Wii U Speculation Thread 2: Can't take anymore of this!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back to my last point: if it's just a rebranding, why wasn't it on the Mario Kart box art? The new branding was obviously ready at that time. And also, why sink money into the marketing department to rebrand something that hasn't changed?

Answer those questions, and I'm sure people would let it go.

Why is this obvious?

nnetwork.jpg
 
If anyone thinks that we're going to get current PC level capabilities with next gen consoles, you're going to be very disappointed once all three are available.
 
I think Xbox 3 releasing asap will be the best situation for the WiiU. Seems like the biggest thing that can block it's way is the PS3/360, especially at their low prices. They need Sony/MS to kill them off. It's the only way I think they'll have a chance of obtaining that userbase. Get them during the early next gen scramble.
 
I think Xbox 3 releasing asap will be the best situation for the WiiU. Seems like the biggest thing that can block it's way is the PS3/360, especially at their low prices. They need Sony/MS to kill them off. It's the only way I think they'll have a chance of obtaining that userbase. Get them during the early next gen scramble.

I agree, but in the case of MS there's no way that the 360 is getting killed off any time soon. Even though the hardware is past its prime, it's still exceptionally profitable. Even if the 720 were to launch today, expect MS to continue promoting the 360 for a few more years.

The only way Wii U is going to pull that audience away is by being noticeably more powerful, and by Nintendo agreesively using their head start to their advantage.
 
I agree, but in the case of MS there's no way that the 360 is getting killed off any time soon. Even though the hardware is past its prime, it's still exceptionally profitable. Even if the 720 were to launch today, expect MS to continue promoting the 360 for a few more years.

The only way Wii U is going to pull that audience away is by being noticeably more powerful, and by Nintendo agreesively using their head start to their advantage.
I think it depends on what MS plans on doing with the Kinect and its next generation. If they stray further into the casual audience or stay close to the core.
 
I can dig what you're saying and if we were talking about any other company than Nintendo I would entirely agree with you. I've got nothing that would validate my opinion or anything like that, but I hang on this paragraph above. I think that when it comes to Nintendo and third parties, there's another factor, less tangible, that plays a role just as important as the real honest to god factors you listed. I think it's this factor that caused many companies to say, "We'll wait and see what's going on with the market before we commit" even as the Wii was exploding on the marketplace and conversely, "We're very anxious to get our software on the PS3. Lower the price Sony!"

I guess where our difference of opinion really lies is in the presence and nature of this 'x factor'. I think that nearly all aspects of the market's behavior can be explained without resorting to this 'unknown'. For example, the attitude you describe in the last sentence is a clear result of pre-launch investment in PS software development projects. If PS3 didn't succeed, the bets they'd already placed wouldn't pay off.

You've been around so you know I'm paraphrasing the market currents of prev gen launch, but I think it illustrates my point well enough to give you an understanding of where I'm coming from. If we'd seen at least some follow-ups to early successes on the Wii, I'd be more inclined to not spiral into this weird area of discourse.

I'm certainly not going to praise the third party treatment of the Wii and its audience, because when they did decide that the Wii was worth betting on, they made some really bad decisions about how to bet on it, managing to significantly alienate the audience in the process. Not to shit on shooting gallery games, but by teaching the enthusiast audience that that's all that Wii's asymmetric control advantage is good for, they squandered a lot of its potential. Of course, Nintendo missed many opportunities in this area as well, so there's that.

May as well add to what I edited in above while the thread is slow. I think the odd thing here is how long it actually took for the PS3 to become a viable platform. Beyond that, I don't think the PS3 would have even eventually become a viable platform without a good amount of the industry really pulling for it to happen. I definitely understand the ps3/pc/360 as one platform as an argument, and I think it's a good one for the latter half of the generation. I just think it's important to understand how it eventually came to be that way cause it sure as shit didn't start that way.

Sony managed to price-correct before the attitudes of pre-launch investment evaporated entirely, providing it with enough users to fully participate in the dominant mid and late-gen development and publishing strategy. Wii's late-gen slump didn't need to be as bad as it was, and Nintendo and third parties can both be blamed for this, but it was always an inevitability that 360 and PS3 would end the generation as a superior platform for games designed primarily for a dual-analog control scheme.

One other thing to consider is that while third parties are relatively hungry for a hardware refresh, Microsoft and especially Sony are hungry for another fiscal year where their console business is in the black. Neither of them are providing the kind of evangelism that existed in '04-'05, so third party publishers are left making a much more diffuse and platform-agnostic bet on the next generation. While they have little pre-launch incentive to heavily support the U, they've got no reason to leave it out in the cold unless Nintendo gives them one.
 
I think Xbox 3 releasing asap will be the best situation for the WiiU. Seems like the biggest thing that can block it's way is the PS3/360, especially at their low prices. They need Sony/MS to kill them off. It's the only way I think they'll have a chance of obtaining that userbase. Get them during the early next gen scramble.

I disagree. Any time that the WiiU has for itself as the most technologically capable console on the market will be valuable for them, if they can use that time wisely. Any ports they can get where their version is considered the best will be a boon. Of course they'll benefit from comparison to a higher priced console, but before then, being the only game in town?

And PS360 will be around for ages at their low prices, if MS and Sony have anything to say about it.
 
[Nintex];34511348 said:
Nintendo even fired some potshots at E3 2005 at Microsoft. Saying that they weren't impressed with a system that barely had any running games(Reggie) and that they weren't impressed with the way titles like Kameo looked, Miyamoto or Aonuma... I can't quite remember was quoted saying something like: "If you look at what we're doing with Zelda on GameCube and what these so called next-gen games look like I don't see much of a difference". That sure stirred up the pot back in 2005.

On a SD TV, there really wasn't that much visual difference between a Gamecube game and a Xbox360 game. I remember seeing Gears of War back then, it looked prettier since it had more polygons, but that was it.

Now, when I saw Gears of War on a HDTV, my jaw dropped. Now THAT looked next gen.
 
This doesn't mean the logo was ready or they were ready to start putting it on boxes or using the logo internationally.

It just means they had a name.

Rule #1 of Marketing: Don't use your brand prematurely without properly establishing it. If it were JUST a re-brand, they failed miserably at Rule #1. And if you consider this to be incorrect, consider for the moment that if this marketing rule were followed, we wouldn't even be HAVING this discussion, would we?

Have you SEEN the logo? I'm pretty sure they banged that out 5 minutes after the name was decided. C'mon, try again.

And you still have yet to address that it's change for the sake of nothing, if your point were to be valid.
 
I disagree. Any time that the WiiU has for itself as the most technologically capable console on the market will be valuable for them, if they can use that time wisely. Any ports they can get where their version is considered the best will be a boon. Of course they'll benefit from comparison to a higher priced console, but before then, being the only game in town?

And PS360 will be around for ages at their low prices, if MS and Sony have anything to say about it.

Even while this is true, I still think Nintendo has a lot to gain from MS launching close them.

1) It makes it incredibly less likely that the 720 will feature hardware that severely outclasses the WiiU. In fact, in makes it very likely that, even if the 720 has better hardware (which it will), the Wii U and NextBox will at least still be in the same visual tier.

2) Launching close to Nintendo means they're launching ahead of Sony. This, coupled with the speculation that MS will be launching a more conservative console that doesn't go for bleeding edge power means that the "HD Twins" narrative is officially killed dead. This will effectively leave Sony in the black sheep position the Wii was in this gen, and work wonders for the Wii U's brand perception.
 
Yeah, Wii U was announced because they basically had to right? That was after all the rumors and leaks.
Which means they might have to talk more in depth about Wii U soon as well, as a lot of Nintendo's partners have their annual shareholder meetings soon and will want or have to talk about their Wii U plans or involvement in their 2012 outlook.
 
No. But being either ahead, on par or near to par most of the time is competitive.

When it comes to graphical power I don't find second place to be competitive... It's first place or nothing.

1st gen: Magnavox Odyssey
2nd gen: ColecoVision
3rd gen: Sega Master System
4th gen: Neo-Geo AES
5th gen: Nintendo 64
6th gen: XBox
7th gen: PS3

Still... Gamecube is my favorite console of all time.
 
No more DBZ comparisons?
Dang...

I don't even know wtf is going on in DBZ. This is a gaming forum, so everyone knows what a gamecube is at least. Besides, people keep shifting the power levels all over the place. If we say it's 400 Gamecubes Duct Taped Together, no one can argue if it's really Super Saiyan 2 or ascended super saiyan.

The acronym will be GDTT

The Wii is 2 GDTT.
 
No more DBZ comparisons?
Dang...

Of course we're still going with DBZ comparisons!

So the final dev kits are a bit more powerful than anticipated, right? They got a slight but noticeable boost somewhere. Kind of like when Vegeta went Maijin? Too bad the 720 is probably holding back and letting the Wii U get some good punches in before completely obliterating it (fat buu) and causing nintendo to go 3rd party (self destruct). The real contest will begin once Sony appears and shows us the true power of the playstation 4 (ssj3 goku).
 
When it comes to graphical power I don't find second place to be competitive... It's first place or nothing.

1st gen: Magnavox Odyssey
2nd gen: ColecoVision
3rd gen: Sega Master System
4th gen: Neo-Geo AES
5th gen: Nintendo 64
6th gen: XBox
7th gen: PS3

Still... Gamecube is my favorite console of all time.

So much failure on that list that it's astounding that you hold such a position. And even the 1 or 2 good ones on that list still sold like total and utter shit.
 
No more DBZ comparisons?
Dang...

Speaking of this, after pioneering the DBZ to console comparison metric on GAF, I'm somewhat tempted to start using different sets of Tenchi characters to represent reactions to news on the next gen trio. Only problem is, that's too anime for even me to do regularly. :lol

Also EWW GT.
 
So much failure on that list that it's astounding that you hold such a position.

So I'm wrong (when it comes to performance)?

1st gen: Magnavox Odyssey
2nd gen: ColecoVision
3rd gen: Sega Master System
4th gen: Neo-Geo AES
5th gen: Nintendo 64
6th gen: XBox
7th gen: PS3
 
When it comes to graphical power I don't find second place to be competitive... It's first place or nothing.

1st gen: Magnavox Odyssey
2nd gen: ColecoVision
3rd gen: Sega Master System
4th gen: Neo-Geo AES
5th gen: Nintendo 64
6th gen: XBox
7th gen: PS3

Still... Gamecube is my favorite console of all time.

How can only one console be competitive? Let's face it. You were wrong.
 
Even while this is true, I still think Nintendo has a lot to gain from MS launching close them.

1) It makes it incredibly less likely that the 720 will feature hardware that severely outclasses the WiiU. In fact, in makes it very likely that, even if the 720 has better hardware (which it will), the Wii U and NextBox will at least still be in the same visual tier.

2) Launching close to Nintendo means they're launching ahead of Sony. This, coupled with the speculation that MS will be launching a more conservative console that doesn't go for bleeding edge power means that the "HD Twins" narrative is officially killed dead. This will effectively leave Sony in the black sheep position the Wii was in this gen, and work wonders for the Wii U's brand perception.
Nextbox will be considerably more powerful than WiiU, whenever they launch.
 
Did we know that Monolith Soft set up a new studio in Kyoto last October?

Was just fishing around their website and that was news to me.

Also, the Tokyo Office is the one with the Wii U project running, currently (? dunno when last updated) looking to urgently recruit programmers, planners, 3DCG designers, and 2D designers.
 
Did we know that Monolith Soft set up a new studio in Kyoto last October?

Was just fishing around their website and that was news to me.

Also, the Tokyo Office is the one with the Wii U project running, currently (? dunno when last updated) looking to urgently recruit programmers, planners, 3DCG designers, and 2D designers.

Yeah, we had heard that.
They likely have a Wii U and a 3DS game going right now.
 
I normally try to avoid these debates when posted in threads dealing with the other consoles, but since you posted that here I'd like to hear your reasoning.
Because as far as we know, WiiU will be nothing but upgrade of current gen consoles. Say, 1gb of ram, 4xxx series GPU and quad core cpu. No doubt MS can pull out something with at least 2x more performance. It won't be like this gen, but there should be noticable differences.

Nothing that they showed at E3(Zelda demo?) was particularly impressive, and reading B3D it seemed like nothing had any AA.
 
Because as far as we know, WiiU will be nothing but upgrade of current gen consoles. Say, 1gb of ram, 4xxx series GPU and quad core cpu. No doubt MS can pull out something with at least 2x more performance. It won't be like this gen, but there should be noticable differences.

Nothing that they showed at E3(Zelda demo?) was particularly impressive, and reading B3D it seemed like nothing had any AA.

Sigh...
 
How can only one console be competitive? Let's face it. You were wrong.

I never said that. Lets try it again.

Mr.Saturn: Is the wiiu being 3x more powerful than the ps3 that big of a stretch?

Me: Nintendo.

GameplayWhore: The reason why saying "Nintendo" is a problematic response is that in the home console realm it has a general overwhelming history of releasing systems that are competitive from a cpu and graphics standpoint. So your answer stated the opposite of your intent.

Me: So, being behind most of the time is... 'competitive'?

GameplayWhore: No. But being either ahead, on par or near to par most of the time is competitive.

Me: When it comes to graphical power I don't find second place to be competitive... It's first place or nothing.

1st gen: Magnavox Odyssey
2nd gen: ColecoVision
3rd gen: Sega Master System
4th gen: Neo-Geo AES
5th gen: Nintendo 64
6th gen: XBox
7th gen: PS3

Still... Gamecube is my favorite console of all time.
 
Because as far as we know, WiiU will be nothing but upgrade of current gen consoles. Say, 1gb of ram, 4xxx series GPU and quad core cpu. No doubt MS can pull out something with at least 2x more performance. It won't be like this gen, but there should be noticable differences.

Nothing that they showed at E3(Zelda demo?) was particularly impressive, and reading B3D it seemed like nothing had any AA.
I was blown away by that Zelda demo...I can't be the only one.
 
Man some people are going to commit gaming suicide next gen unless something happens and everyone takes a break designing consoles until 2014.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom