It's just a game, man. Go ahead and finish the deed.
That's the thing, I was describing the deed I couldn't finish as a comparison to current hype level

Upon reflection, I should have sought a better analogy to begin with so I'll try to balance now:
You are right, it is a game but it is an extremely appealing game to me, it's lore just sits well with me. More than with others, I admit. I was also more tolerant of the issues both games (obviously) had. Need I say more than "Yrden, trap it with Yrden!"
Been gaming since mid 80's, after early lessons, I became somewhat hype immune, on average I get hyped 5 times per decade. This is one of those times. Witcher 3 is bound to be the equivalent of Game of Thrones.
There is no way in hell I could be bothered with switching ISP's now yet I would still bet my account it's at least a 9/10 game. Honestly, it wouldn't even be that much of a loss, GAF often digests even most specific info without my input already.
Among those lucky enough to try it, there are few seasoned RPG connoisseurs appearing to really like the game. One of the most impressive characteristics that became obvious from watching the videos is letting the player off the leash. From the hours of footage I already watched, the game has an abundance of content. Skinny games, especially those that are skinny even with DLC's, tend to funnel players via scripted events which in turn causes players to experience everything that's in the game in one playthrough. Not much meat left after the DLC griffins pick their share so all of it has to be presented. Unlike so with W3.
One can go through the game without taking a boat ride. Not meeting harpies during the ride. Not finding out that the boat has implemented physics. Or that when the harpies start flapping their wings while clawing the boat, there is an immediate impact on how the boat behaves. The game has so much content, detailed content at that...