But its there, the desktop is there and you will have to use it some times.
Windows isnt killing backwards compatibility, its there, its a feature to me.
So why are so many 'windows' apps, so untouch friendly still? To me its just half assing, they can change windows explorer to be more touch friendly, but there are loads of things that still are not.
And its small things, making check boxes bigger, making icons bigger, making... well things bigger >.>!
For an instance, disk cleanup, its still got these tinyyy tick boxes in it, why not fix it? Why not make it bigger for tablets? A skin? Something?
Thats just a smalllll example, but the fact is, tablets wont have a 'no desktop' experience, for a full windows experience. It will be awhile after launch before most apps are even tablet friendly, ignoring that there wont be metro ones for awhile too.
These things arent also down toa choice between 'touch' and 'not touch' they can easily be made to be friendly for both.
And honestly, after the first day, I didnt really care about the start menu thing, to me its a non issue really. I dont think its a good idea personally, because they didnt 'get rid of it' they just made it a whole screen thats kinda useless on desktops... Instead of scrolling and small folders, we have replaced it with swiping and large icons... to me its just bad design that kind of sums up alot of the things I have problems with. (That they are trying to make a desktop and tablet os, and are harming the experience of both in the attempt)