That complaint would make way more sense applied to Cyberpunk, when they shifted from third-person historical fantasy with fixed protagonist to first-person futuristic sci-fi with customisable character.
It's very simple, many people don't give a fuck about ciri and don't want to have her as a protagonist because they don't like her.
Rayla isn't a witcher. Where did you get that?
I think they will do what this people always do ... write her character basically as a man and throw her skin over it ... there will be plot lines dealing with misogyny and whatnot, some lesbian romances and so on ... writing her really as a good woman character without overlapping with mans characteristics would be the fucking surprise... but it wont happen.
Me reading the article is exactly what made me realize it was a mischaracterization
. Would these pills help me misinterpret written text?
Me reading the article is exactly what made me realize it was a mischaracterization
I played the game, If you join the Order of the Flaming Rose, she gets almost killed by Scoia'tael but Azar gets her and turns her into one of his mutated Witcher freaks and then you have to fight her.
Nothing ironic about it. I think you are in dire need of perspective on this topic.
Geralt barely passed and thus would not let her attempt.
Yeah, I recall that part, but those people aren't witchers, they're enhanced puppets they manipulate and her mind is fucked up.
She's not a Witcher. She's experimented on and turned into some kind of zombie. Timecoded video:
They are a western dev. Just in jankland."we're not suddenly making up stuff just because we want to"
He's talking about you western devs.
Whole point of them was, that they were "the perfect" Witchers in the Jacques fucked up view, because regular Witchers still had feelings, which was unnecessary according to him. They were also create by stolen Wicher mutagens, which I thought was the gist of your argument? That Woman cannot survive them.
I have finished TW1 three times. They were, so far as I know, created by experimentation and mutation but there is nothing about it being through the trial of the grasses. You should exit the thread now.
So, themselves?"we're not suddenly making up stuff just because we want to"
He's talking about you western devs.
It's not the Trial of Grasses. At the start of the game where they break into Kaer Moren, they steal mutagens from the keep. Later on, they experiment even on animals with the objective of creating mutant supersoldiers. Those guys are NOT witchers and they didn't go through the Trial of Grasses. They're merely people who got enhanced using mutagens as a base, but no one knows how the entire process goes, or what kind of modifications they did. Furthermore, Rayla's mind was effectively gone, so if your argument is that a woman got messed up mutations that turned her into a slave, thus Ciri should survive the Trials of Grasses, I will have to disagree.
Other western devs.
Reading comp a problem? It's the author that can make it up. It's his story. If he says Ciri is a Witcher, she is a Witcher. Plenty of reasons why this could work.
Yeah, no shit. So why do you insult people when they take issue with something that is blatantly not consistent with the game world?
You joke but I think we might have another Rey on our hands. And Rey's problem was poor writing that hurts the story and the lore of Star Wars and suspension of disbelief from the audience. Not Rey herself. I mean...
-No need to do the Trial of the Grasses, many reasons not to
Like CDPR is?
