Wii U Speculation thread IV: Photoshop rumors and image memes

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not worried about Japanese third-party support for Wii U. Nintendo has better relationships with them compared to western devs. Besides, with the exception of Ubisoft, pretty much the rest of the Wii U's currently announced titles are mostly ports. They're playing it safe.

Agreed. If Nintendo fucks up Japanese 3rd party support, I would be relatively surprised.
 
I'm with DragonKnight. Honestly I wouldn't mind if next-generation there was no such thing as a third party exclusive. Everything goes on everything no matter what. Leave the differentiation competition up to the manufacturers themselves, and their in-house studios and online services and all that jazz.
 
The last couple bits of information he disseminated were spontaneous and not pre-announced. Give him some credit.

Yeah, but shouldn't be doing this at all. If he wasn't to split things up to keep the thread alive, fine. I'd do the same to a degree. I just don't like him letting this fame go to his head.
 
foolish to think they'll be much more than relegated to the casual oriented games though. I fully expect it to only be used in the Wii _____ games and local multiplayer stuff like those minigame things they showed, chase mii and all that.

3rd party devs either WON'T implement at all (likely), or will make it a secondary form of control as an option. Whether the wiimote is packed or not, the wiiU IS the uPad. That's the experience they are pushing.

It all comes down to if a game benefits from pointer controls. I think Activision will probably put pointer controls into BlOps2, just because fans were incredibly happy and receptive to it in the CoD Wii title. And that will set the tone for the Wiimote continuing to be a viable control method. The main point of the Upad is that now developers don't have to feel PRESSURED into using it, they can use it in titles where there's a legitimate gain for using it.

Like, if Namco wanted to do a Time Crisis on WiiU, do you think they'll use the PAD for controls? FUCK NO. So again, it's all about where it fits best.
 
I'm with DragonKnight. Honestly I wouldn't mind if next-generation there was no such thing as a third party exclusive. Everything goes on everything no matter what. Leave the differentiation competition up to the manufacturers themselves, and their in-house studios and online services and all that jazz.

I third this. I would prefer to have one console going forward. Obviously, the Wii did not get the big third party HD twins multiplatform games. Having the Wii and 360 was fine, but I like consolidation and I don't need 2-3 consoles plugged into my entertainment center.

If I could get all the big third party games that interest me, plus all the wonderful Nintendo exclusives, plus a competent online system that allows me to easily play with my friends... Gaming nirvana for me.
 
Yeah, but shouldn't be doing this at all. If he wasn't to split things up to keep the thread alive, fine. I'd do the same to a degree. I just don't like him letting this fame go to his head.

eh, it really hasn't gone to his head. his disposition has remained unchanged since the first day he posted. he's just very eccentric and flashy which I guess frustrates most people in this thread who constantly hunger for information.
 
I'm with DragonKnight. Honestly I wouldn't mind if next-generation there was no such thing as a third party exclusive. Everything goes on everything no matter what. Leave the differentiation competition up to the manufacturers themselves, and their in-house studios and online services and all that jazz.

If Nintendo pulls ahead as the obvious market leader in Japan, you will see the same thing you saw with the PS2: de-facto exclusivity.
 
I don't expect any exclusive third party titles. And I really don't care. I just want the games.

Oh, there will be exclusives from third parties. Just look at the Wii launch line-up. The quality was so-so, but there was a lot of exclusives. And with Wii U they’re not limited by hardware, and it doesn’t have controllers that require a brand new control scheme. Traditional dual analog + touch screen is not going to be trial by error in the same way motion+IR was.
 
What information?

Hrmm… assuming that I recorded it properly:

#8928, IdeaMan notes that third party devs are not aware of a Nintendo-branded hard drive as of mid-April

And possibly also unannounced was:

#6597, IdeaMan: not powerful enough to render to TV and two DRCs at max settings


Both the above are "well, duh" nuggets. But I think that neither were reported in the "I will tell you something… soon!" style.



Yeah, but shouldn't be doing this at all. If he wasn't to split things up to keep the thread alive, fine. I'd do the same to a degree. I just don't like him letting this fame go to his head.

My general philosophy here is that none of this is really serious business. I mean he's having fun talking to people about fun.
 
Hrmm… assuming that I recorded it properly:

#8928, IdeaMan notes that third party devs are not aware of a Nintendo-branded hard drive as of mid-April

And possibly also unannounced was:

#6597, IdeaMan: not powerful enough to render to TV and two DRCs at max settings


He forgot to mention that Nintendo is working on a new peripheral for Wii U that will be included with a game that I can't name yet without getting in trouble. *eye roll*
 
Yeah, it's the main thing I'm worried about too. They really need to fix that this time out, this platform is aiming for way too broad of an audience for them to be able to go it alone.

With JP devs, we'll see. I figure it's mostly NDAs right now and we're just hearing less due to cultural differences. Won't know for sure until E3 though.

Only one I'm not too sure about is Konami, Kojima seems to have a stick screwed really far up his ass WRT Ninendo, never really understood what the deal was with that.

Konami were rumored to be making a Contra game for Wii U or 3DS but we haven't heard anything since. I get the feeling Castlevania, MGR:R and MGS5 won't be making it though. It's disappointing, but as I was trying to point out earlier. The reason Epic Mickey 2 & Tomb Raider aren't making it to Wii U is because they were too far into development to port it over. Now take into account that Resident Evil 6 probably started development around the same time and that it will likely make it to Wii U at a later date has me cautiously optimistic. Then there's the problem that Durango & Orbius will be significantly more powerful leaving Wii U in the dust and I get let down again. Thus repeats the cycle. I should just stop posting until E3.
 
I'm ready for Excite Racer. Cars, trucks, bikes, robots, boats, planes, whatever!

Funny thing is, being European and having no idea that a sequel to Excite Truck was even made at the time, I made a thread on another forum ages back musing over ideas for an "Excite Racer" game like what you've described. Add in the ability to play your own music and lots of fun ideas and I'm game. I prefer unrealistic racing games to realistic ones any day and it's nice to have some alternatives to Mario Kart.
 
It all comes down to if a game benefits from pointer controls. I think Activision will probably put pointer controls into BlOps2, just because fans were incredibly happy and receptive to it in the CoD Wii title. And that will set the tone for the Wiimote continuing to be a viable control method. The main point of the Upad is that now developers don't have to feel PRESSURED into using it, they can use it in titles where there's a legitimate gain for using it.

Like, if Namco wanted to do a Time Crisis on WiiU, do you think they'll use the PAD for controls? FUCK NO. So again, it's all about where it fits best.
I'm not saying it won't be in games though, like your COD example, I'm saying it'll be a secondary option for control only when devs choose to implement it. Only time I see it being the primary method is for some random party game or WiiU sports or something.
 
Has he ever posted something that gives him any credibility? I don't frequent this thread quite often enough to shake my skepticism... but I want to believe.
 
Konami were rumored to be making a Contra game for Wii U or 3DS but we haven't heard anything since. I get the feeling Castlevania, MGR:R and MGS5 won't be making it though. It's disappointing, but as I was trying to point out earlier. The reason Epic Mickey 2 & Tomb Raider aren't making it to Wii U is because they were too far into development to port it over. Now take into account that Resident Evil 6 probably started development around the same time and that it will likely make it to Wii U at a later date has me cautiously optimistic. Then there's the problem that Durango & Orbius will be significantly more powerful leaving Wii U in the dust and I get let down again. Thus repeats the cycle. I should just stop posting until E3.

I would be shocked if Castlevania isn't on 3DS and if it isn't announced by or at E3. There was a rumor it was going to be at the pre-TGS 3DS conference, but it didn't surface. (I kinda hope its closer to 64 than 2D metroidvania...)

My hope for RE6 has dwindled a lot over the last month. I'm sure they'll be a late port, but I was hoping it would be at or near launch on Wii U :-(
 
Has he ever posted something that gives him any credibility? I don't frequent this thread quite often enough to shake my skepticism... but I want to believe.

he's posted quite a bit of information over the past couple of threads but it's not as if he's verified or anything. what I can tell you which should aid in his defense is that he's spoken with a verified dev on here who has actually worked with the console and that poster believes his legitimacy so that should count for something
 
Oh, there will be exclusives from third parties. Just look at the Wii launch line-up. The quality was so-so, but there was a lot of exclusives. And with Wii U they’re not limited by hardware, and it doesn’t have controllers that require a brand new control scheme. Traditional dual analog + touch screen is not going to be trial by error in the same way motion+IR was.

No more bullshit third party support. Seriously
 
he's posted quite a bit of information over the past couple of threads but it's not as if he's verified or anything. what I can tell you which should aid in his defense is that he's spoken with a verified dev on here who has actually worked with the console and that poster believes his legitimacy so that should count for something

Well at least that is a tick in the right direction. And I guess he can't go into to much detail for the risk of being murdered in his sleep.
 
Konami were rumored to be making a Contra game for Wii U or 3DS but we haven't heard anything since. I get the feeling Castlevania, MGR:R and MGS5 won't be making it though. It's disappointing, but as I was trying to point out earlier. The reason Epic Mickey 2 & Tomb Raider aren't making it to Wii U is because they were too far into development to port it over. Now take into account that Resident Evil 6 probably started development around the same time and that it will likely make it to Wii U at a later date has me cautiously optimistic. Then there's the problem that Durango & Orbius will be significantly more powerful leaving Wii U in the dust and I get let down again. Thus repeats the cycle. I should just stop posting until E3.

You just summed up my fears
 
Yeah, good point, thanks. And not going to Walmart = not supporting an evil corporation and less chance of me getting robbed of my system in the parking lot. :p Best Buy lines are awful too. So do both Target and Gamestop make an exception and do midnight launches? Sorry if this sounds ignorant but one of the few times I've bought something game related at midnight was SMG 2.

I think only Gamestop might. When I went to get the Wii at Target it was a morning launch but it was pretty civil. I usually go to Gamestop for midnight game launches so I haven't experience a console launch with them myself.


You just summed up my fears

I wouldn't worry about it until after E3. I think Japanese developers tend to keep their mouths tightly sealed because of Nintendo.
 
Well at least that is a tick in the right direction. And I guess he can't go into to much detail for the risk of being murdered in his sleep.

well he's apparently an ex journalist so he's likely relying on old business relationships to get this information. I'm assuming because he's no longer that deep in the industry these sources would not be easily replaceable if their trust in him were to be broken.
 
Has he ever posted something that gives him any credibility? I don't frequent this thread quite often enough to shake my skepticism... but I want to believe.

He has certainly posted more concrete things than what I posted above, but his stuff is always just enough within the realm of reason that they sound reasonable, and he does a good job of downplaying both rampant pessimism and super-hype optimism. There is no data that he has disseminated which can be explicitly verified (but this is true of pretty much any leak we've heard from anybody so far). However, from this earlier post of mine:


lherre said:
Ideaman and me talked via pm and we "exchanged" info about wii U. I think that he has good info in some ways, but you have to understand that this info can be subjective too (for example in the perception that his "friends" can have about the machine), just like mine.

I'm not trying to legitimize him (only the mods can) but I think it can be interesting to hear what he wants to say (or his connections allow him to say).

lherre is considered confirmed by the mods, so IdeaMan is… second order confirmed, I guess. His alibi for not being directly confirmed by mods (which is actually a reasonable alibi) is that he is a former journalist, not a current employee of a developer or publisher, so there is nothing that could actually be confirmed which would guarantee that he has access to a devkit.
 
Even if Ps4/Nextbox are really powerful... it's doubtful that many developers are going to be spending all that money on those games when they can just be cheap, and make games across PS3+/WiiU/360+.


He has certainly posted more concrete things than what I posted above, but his stuff is always just enough within the realm of reason that they sound reasonable, and he does a good job of downplaying both rampant pessimism and super-hype optimism. There is no data that he has disseminated which can be explicitly verified (but this is true of pretty much any leak we've heard from anybody so far). However, this earlier post of mine:




lherre is considered confirmed by the mods, so IdeaMan is… second order confirmed, I guess. His alibi for not being directly confirmed by mods (which is actually a reasonable alibi) is that he is a former journalist, not a current employee of a developer or publisher, so there is nothing that could actually be confirmed which would guarantee that he has access to a devkit.

Well if lherre is a believer then I guess I'll, as suggested, at least listen. But e3 can't come soon enough.
 
You just summed up my fears

Well, next year will be the last big wave of PS3/360 games and then I expect most devs to switch if they haven't already. There's still a possibility of late ports like RE6. Time will tell though. It really depends on how powerful Wii U is. If it can't run UE4 at all I will be very concerned.
 
don't you guys think you're being a bit too cynical on the matter?

People can't stand being optimistic. Being a pessimist means that you can be right all along or be blown away.

Don't worry, I remain the eternal untainted optimist here. Caution and forced pessimism is for pussies.
 
Even if Ps4/Nextbox are really powerful... it's doubtful that many developers are going to be spending all that money on those games when they can just be cheap, and make games across PS3+/WiiU/360+.

Kind of like how Wii was cheaper to develop for than PS3/360?
 
Kind of like how Wii was cheaper to develop for than PS3/360?

And it is. It just got perverted into meaning that developing for the Wii was somehow more expensive because they'd have to add a Wii version on top of the money set aside for PS3/360 games. Which meant developing for the Wii was expensive. Or something.

I know it doesn't sound like it makes sense but if you think real hard about it and then imagine yourself getting hit in the head with a brick, it'll make sense.
 
don't you guys think you're being a bit too cynical on the matter?

DooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooomed! ;)


Even if Ps4/Nextbox are really powerful... it's doubtful that many developers are going to be spending all that money on those games when they can just be cheap, and make games across PS3+/WiiU/360+.

Kind of like how Wii was cheaper to develop for than PS3/360?

For what it's worth, the Wii's development cheapness was offset by being so different that it was much cheaper to develop for the other two systems that it would have been to do so for all three. This time around, the system is hardly different (according to the latest known facts and rumours) in the places that count the most -- available inputs and gpu effect capabilities. These barriers are now gone, so it could mean much more third party support.




Well if lherre is a believer then I guess I'll, as suggested, at least listen. But e3 can't come soon enough.

Keep in mind that lherre (and actually IdeaMan himself!) coached us to keep in mind that IdeaMan's information was somewhat peppered by subjectivity. The keyword is often "context".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom