I didn't see anything about this posted elsewhere. It's interesting to see the Walker administration and their impact on the various state departments.
http://www.wpr.org/why-was-climate-change-language-stripped-dnr-web-page
Example:
Before
After
I haven't dealt with lot of meddling under the three Secretary's I have served under in my department, especially given the political nature of the SNAP program. There has been a definite push towards drug testing and I have had to give answers to the executive and legislative branch that they probably didn't like, but when a programs benefits are 100% federally funded, there isn't a lot the state can do to meddle when extensive public law and federal regulations define nearly every aspect of a program.
http://www.wpr.org/why-was-climate-change-language-stripped-dnr-web-page
References to climate change, rising temperatures and the human activities that cause them have been removed recently from a Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources web page.
The revisions were caught by James Rowen, a former reporter and editor at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel who now blogs about state politics. He said this isn't the first time Gov. Scott Walker and his administration deliberately carried out politicized changes to state-sponsored websites, and that it's a reflection of the "chamber of commerce mentality" coming from the state Capitol.
"I noticed that even though it's a website about the impact of climate change on Wisconsin and the Great Lakes, most of the references to climate change, as well as the specific words 'climate' and 'climate change,' were no longer on the page," Rowen said.
As recently as October, the heading of the web page read "Climate Change and Wisconsin's Great Lakes" in big, bold letters, and then went on to explain human activities are increasing greenhouse gases and contributing to the warming of the planet.
Example:
Before
After
I haven't dealt with lot of meddling under the three Secretary's I have served under in my department, especially given the political nature of the SNAP program. There has been a definite push towards drug testing and I have had to give answers to the executive and legislative branch that they probably didn't like, but when a programs benefits are 100% federally funded, there isn't a lot the state can do to meddle when extensive public law and federal regulations define nearly every aspect of a program.