf. As another user pointed out, sickle and hammer are accepted here, the swastika is not, and it shouldn't, of course, but there is no difference between them. They represent murder, dictatorship, surpressing of human rights, starvation and so on.
You are conflating authoritarianism with communism. The two aren't instrinsticly linked.Visit North Korea and the Eastern Bloc then tell me communism is good. On paper it sounds wonderful but then you give total power to a person and total power corrupts and suddenly you have a dictator on your hands.
Yes, but most liberals (and people in general) don't think big enough. What's going to happen in a society where labor has no value and everything from a taxi to food service to an accountant is automated? No one wants to talk about that.
Social democracy is a step. It still relies on a capitalist economic system. Pure egalitarianism cannot be achieved in an economic system that values profits over people. Welfare capitalism is even more insidious. It's like a mosquito, it injects you with a numbing agent so you don't feel it drain the blood from you.Isn't social democracy what you want then? Nordic model?
I'm keen on it myself and I think it paves a way for the future.
Communism with robots or without is wrong.
When did I bring up West Germany in my post or said that it was or wasn't more male dominated?
Also, even if it was more male dominated than East (which it wasn't besides them being more open to have women on the work force because they wanted everyone in labour), East Germany literally abused, suppressed and manipulated its people, spied on them and fostered a culture of surveillance where people should report everyone on the government's behalf. What is even the point of your post?
Huh, not sure how I didn't knew about this term before
Social democracy is a step. It still relies on a capitalist economic system. Pure egalitarianism cannot be achieved in an economic system that values profits over people. Welfare capitalism is even more insidious. It's like a mosquito, it injects you with a numbing agent so you don't feel it drain the blood from you.
You are conflating authoritarianism with communism. The two aren't instrinsticly linked.
As I explained on the last page communism is perfectly achievable within a technologically advanced free democratic society.
LULIf it is better for society the free market will take care of it.
Considered reading the OP? The article is about the life of women in Eastern and Western Germany. Western Germany was closer to USA than to a free society in many social matters.
This doesn't change the fact that the DDR was a regime which was deadwrong (mildly put) on many things, don't worry about that.
I'd argue that the former (communism) in theory does not rely on the violent suppression on others due to their race.
Nazism does.
Another explanation being that in a state where any other form of entertainment is either heavily censored (so practically unusable) or semi-illegal, sex is the best entertainment left. Also, the often lack of electricity and usage of candle lights instead might prove very romantic.
Sure, having your job guaranteed no matter how poor you are at your job makes everybody relaxed too.
Utopia is a very far reach.
I'll stick with improving on and within capitalism and learning from history.
That doesn't sound very sustainable.
I know this study was comparing East with West Germany, I still don't get how and why I was supposedly a history revisionist with my original post.
Certainly is for the most prosperous countries in the world.
Eastern Germany: Allowed to work, maternity leave, great childcare system
Western Germany: He owned her stuff and she needed his approval for work, lol, lol
Some things were better. Doesn't outweight the shit the regime did or make it any better.
What the hell is up with all the posters in here insinuating that people in East fucking Germany had better living standards than in a modern western society and that East Germany wasn't a horrible dictatorship that completely crippled its people?
Fuck outta here with that delusional history revisionism
Can't revision history if you never knew it to begin with
There are quite a few self-declared communists on this board. It would be funny if it weren't sad.
*looks at current climate catastrophe*
*looks at how capitalism helps drive said climate catastrophe but giving the fossil fuel industry a disproportionate amount of power etc*
Yes very sustainable
Exactly, that was the point of my post.
Marx didn't get everything right. 19th century or even 20th century communist theory doesn't apply anymore. We've made vast technological advances that they could never dream of. Communism doesn't need to be stateless, there doesn't need to be a "Vanguard Party". Communism in the second half of the 21st century can exist within a free democratic framework. This is techno-communism, not anarcho-communism. The means of production will be in every home.Theoretical communism is non-authoritarian. It's a stateless, without currencies, and classless but transitioning from our current world to a stateless one needs a "Vanguard Party" as Lenin put it, a single-party rule to move into the new world. These turn into authoritarianism. They've never worked, they never will work.
Just tell me would you be fine if the GOP became the single-ruling party of America? No, you wouldn't. Because why? It. Doesn't. Work.
I grew up in Germany during the 80s, and went to see the wall at Checkpoint Charlie. Crazy to think it came down right after we left. Well, we left shortly after the border was opened, but before the actual wall came down.It was so awesome they had to build a wall to keep people away.
Some of the countries are doing their bit to counter that, excluding the US at the moment.
That's what improving on and within capitalism means.
I don't think capitalism is perfect.
Do the means of production create themselves? Do homes full of these means of production suddenly become free?The means of production will be in every home.
I read your post as people in East fucking Germany didn't have better living standards. Sorry for that. My point was while overall this being indeed the case, in some cases it simply isn't.
And these few cases did effect women in particular in their everyday life.
*looks at current climate catastrophe*
*looks at how capitalism helps drive said climate catastrophe but giving the fossil fuel industry a disproportionate amount of power etc*
Yes very sustainable
Which do you think is worse for a woman, modern day US society or Eastern Germany's?
Just to make is clear I'm not making a statement either way, just curious.
Isn't social democracy what you want then? Nordic model?
I'm keen on it myself and I think it paves a way for the future. As for full automation and AI, that is left to be seen and society will develop towards it slowly.
Communism with robots or without is wrong and it will lead to collapse as it led numerous times throughout history.
Ah yes, all those past times we had communism with robots. I still fondly remember the global collapse of 2008 caused by communist robots!
I mean, if we compare the ecological track record of communist states it's not exactly a worthy alternative. Looking at the wastelands of the Aral lake and other catastrophes.
Unless they make a conscious effort to, humans in general don't take good care of their environment. Even societies where money and modern technology doesn't exist.
Do we have any actual details on the stats behind this batshit thesis? This is worse than the cancer causes/cancer prevents stories on the 10:00 news.
"Yes, academics overwhelmingly risked their lives fleeing communism to avoid censorship and starvation - but let's suggest Soviet employment and daycare centers meant increased female orgasms. Let's base a click bait article off a handful of testimonies!!!!"
You know what actual historical evidence suggests? East Berlin was the most successful region of Soviet Expansion, but even then it was a fucking shit hole that women risked their livelihoods and lives of their children to desperately escape. Finding one woman to say she experienced "freedom" under communism doesn't make it so. Listen, capitalism isn't perfect - but everyone enjoys so SO many more fundamental rights. Anyone would rather be poor in any modern western culture than any communist country. To romanticize communisms only reveals the ignorant elitism afforded by the orgasm denying culture you so detest.
Doesn't surprise me at all, makes total sense. I'm sure everyone had better sex, not just women. Women are happier and in turn men too.
Ah yes, all those past times we had communism with robots. I still fondly remember the global collapse of 2008 caused by communist robots!
He's saying that communism will collapse with or without robots. Probably because it has proven to not be able to handle external pressure from competing nations very well. Can't expect the current economic situation to last forever. Nothing does. I expect "the next big thing" will evolve from successful capitalist countries rather than failed communist ideology. Most of the biggest proponents of Communism collapsed (Soviet Union), are introducing capitalism (China), or on the verge of something (Venezuela) while capitalism is still going strong but clearly there's some clamor for change.
You know what was a real damper on communist sex? Censorship and starving to death.
Do we have any actual details on the stats behind this batshit thesis? This is worse than the cancer causes/cancer prevents stories on the 10:00 news.
"Yes, academics overwhelmingly risked their lives fleeing communism to avoid censorship and starvation - but let's suggest Soviet employment and daycare centers meant increased female orgasms. Let's base a click bait article off a handful of testimonies!!!!"
You know what actual historical evidence suggests? East Berlin was the most successful region of Soviet Expansion, but even then it was a fucking shit hole that women risked their livelihoods and lives of their children to desperately escape. Finding one woman to say she experienced "freedom" under communism doesn't make it so. Listen, capitalism isn't perfect - but everyone enjoys so SO many more fundamental rights. Anyone would rather be poor in any modern western culture than any communist country. To romanticize communisms only reveals the ignorant elitism afforded by the orgasm denying culture you so detest.
Oh give me a fucking break.
The sex was great!
I mean, our children starved to death, we were forced to eat our parents because the politburo starved us to death, and our homosexual friends were sent to concentration camp, but think about the sex!
No stats, of course.
The whole "Red Century" series by the New York Times, which seems to be glorifying socialism/communism, is outright disgusting.
Yes, let's ignore the massive oppression of freedoms. Yes, let's ignore dictators imprisoning and sometimes even killing the political opposition. Yes, let's ignore the massive starvation in both the USSR and the PRC. (There's documented evidence of Ukrainians just starving and dying in the middle of the streets when stuff was at its worst in the 1930s.) Yes, let's ignore that Venezuela's economy was recently run to the ground. And so many other documented examples of the failures of communism that it will take me a whole day to type out.
Yes, let's ignore all of that documented history and economic data because a couple of women anecdotally had orgasms.
Get the hell out of my face, NYT, y'all are a bunch of clowns.
Eating your parents is the greatest aphrodisiac.
I've said it already here, the far-left is tolerated and seen with good eyes on Gaf. As another user pointed out, sickle and hammer are accepted here, the swastika is not, and it shouldn't, of course, but there is no difference between them. They represent murder, dictatorship, surpressing of human rights, starvation and so on.