Joe Molotov
Member
I'm surprised that isn't on there.
Nope, just the new dub, which is an improvement in almost every conceivable way except for in my heart
I'm surprised that isn't on there.
I mean, it's a show about teenagers and love. Not for nothing, but after watching hundreds of teen love animes over the last 7 or 8 years, the best I expect from this show is some character arcs that deviate from the norm. I'm not expecting Skins from this show.I think you have a perverted idea of what "substance" is.
I spell it d-ie-construction, so it's okay.AnimeGAF discord is working on legislation to regulate usage of "substance" much like how we plan to restrict the usage of "deconstruction" without a demonstrable background in the works of Jacques Derrida or "feels" without having read W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley's essay The Affective Fallacy.
AnimeGAF discord is working on legislation to regulate usage of "substance" much like how we plan to restrict the usage of "deconstruction" without a demonstrable background in the works of Jacques Derrida or "feels" without having read W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley's essay The Affective Fallacy.
Nope, just the new dub, which is an improvement in almost every conceivable way except for in my heart
I honestly don't know if molecular gastronomy is in vogue anymore (it's probably as cliche as putting steak in a bag and boiling it for an hour), but I can understand the intent in trying to play with expectations of food by either presenting it in its constituent pieces or assembling the ingredients in an unexpected manner.I've recently read s.th. about deconstructed food. IIRC you sort of take apart the ingredients of a dish and then put them together in a different way.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/d-chen/neogaf-dota2-emoticons/master/gifs/cm-vi3.gif
(it's probably as cliche as putting steak in a bag and boiling it for an hour)
Speaking of which:AnimeGAF discord is working on legislation to regulate usage of "substance" much like how we plan to restrict the usage of "deconstruction" without a demonstrable background in the works of Jacques Derrida or "feels" without having read W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley's essay The Affective Fallacy.
lol>an hour
Sous vide is getting more traction these days because of new affordable kitchen appliances that let you sous vide without the previously associated cost.
Food "deconstruction" involves lot of slabs and mason jars.
But it's a big thing in Singapore now!Haly pls.
Speaking of which:
http://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2017/02/05-1/watch-crunchyroll-explain-deconstruction
note: haven't watched it.
Despite it's flaws, Vampire Hunter D is still one of my all-time favorites. I just wish Sentai had included the original Streamline dub on the Blu-Ray.
lolduckroll is a mod-sin
I mean, it's a show about teenagers and love. Not for nothing, but after watching hundreds of teen love animes over the last 7 or 8 years, the best I expect from this show is some character arcs that deviate from the norm. I'm not expecting Skins from this show.
That happens when you watch too much crap and you're always looking for the constituent parts of any work because that's just what you're trained to do. lolIt's your sociological reduction of everything into an assemblage of tropes and categories, with no regard for the individual, that bothers me. But as I said, as Scum's Wish specifically goes I remain skeptical that it really has anything to say.
Well, anyone can get an MA in Literature so.Do we need a new rule saying you need a MA in Film/Literature/Linguistics to mention Derrida?
Oh yeah, I meant to specify that I watched Bloodlust not the first one. Should I watch the first one? It's up on YouTube too.
Okay you need a BSc in CS and Math on top of a MA in Literature.
That happens when you watch too much crap and you're always looking for the constituent parts of any work because that's just what you're trained to do. lol
It's your sociological reduction of everything into an assemblage of tropes and categories, with no regard for the individual, that bothers me. But as I said, as Scum's Wish specifically goes I remain skeptical that it really has anything to say.
But isn't that how all things are made? I find it really hard to believe that the majority of entertainment, especially entertainment targeted as predictable niches, to be born of some natural desire to express something rather than the quest for more money. That doesn't mean it can't be good, or that the people who end up working on it can't have something to say, but it's not overly cynical to see most entertainment as an assembly of tropes to target demographics first and foremost. It's just being realistic.
Okay you need a BSc in CS and Math on top of a MA in Literature.
Do we need a new rule saying you need a MA in Film/Literature/Linguistics to mention Derrida?
Well, anyone can get an MA in Literature so.
But isn't that how all things are made? I find it really hard to believe that the majority of entertainment, especially entertainment targeted as predictable niches, to be born of some natural desire to express something rather than the quest for more money. That doesn't mean it can't be good, or that the people who end up working on it can't have something to say, but it's not overly cynical to see most entertainment as an assembly of tropes to target demographics first and foremost. It's just being realistic.
I'm not sold on this being as big of a factor in manga, although I guess you could place it on which stuff publishers choose to take, there...
But isn't that how all things are made? I find it really hard to believe that the majority of entertainment, especially entertainment targeted as predictable niches, to be born of some natural desire to express something rather than the quest for more money. That doesn't mean it can't be good, or that the people who end up working on it can't have something to say, but it's not overly cynical to see most entertainment as an assembly of tropes to target demographics first and foremost. It's just being realistic.
But isn't that how all things are made? I find it really hard to believe that the majority of entertainment, especially entertainment targeted as predictable niches, to be born of some natural desire to express something rather than the quest for more money. That doesn't mean it can't be good, or that the people who end up working on it can't have something to say, but it's not overly cynical to see most entertainment as an assembly of tropes to target demographics first and foremost. It's just being realistic.
I'm objecting to a worldview where people don't matter except as they check off certain desirable demographic boxes, whether in real life or fiction. This is a reductive way of approaching the world that I find distasteful. Of course I don't mean to deny the existence of crass commercialism in art and entertainment - and the more blatant that crass commercialism is, the more I tend to dislike something - but to view everything as nothing but crass commercialism is a cynical view that makes us worse as human beings.
Well, it also helps to be more sensitive to the shortcomings of other members here. Not everyone is as well informed or aware of specific creators and people involved in making anime. People tend to talk about what they know. If firehawk doesn't staffwhore enough to be able to talk about those things, he can only fall back on the crutch of listing tropes based on his academia experience. We shouldn't shame him for that!
I have a law degree am i doomed to only discuss Phoenix Wright and wizard barristers until the end of time
I have a law degree am i doomed to only discuss Phoenix Wright and wizard barristers until the end of time
.
Wizard Barristers S2 when?
I have a law degree am i doomed to only discuss Phoenix Wright and wizard barristers until the end of time
There's law type stuff in Ghost in the Shell and Patlabor
This is kinda Off topic, but i'm watching yu-gi-oh, the end of the "waking the dragons arc" and it's just... hot trash. Seriously what the fuck is this.